Perceptions of health professions students on the use of immersive virtual reality
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Over the past decade, the utilisation of technology in education has undergone a rapid shift, which the COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated. Students are the end users when introducing a new tool such as virtual reality (VR).
Objective. This study aimed to explore health professions students’ perceptions of the use and application of VR in education.
Methods. A total of 18 participants were recruited for this semi-structured study. The study used qualitative research design, employing Braun and Clarke’s six-step approach to thematic analysis. The research was conducted across various departments and schools within a South African university health science faculty.
Results. Although, for most participants, this was their initial encounter with VR, the experience was predominantly beneficial and enjoyable. The engaging and interactive nature of VR captivated the participants, facilitating a secure environment for learning. Furthermore, they were convinced that VR holds significant potential in anatomical and clinical education domains.
Conclusion. The study results present a positive reception of VR as a valuable educational tool by offering immersive, engaging and interactive learning experiences. Despite technical and financial hurdles, the potential of VR to enhance visual comprehension, provide safe and practical training scenarios, and align with curriculum goals, particularly during inaccessible clinical settings such as the COVID-19 pandemic, showcases its promising future in education.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The AJHPE is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
Kolla S, Elgawly M, Gaughan JP, Goldman E. Medical student perception of a virtual reality training module for anatomy education. Med Sci Educ 2020;30:1201-1210.
Huang KT, Ball C, Francis J, Ratan R, Boumis J, Fordham J. Augmented versus virtual reality in education: An exploratory study examining science knowledge retention when using augmented reality/virtual reality mobile applications. Cyberpsychology Behav Soc Netw 2019;22(2):105-110.
Merchant Z, Goetz ET, Cifuentes L, Keeney-Kennicutt W, Davis TJ. Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Comput Educ 2014;70:29-40.
Huang HM, Rauch U, Liaw SS. Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Comput Educ 2010;55(3):1171-1182.
Santos Garduño HA, Esparza Martínez MI, Portuguez Castro M. Impact of virtual reality on student motivation in a high school science course. Appl Sci 2021;11(20):9516.
Van Dijk JA. Digital divide: Impact of access. Int Encycl Media Eff 2017;1-11.
Radianti J, Majchrzak TA, Fromm J, Wohlgenannt I. A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications
for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Comput Educ 2020;147:103778.
Aissaoui N. The digital divide: A literature review and some directions for future research in light of COVID-19.
Glob Knowl Mem Commun 2022;71(8/9):686-708.
Rashid AT. Digital inclusion and social inequality: Gender differences in ICT access and use in five developing
countries. Gend Technol Dev 2016;20(3):306-332.
Lei C, Sunzi K, Dai F, et al. Effects of virtual reality rehabilitation training on gait and balance in patients with
Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review. PloS One 2019;14(11):e0224819.
Reymus M, Liebermann A, Diegritz C. Virtual reality: An effective tool for teaching root canal anatomy to
undergraduate dental students–a preliminary study. Int Endod J 2020;53(11):1581-1587.
Sattar MU, Palaniappan S, Lokman A, Hassan A, Shah N, Riaz Z. Effects of virtual reality training on medical
students’ learning motivation and competency. Pak J Med Sci 2019;35(3):852.
Szymkowiak A, Melović B, Dabić M, Jeganathan K, Kundi GS. Information technology and Gen Z: The role of
teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technol Soc 2021;65:101565.
Mosca JB, Curtis KP, Savoth PG. New approaches to learning for Generation Z. J Bus Divers 2019;19(3).
Freina L, Ott M. A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State of the art and perspectives.
In: International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education. p. 10-1007. Proceedings of the
Conference: eLearning and Software for Education (eLSE); 2015; Bucharest.
Ziatdinov R, Cilliers J. Generation Alpha: Understanding the next cohort of university students. European
Journal of Contemporary Education 2021;10(3):783-789.
Giordano NA, Whitney CE, Axson SA, Cassidy K, Rosado E, Hoyt-Brennan AM. A pilot study to compare
virtual reality to hybrid simulation for opioid-related overdose and naloxone training. Nurse Educ Today
;88:104365.
Al-Rahmi WM, Alias N, Othman MS, et al. Use of e-learning by university students in Malaysian higher
educational institutions: A case in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Ieee Access 2018;6:14268-14276.
Bearman M. Focus on methodology: Eliciting rich data: A practical approach to writing semi-structured
interview schedules. Focus Health Prof Educ Multi-Prof J 2019;20(3):1-11.
Clarke V, Braun V, Hayfield N. Thematic analysis. In: Smith JA, editor. Qualitative psychology: A Practical Guide
to Research Methods. London: SAGE Publications, 2015; p. 222-248.
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and
variability. Field Methods 2006;18(1):59-82.
Kyaw BM, Saxena N, Posadzki P, et al. Virtual reality for health professions education: Systematic review and
meta-analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J Med Internet Res 2019;21(1):e12959.
Pottle J. Virtual reality and the transformation of medical education. Future Health J 2019;6(3):181.
Cooper G, Park H, Nasr Z, Thong LP, Johnson R. Using virtual reality in the classroom: Preservice teachers’
perceptions of its use as a teaching and learning tool. Educ Media Int 2019;56(1):1-13.
Makransky G, Lilleholt L, Aaby A. Development and validation of the Multimodal Presence Scale for virtual reality environments: A confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory approach. Comput Hum Behav
;72:276-285.
Retnanto A, Fadlelmula M, Alyafei N, Sheharyar A. Active student engagement in learning-using virtual reality
technology to develop professional skills for petroleum engineering education. In: SPE Annual Technical
Conference and Exhibition, September 2019. OnePetro 2019.
Liu D, Bhagat KK, Gao Y, Chang TW, Huang R. The potentials and trends of virtual reality in education. In: Liu D,
Dede C, Huang R, Richards J, editors. Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2017. 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5490-7_7