Exploring COIL as an authentic learning pedagogy
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Collaborative online international learning (COIL) has become popular within universities to internationalise the curriculum and enable students’ development as global citizens. It facilitates the coconstruction of disciplinary knowledge across cultures. This authentic learning experience is characterised by an authentic context, authentic tasks, access to experts and the incorporation of multiple roles and perspectives. By emphasising collaborative knowledge construction, reflection, articulation, coaching and scaffolding, COIL can potentially enhance engagement and improve educational outcomes, especially when designed to reflect the complex tasks performed by professionals in the field.
Objective. To explore the learning experiences of undergraduate clinical technology students participating in a COIL project and to determine whether COIL could provide an authentic learning environment.
Methods. A qualitative approach, sampling 2nd-year clinical technology students (n=16) registered for a Research Methodology I module at a university of technology, was employed. After ethics approval was obtained, we conducted focus group discussions, lasting approximately 45 - 60 minutes, using a semi-structured interview guide. Data were examined using thematic analysis.
Results. Five themes emerged: Participant experiences, communication, cultural perceptions, the development of graduate attributes and translating theory to practice. Despite the challenges, such as time zones, delays in peer responses and poor connectivity, students reported a positive experience. Language was a challenge, but they overcame this by adopting innovative digital tools. Students were exposed to the lifestyles of their Mexican peers, and work-balance strategies were shared. Being exposed to peers from a different lingua-culture, having the same demands and a common purpose was a catalyst for the exchange of cultural knowledge. This also created a platform for intercultural sensitivities. Students were able to work as a team, were motivated by their peers and adapted to the challenges. The theme translation of theory into practice enabled students to conceptualise theoretical content in a practical manner, which ultimately enhanced their learning.
Conclusion. COIL is a useful pedagogy to offer an authentic learning experience for research methods; it satisfies all nine constructs of authentic learning.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The AJHPE is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
1. Kiegaldie D, Pepe A, Shaw L, Evans T. Implementation of a collaborative online international learning program in nursing education: Protocol for a mixed methods study. BMC Nursing 2022;21(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12912-022-01031-9
2. Liu Y, Shirley T. Without crossing a border: Exploring the impact of shifting study abroad online on students’ learning and intercultural competence development during the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Learn J 2021;25(1):182. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2471
3. Potter T, Bragadóttir H. Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL): A New Model of Global Education. Routledge international handbook of nurse education. New York: Routledge. 2019.
4. Herrington J. Authentic learning environments in higher education: IGI Global; 2005.
5. Ndawo G. The development of self skills in an authentic learning environment: A qualitative study
2022;45(1):2198. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2198
6. Herrington J, Oliver R. An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educ Techn
Res Dev 2000;48(3):23-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856
7. Pinto M, Leite C. Digital technologies in support of students learning in higher education: Literature review.
Digital Educ Rev 2020(37):343-360.
8. Herrington J, Reeves TC, Oliver R. A Practical Guide to Authentic e-Learning. Taylor & Francis; 2009.
9. Erez M, Lisak A, Harush R, Glikson E, Nouri R, Shokef E. Going global: Developing management students’
cultural intelligence and global identity in culturally diverse virtual teams. Acad Manage Learn Educ
2013;12(3):330-355. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0200
10. Rubin J. Embedding collaborative online international learning (COIL) at higher education institutions. Int
Higher Educ 2017;2:27-44.
11. Pouromid S, Wiasih E. Exploring mobility of knowledge as an approach to internationalisation in higher
education during and beyond uncertain times. InThe 4th PIM International Conference 2021 Mar 3.
12. Borger JG. Getting to the CoRe of Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL). Front Educ
2022;7:987289. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.987289
13. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol 2006;3(2):77-101. https://
doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
14. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE. 1985.
15. Bosque-Pérez NA, Klos PZ, Force JE, et al. A pedagogical model for team-based, problem-focused
interdisciplinary doctoral education. Bio Sci 2016;66(6):477-488. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw042
16. Naicker A, Singh E, van Genugten T. Collaborative online international learning (COIL): Preparedness and experiences of South African students. Innov Educ Teach Int 2022;59(5):499-510. https://doi.org/10.1080/1
4703297.2021.1895867
17. Appiah-Kubi P, Annan E. A review of a collaborative online international learning. Int J Engineering Pedagogy 2020;10(1). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v10i1.11678
18. Ambrose M, Murray L, Handoyo NE, Tunggal D, Cooling N. Learning global health: A pilot study of an online collaborative intercultural peer group activity involving medical students in Australia and Indonesia. BMC med educ 2017;17(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0851-6
19. Dai ML, Fan DX, Wang R, Ou YH, Ma XL. Does rural tourism revitalise the countryside? An exploration of the spatial reconstruction through the lens of cultural connotations of rurality. J Destination Market Manage 2023;29:100801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2023.100801
20. Guth S. The COIL Institute for Globally Networked Learning in the Humanities. Final report New York, NY: SUNY COIL Center. 2013.
21. Shin Y, Kim D, Song D. Types and timing of scaffolding to promote meaningful peer interaction and increase learning performance in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. J Educ Comput Res 2020;58(3):640-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119877134
22. Slof B, Erkens G, Kirschner PA, Jaspers J. Design and effects of representational scripting on group performance. Educ Techn Res Develop 2010;58:589-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9148-3
23. Huang R, Shimizu Y. Improving teaching, developing teachers and teacher educators, and linking theory and practice through lesson study in mathematics: An international perspective. ZDM Math Educ 2016;48(4):393- 409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0795-7
24. Kalaian SA, Kasim RM. A meta-analytic review of studies of the effectiveness of small-group learning methods on statistics achievement. J Statistics Educ 2014;22(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2014.11 889691
25. Wood EA, Collins SL, Mueller S, Stetten NE, El-Shokry M. Transforming perspectives through virtual exchange: A US-Egypt Partnership Part 1. Front Public Health 2022;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpubh.2022.877547
26. Neumeyer X, McKenna A. Entrepreneurial thinking in interdisciplinary student teams. Adv Engineering Educ 2016;5(1):n1.