A journey through interprofessional education: Students’ perspectives of teamwork in a transforming curriculum
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Student engagement in curricular transformation is topical at the University of Cape Town (UCT), including in its Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS). Teamwork, which is essential to contemporary interprofessional healthcare, is an objective of transformative health sciences education. This study offers a contemporary contribution from the perspective of students to earlier work on shared learning at UCT FHS.
Objectives. There is a paucity of research literature on this study’s target population. Therefore, a qualitative design was used to explore first-year health sciences students’ perceptions and experiences of teamwork within an undergraduate shared learning programme.
Methods. The primary data collection method was focus group discussion. Two additional qualitative methods, free-listing and pile-sorting, were used to expand upon data collected in the focus groups. Results were analysed thematically.
Results. The study sample (N=32) included first-year audiology, medical, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and speech and language pathology students. The findings revealed that although their experiences of teamwork varied, students had a comprehensive perception of what teamwork entailed in their educational context. Therefore, the findings were used to generate a heuristic for teamwork learning for undergraduate health sciences students.
Conclusion. The study positions students to contribute tangibly to the curricular transformation process at their university. Students’ perspectives of teamwork may be useful in the future design and delivery of entry-level interprofessional courses aiming to instil teamwork skills.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The AJHPE is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
Paradis E, Reeves S. Key trends in interprofessional research: A macrosociological analysis from 1970 to 2010. J Interprof Care 2013;27(2):113-122. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2012.719943
Reeves S, Xyrichis A, Zwarenstein M. Teamwork, collaboration, coordination, and networking: Why we need to distinguish between different types of interprofessional practice. J Interprof Care 2018;32(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1400150
Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 2010;376(9756):1923-1958. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61854-5
Earnest MA, Williams J, Aagaard EM. Toward an optimal pedagogy for teamwork. Acad Med 2017;92(10):1378-1381. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001670
World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva: WHO, 2010.
Hammick M, Olckers L, Campion-Smith C. Learning in interprofessional teams: AMEE Guide No. 38. Med Teach 2010;31(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802585561
Reeves S. The need to problematise interprofessional education and practice activities. J Interprof Care 2010;24(4):333-335. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2010.492748
Engel J, Prentice D, Taplay K. A power experience: A phenomenological study of interprofessional education. J Prof Nurs 2016;33(3):204-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.08.012
University of Cape Town. Curriculum Change Framework. Cape Town: UCT, 2018.
Olckers L, Gibbs T, Mayers P, Alperstein M, Duncan M. Early involvement in a multiprofessional course: An integrated approach to the development of personal and interpersonal skills. Educ Prim Care 2006;17(3):249-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2006.11864069
Mayers P, Alperstein M, Duncan M, Olckers L, Gibbs T. Not just another multiprofessional course! Part 2: Nuts and bolts of designing a transformed curriculum for multi-professional learning. Med Teach 2006;28(2):152-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590600603137
Xyrichis A. Interprofessional Science: An International Field of Study Reaching Maturity. London: Taylor & Francis, 2020.
Barr H. Interprofessional Education: Today, Yesterday and Tomorrow: A Review. London: Higher Education Academy, Health Sciences and Practice Network, 2005.
Samuel MA. The Research Wheel. 3rd edition. Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal School of Education, 2017.
Stalmeijer RE, McNaughton N, van Mook WN. Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91. Med Teach 2014;36(11):923-939. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2014.917165
Henning E, van Rensburg W, Smit B. Finding your Way in Qualitative Research. Pretoria: Van Schaik, 2004.
Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exercise Health 2019;11(4):589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Michalec B, Giordano C, Dallas S, Arenson C. A longitudinal mixed-methods study of IPE students’ perceptions of health profession groups: Revisiting the contact hypothesis. J Interprof Educ Pract 2017;6:71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2016.12.008
Carpenter J, Dickinson C. Understanding interprofessional education as an intergroup encounter: The use of contact theory in programme planning. J Interprof Care 2016;30(1):103-108. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2015.1070134
Allport G. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1954.
Pettigrew TF. Intergroup contact theory. Ann Rev Psychol 1998;49(1):65-85.
Salas E, Shuffler ML, Thayer AL, Bedwell WL, Lazzara EH. Understanding and improving teamwork in organisations: A scientifically based practical guide. Hum Resource Manag 2015;54(4):599-622. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21628
Dovidio JF, Love A, Schellhaas FM, Hewstone M. Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Proc Intergroup Relations 2017;20(5):606-620. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1368430217712052