Students' perceptions of human dignity in occupational therapy education
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Human dignity is a fundamental constitutional right essential to occupational therapy (OT) education and practice, aligning with the graduate attributes of Ubuntu, human rights and ethics. However, little is known about its integration into OT education at universities.
Objective. To explore how OT students perceive human dignity in OT education.
Methods. A qualitative exploratory descriptive study was conducted with 30 purposively selected OT students from first to fourth year. The study involved four focus group discussions (FGDs), which were audiotaped, transcribed and thematically analysed through an iterative and credible process.
Results. Participants seemed to grapple with understanding human dignity but knew it was part of human rights and OT. Two major themes were identified: students’ perceptions of human dignity and the notion of human dignity as a central concept left on the side.
Conclusion. The findings are relevant for curriculum transformation and integration of human dignity into OT education. They can be used to equip undergraduate OT students with the knowledge and skills needed to enhance their understanding of human dignity, human rights and advocacy for clients in cases of rights violations. Participants noted that while human dignity was an omitted concept in the classroom, clinical supervisors provided significant learning opportunities for them to learn about human rights. Students’ willingness to expand their knowledge of human dignity enabled them to apply and integrate existing policies and legislative frameworks such as the Bill of Rights and the Batho Pele principles into their learning.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The AJHPE is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
1. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Act No. 108 of 1996.
2. Sæteren B, Nåden D. Dignity: An essential foundation for promoting health and well-being. In: Haugan G,
Eriksson M, editors. Health Promotion in Health Care - Vital Theories and Research 2021:71-84. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978-3-030-63135-2_7
3. Winter CJ. Decolonising dignity for inclusive democracy. Environ Values 2019;28(1):9-30. https://doi.org/10.31
97/096327119X15445433913550
4. Horn R, Kerasidou A. The concept of dignity and its use in end-of-life debates in England and France. CQ: Int J Healthcare Ethics Committees 2016;25(3):404-413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180116000050
5. Van der Merwe T. Occupational therapy and the quest for human dignity: Why human rights matter. S Afr J Occup Ther 2010;40(1):17-21.
6. Peičius E, Urbonas G, Harrison WD, et al. Dignity violations and barriers to dignity assurance for terminally ill patients at the end of life: A cross-sectional analysis. Medicina 2022;58(2):294. https://doi.org/10.3390/ medicina58020294
7. Ekpenyong S, Nyashanu M, Ossey-Nweze C, Serrant, L. Exploring the perceptions of dignity among patients and nurses in hospital and community settings: An integrative review. J Res Nurs 2021;26(6):517-537. https://doi. org/10.1177/1744987121997890
8. Chochinov HM. Dignity and the essence of medicine: The A, B, C, and D of dignity conserving care. Br Med J 2007;335(7612):184-187. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39244.650926.47