The use of postmortem exposure to improve the learning of anatomy and physiology in nursing students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Anatomy and physiology are crucial subjects in medical and nursing education curricula. However, many students find these subjects challenging owing to their complexity. To bridge the gap between theory and practice, a study was conducted to explore the use of postmortem exposure (PME) as a visual teaching strategy to enhance students’ understanding of anatomy and physiology.
Objective. To explore how PME influences the learning of anatomy and physiology among enrolled nursing students.
Methods. The study adopted a qualitative methodology within an interpretivist paradigm. Data were generated through individual telephonic semi- structured interviews with the study participants. An inductive thematic analysis process was followed to identify themes in the data.
Results. The findings suggest that enrolled nursing students have difficulty comprehending anatomy and physiology when practical sessions are lacking. PME was identified as a valuable teaching tool that enhances students’ knowledge acquisition and retention of these subjects. The findings suggest that PME influences various aspects of students’ learning, including their knowledge, skills, behaviour and emotions in clinical practice.
Conclusion. The study concludes that PME helps enrolled nursing students to apply theoretical knowledge in clinical settings and has a positive impact on their learning of anatomy and physiology. Educators are encouraged to consider using PME as a teaching tool to improve their students’ understanding of anatomy and physiology.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The AJHPE is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
1. Cannon EJ, Bauer RN. Baccalaureate nursing students’ perceptions regarding autopsy experiences. J Forensic Nurs 2017;13(4):203-209. https://doi.org/10.1097/jfn.0000000000000172
2. Bamber A, Quince T. The value of postmortem experience in undergraduate medical education: Current perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract 2015;6:159. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s46669
3. Du Toit-Prinsloo L, Pickworth G, Saayman G. The forensic autopsy as a teaching tool: Attitudes and perceptions of undergraduate medical students at the University of Pretoria, South Africa. Afr J Health Professions Educ 2016;8(1):77. https://doi.org/10.7196/ajhpe.2016.v8i1.589
4. Satoh M, Fujimura A, Miyagawa S. Difficulties and innovations in teaching anatomy and physiology in nursing. Nurse Educ Pract 2023;67:103551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103551
5. Johnston ANB, Hamill J, Barton MJ, et al. Student learning styles in anatomy and physiology courses: Meeting the needs of nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract 2015;15(6):415-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.05.001
6. Hansen EC. Writing Qualitative Research. In: Hansen EC, ed. Successful Qualitative Health Research.
Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2020:161-178. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117599-8
7. Brink, H, van der Walt C, van Rensburg G. Fundamentals of Research Methodology for Healthcre Professionals.
3rd ed. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.
8. Mackenzie N, Knipe S. Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues Educ Res
2006;16(2):193-205.
9. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3(2):77-101. https://doi.
org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
10. McNamee LS, O’Brien FY, Botha JH. Student perceptions of medico-legal autopsy demonstrations in a student- centred curriculum. Med Educ 2009;43(1):66-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03248.x
11. Ahmad M, Rahman MF, Rahman FN, Rahman MA. Knowledge and attitude of 3rd year medical students regarding post mortem examination. J Armed Forces Med College Bangladesh 2016;12(2):9-14. https://doi. org/10.3329/jafmc.v12i2.41078
12. Anders S, Mueller M, Sperhake JP, Petersen-Ewert C, Schiekirka S, Raupach T. Autopsy in undergraduate medical education ‒ what do students really learn? Int J Legal Med 2014;128(6):1031-1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00414-014-0974-4
13. Sauter DA, Eisner F, Ekman P, Scott SK. Emotional vocalisations are recognised across cultures regardless of the valence of distractors. Psychol Sci 2015;26(3):354-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614560771
14. Keiser MM, Murray-Wright M. Autopsy observation as experiential learning for nurse practitioner students in an online advanced pathophysiology course. Nurse Educator 2019;45(2):111-113. https://doi.org/10.1097/ nne.0000000000000684
15. Romo-Barrientos C, Criado-Álvarez JJ, Martínez-Lorca A, et al. Anxiety among nursing students during their first human prosection. Nurse Educ Today 2020;85:104269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104269
16. Mezirow J. Transformative learning as discourse. J Transform Educ 2003;1(1):58-63. https://doi. org/10.1177/1541344603252172
17. Tsimane TA, Downing C. Transformative learning in nursing education: A concept analysis. Int J Nursing Sci 2020;7(1):91-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.12.006
18. Taylor DCM, Hamdy H. Adult learning theories: Implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83. Med Teach 2013;35(11):e1561-e1572. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2013.828153
19. Mezirow J. Transformative learning theory. Contemp Theories Learn 2018:114-128. https://doi.
org/10.4324/9781315147277-8
20. Ausubel DP. Schemata, cognitive structure, and advance organisers: A reply to Anderson, Spiro, and Anderson. Am Educ Res J 1980;17(3):400. https://doi.org/10.2307/1162624
21. Weurlander M, Scheja M, Hult H, Wernerson A. Emotionally challenging learning situations: Medical students’ experiences of autopsies. Int J Med Educ 2012;3:63-70. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4f75.fb6510.5116/