Interactive learning objects as a solution to challenges in basic medical science teaching

Main Article Content

L Keiller
A Alblas
J R Foiret
A V Keiller


Background. As a core component of any health professions curriculum, basic medical science modules facilitate learning of biology, anatomy, histology and physiology content. To redress the challenges of class size and poor tertiary education readiness, interactive learning objects could facilitate learning and enhance engagement between lecturers and students.
Objective. To determine whether the use of learning objects in a basic medical science first-year module is an effective tool for enhancing the student learning experience.

Methods. A case study research design with mixed methods of data collection was used. Participants provided informed consent for this study. Learning objects were incorporated into a basic medical sciences first-year module in the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa. A correlation analysis between usage statistics and assessment results was used to determine the academic effectiveness of this intervention. A thematic network analysis identified the barriers and enablers of the intervention.

Results. Student attempts at learning objects correlated with a higher assessment outcome for two of the three tutorials. Technical difficulties, timing and assessment format were barriers to learning with the use of learning objects. Enablers to learning included student enjoyment, facilitating understanding of core concepts, adaptation to new ways of learning and formative assessment. The module team received valuable feedback on the constructed learning environment through the qualitative data collected from students within this study.

Conclusion. Interactive learning objects are useful and effective tools for facilitating learning in the context of large, diverse first-year health professions education classes.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Interactive learning objects as a solution to challenges in basic medical science teaching. (2022). African Journal of Health Professions Education, 14(3), 129-134.
Research Articles

How to Cite

Interactive learning objects as a solution to challenges in basic medical science teaching. (2022). African Journal of Health Professions Education, 14(3), 129-134.


KhogaliSE,DaviesD,DonnanP,etal.Integrationofe-learningresourcesintoamedicalschoolcurriculum.Med Teach 2011;33(4):311-318.

Harden RM, Gessner IH, Gunn M, Issenberg SB, Pringle SD, Stewart A. Creating an e-learning module from learning objects using a commentary or ‘personal learning assistant’. Med Teach 2011;33(4):286-290. https://doi. org.10.3109/0142159X.2011.557104

Prober CG, Khan S. Medical education reimagined: A call to action. Acad Med 2013;88(10):1407-1410.

(accessed 20 July 2018).

Garrison DR, Vaughan ND. Institutional change and leadership associated with blended learning innovation:

Two case studies. Internet Higher Educ 2012;18:24-28.

Lewis CE, Chen DC, Relan A. Implementation of a flipped classroom approach to promote active learning in the third-year surgery clerkship. Am J Surg 2018;215(2):298-303.

Singh BH, Reed C. A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. Centra Software, 2001.

Laurillard D. Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. London:

Routledge Farmer, 2012.

Badat S, Sayed Y. Post-1994 South African education. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 2014;652(1):127-148. https://

Laurillard D. Rethinking University Education: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. 2nd edition. London: Routledge Farmer, 2002.

Laurillard D. The teacher as action researcher: Using technology to capture pedagogic form. Stud Higher Educ 2008;33(2):139-154.

Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Pawson R. Internet-based medical education: A realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Med Educ 2010;10:12. articles/10.1186/1472-6920-10-12 (accessed 27 July 2022).

Ngan OMY, Tang TLH, Chan AKY, Chen DM, Tang MK. Blended learning in anatomy teaching for non-medical students: An innovative approach to the health professions education. Health Profess Educ 2018;4(2):149-158.

Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Issenberg SB. Learning objects in medical education. Med Teach 2006;28(7):599-605.

Noor K. Case study: A strategic research methodology. Am J Applied Sci 2008;5(11):1602-1604. https://doi.


Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualit Res 2001;1(3):385-405.

Keiller L, Inglis-Jassiem G. A lesson in listening: Is the student voice heard in the rush to incorporate technology into health professions education? Afr J Health Profess Educ 2015;7(1):47-50.

Sandars J. It appeared to be a good idea at the time but ... a few steps closer to understanding how technology can enhance teaching and learning in medical education. Med Teach 2011;33(May):265-267. 3109/0142159X.2011.550972

Krauss F, Ally M. A study of the design and evaluation of a learning object and implications for content development. Interdisciplin J Knowledge Learn Objects 2005;1:1-22.

Weller M. Learning objects and the e-learning cost dilemma. Open Learn J Open Distance e-Learn 2004;19(3):293-302.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)