Reporting quality of Master of Medicine (MMed) mini-dissertations using the STROBE checklist

Main Article Content

E Grossman

Abstract





Background. The 2011 Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) directive to make a research component compulsory for specialist registration has been decried in some circles as encouraging low-quality research.
Objective. To assess the reporting quality of South African (SA) MMed mini-dissertations using the STROBE checklist.
Methods. A total of 100 monograph-format mini-dissertations reporting retrospective observational research were extracted from a pool of 335 mini- dissertations. Analysis of each was undertaken using a 24-point STROBE Statement checklist. Scoring was as follows: 1 = the item was compliant with STROBE recommendations; 0.5 = partially described; and 0 = not addressed at all. Satisfactory compliance was set at 66%, thus a STROBE score of 17-24 was considered satisfactory. Data were entered into an Excel spread sheet and analysed descriptively.


Results. STROBE item compliance for individual mini-dissertations was at a mean of 83.1%; range 50-97%; median 85% and mode 89%. Sixteen mini- dissertations were non-compliant, scoring below 17 as per the set threshold of 66%. This indicates an 84% satisfactory sample. Only Item 5 (Key settings and locations) was at 100% compliance. The four lowest scores were for STROBE items (9) Bias (29.5%); (10) Study size/power analysis (52%); (1) Title (69%) and (14) Missing data (69%).


Conclusion. The majority of sampled mini-dissertations, evaluated as per STROBE recommendations, are transparently reported to allow the reader to follow what was planned, done, found and which conclusions were drawn. As such the results confer a measure of reporting quality on the SA MMed research endeavour. The use of dissertation templates, commonly using STROBE-type headings and prompts, might have contributed to the good scores obtained. Importantly, areas of weakness in the writing of the SA MMed mini-dissertations have been highlighted and show which items require attention.





Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Reporting quality of Master of Medicine (MMed) mini-dissertations using the STROBE checklist. (2022). African Journal of Health Professions Education, 14(4), 165-170. https://doi.org/10.7196/AJHPE.2022.v14i4.1594
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Reporting quality of Master of Medicine (MMed) mini-dissertations using the STROBE checklist. (2022). African Journal of Health Professions Education, 14(4), 165-170. https://doi.org/10.7196/AJHPE.2022.v14i4.1594

References

Mouton J, Basson I, Blanckenberg J, et al. The state of the South African research enterprise. DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Scientometrics and Science, Technology and Innovation Policy. Stellenbosch University. 2019. http://www0.sun.ac.za/crest/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/state-of-the-South-African-research-enterprise.pdf

Grossman ES, Naidoo S. Academic-service partnerships, research and the dental academic. J Dent Educ 2012;76(9):1226-1233. http://repository.uwc.ac.za/xmlui/handle/10566/1205

Grossman ES, Cleaton-Jones PE. Pipelines or pipe dreams? PhD production in a South African dental research institute 1954-2006. PiE 2011;29(3):111-125. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/pie/article/view/76980

Grossman ES. Publication rate of 309 Master of Medicine dissertations submitted between 1996-2017: Can our registrars fulfil HPCSA Form 57 MED amendments? S Afr Med J 2020;110(4):302-307. https://doi.org/10.7196/ SAMJ.2020.v110i4.14339

Szabo CP, Ramlall S. Research competency and specialist registration: Quo vadis? S Afr Med J 2016;106(12):1183- 1185. https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.2016.v106i12.11217

Aldous CM, Adhikari M, Rout CC. The research component of specialist registration – a question of alligators and swamps? A personal view. S Afr Med J 2015;105(1):21-22. https://doi.org.10.7196/SAMJ.8732

Heyns T, Bresser P, Buys T, et al. Twelve tips for supervisors to move towards person centered research supervision in health care sciences, Med Teach 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1533241

Kisansa ME, Lubinga MH. Strategic and focused solutions to challenges faced by medical postgraduate students in performing research at a South African university. S Afr J High Educ 2020;34(2):59-73. https://doi. org/10.20853/34-2-3666

Biccard BM, Dyer RA, Swanevelder JL, et al. Is the HPCSA requirement for a research mini-dissertation for specialist registration the best option? South African J Anaesth Analg 2017;23(4):4-6.

Rodseth RN, Wise R, Bishop D. Polluting the well. South African J Anaesth Analg 2017;23(6):5.

Chassagnon G, Dangouloff-Ros V, Vilgrain V, et al. Academic productivity of French radiology residents: Where

do we stand? Diagn Interv Imaging 2016;97(2):211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2015.08.001

Nour-Eldien H, Mansour NM, Abdulmajeed AA. Master’s and doctoral theses in family medicine and their publication output, Suez Canal University, Egypt. J Family Med Prim Care 2015;4(2):162-167. https://doi.

org/10.4103/2249-4863.154622

Arriola-Quiroz I, Curioso WH, Cruz-Encarnacion M, et al. Characteristics and publication patterns of theses from a Peruvian medical school. Health Info Libr J 2010;27(2):148-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471- 1842.2010.00878.x

Koca K, Ekinci S, Akpancar S, et al. An analysis of orthopaedic theses in Turkey: Evidence levels and publication rates. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2016;50(5):562-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2016.03.001

Young SN. Bias in the research literature and conflict of interest: An issue for publishers, editors, reviewers and authors, and it is not just about the money. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2009;34(6):412-417.

Fathelrahman AI. Rejection of Good Manuscripts: Possible Reasons, Consequences and Solutions. J Clinic Res Bioeth 2015;6(1):204. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9627.1000204

International Science Council. Advisory Note on Bias in Science Publishing. https://council.science/publications/ advisory-note-on-bias-in-science-publishing/ (accessed 17 October 2022).

EQUATOR Network. UK Equator Centre, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford. http://equator- network.org (accessed 17 October 2022).

STROBE Statement. http://www.strobe-statement.org/ (accessed 17 October 2022).

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 2007;4(10):1623-

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296

Bhawalkar JS, Jadhav SL, Banerjee A, et al. Research trends in post-graduate medical students, Pune. Ann Med

Health Sci Res 2014;4(3):355-360. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.133459.

Dai Shuangyang, Xiaobin Zhou, Hong Xu, et al. Evaluation of the reporting quality of observational studies in

master of public health dissertations in China. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020;20:230. https://doi.org/10.1186/

s12874-020-01116-6

Shirahatti RV, Hegde-Shetiya S. Review of research designs and statistical methods employed in dental postgraduate dissertations. Indian J Dent Res 2015;26(4):427-434.

Grossman ES. How long does it take a registrar to complete the compulsory research project enabling specialist registration? S Afr Med J 2019;109(4):254-258. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i4.13377

Grossman ES. Content analysis of the South African MMed mini-dissertation. Afr J Health Prof Educ 2020b: 12(2);56-61. https://doi.org/10.7196/AJHPE.2020.v12i2.1227

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. STROBE Statement Checklist. https://www.strobe-statement.org/ fileadmin/Strobe/uploads/checklists/STROBE_checklist_v4_combined.pdf (accessed 17 October 2022).

Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Med 2007;4(10):1628-1654. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297

Singh S. An intervention to assist students with writing their dissertations and theses. S Afr J High Educ 2011;25(5):1020-1030. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/sajhe/article/view/80701

Steyn R. Ethical dilemmas associated with hyper-structured student research projects. S Afr J High Educ 2020;34(1):231-248. https://doi.org/10.20853/34-1-3095

Boehe DM. Supervisory styles: a contingency framework. Stud High Educ 2016;41(3):399-414. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/03075079.2014.927853

Ahmed Y, Kanyengo CW, Akakandelwa A. Mapping postgraduate research at the University of Zambia: a review of dissertations for the Master of Medicine programme. Med J Zambia 2010;37(2):52-57. https://www.ajol.info/ index.php/mjz/article/view/75655

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>