Navigating the troubled waters of higher education – a phenomenological study on the needs and challenges of first‐year clinical associate students in South Africa
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Clinical associates (ClinAs) are educated in decentralised learning platforms where they gain skills and a concrete understanding of the fundamental challenges of healthcare in remote and poverty-stricken districts of South Africa. Due to the decentralised nature of the programme, these students seldom have access to ‘on-campus’ academic and psychosocial support. A peer mentorship programme has proved useful in this regard in other settings.
Objective. To explore the unique academic and psychosocial challenges and needs of first-year clinical associate (ClinA) students and describe the views of the research participants on the perceived enablers and constraints of a ClinA peer mentorship programme.
Methods. A phenomenological research design was used. The population included ClinA students and academic members of staff. Five appreciative inquiry interviews and two focus group discussions were conducted.
Results. Four themes were identified: (i) flailing like a fish out of water (challenges experienced by ClinA students); (ii) floating devices (benefits of peer support programmes); (iii) the life saver (perceived enablers of peer support programmes); and (iv) rip currents (perceived constraints of peer support programmes).
Conclusion. Unique challenges identified were: (i) the teaching and learning strategy implemented by the facilitator of the programme; (ii) the decentralised learning platforms; and (iii) the absence of institutional support at clinical learning centres. All participants agreed that peer mentor support is beneficial and essential for ClinA students, but that the peer mentor programme needs to be bespoke to address the limited access to academic and psychosocial on-campus support and the profile of the students, who are of rural origin and first-generation students.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The AJHPE is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
Tshabalala Z, Smalley S, Louw M, et al. Clinical associates in South Africa: Optimising their contribution
to the health system. South African Health Review. 2019. https://www.hst.org.za/publications/South%20
African%20Health%20Reviews/17%20SAHR_2019_Clinical%20associates%20in%20South%20Africa.pdf
(accessed 31 March 2022).
Mlambo M, Dreyer AR, Dube R, Mapukata NO, Couper I, Cooke R. Transformation of medical education
through decentralised training platforms: A scoping review. Rural Remote Health 2018;18:4337. https://doi.
org/10.22605/RRH4337
University of Pretoria. Clinical Medical Practice (Internet). Pretoria: University of Pretoria. https://www.up.ac.za/
clinical-medical-practise (accessed 31 March 2022).
University of the Witwatersrand. Clinical Medical Practice (Internet). Johannesburg: University of the
Witwatersrand. https://www.wits.ac.za/course-finder/undergraduate/health/clinical-medical-practice/
(accessed 31 March 2022).
National Student Financial Aid Scheme. https://www.nsfas.org.za/content/mission.html (accessed 3 April 2022).
Hugo J, Slabbert J, Marcus T, et al. The clinical associate curriculum – the learning theory underpinning the
BCMP programme at the University of Pretoria. Afr J Health Professions Educ 2012;4(2):128-131. https://doi.
org/10.7196/AJHPE.188
Doherty J, Conco D, Couper I, et al. Developing a new mid-level health worker: Lessons from South Africa’s
experience with clinical associates. Glob Health Action 2013;6. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.19282
Shapiro S, Shapiro D, Schwartz G. A review of the literature on stress management in medical education, 1969 to
Acad Med 2000;75(7):748-759. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200007000-00023
Mills C, Heyworth J, Rosenwax L, et al. Factors associated with the academic success of first year health science
students. Adv Health Sci Educ 2009;14(2):205-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9103-9
Motsabi S, Diale B, van Zyl A. The role of social support in the persistence of first-year first-generation African
students in a higher education institution in South Africa. S Afr J High Educ 2020;34(4):189-210. https://doi.
org/10.20853/34-4-3486
Akinla O, Haga P, Atiomo W. A systematic review of the literature describing the outcomes of near-peer mentoring
programs for first year medical students. BMC Med Educ 2018;18(1):98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1195-1
Collings R, Swanson V, Watkins R. The impact of peer mentoring on levels of student wellbeing, integration
and retention: A controlled comparative evaluation of residential students in UK higher education. High Educ
;68(8):927-942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9752y
Kagee A, Naidoo T, Mahatey N. Theoretical underpinnings of a student mentoring programme at a historically
black university in South Africa. Int J Adv Counsel 1996;19(3):249-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00115680
McLean M. Does the curriculum matter in peer mentoring? From mentee to mentor in problembased
learning: A unique case study. Mentor Tutor Partnership Learn 2004;12(2):173-186. https://doi.
org/10.1080/136112604200023992
Masehela L, Ndebele C, Sikhwari T, et al. Mentors’ reflections of a pilot mentoring programme in a South African
university. Anthropologist 2014;17(2):367-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2014.11891446
Mammen M. Using mentees’ feedback to improve a mentoring program in a South African medical school.
Anthropologist 2012;14(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2012.11891213
Yüksel P, Yıldırım S. Theoretical frameworks, methods, and procedures for conducting phenomenological studies
in educational settings. Turkish Online J Qual Inquiry 2015;6(1).
Vygotsky LS. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.
Ackerman EK. Constructing knowledge and transforming the world. In: Tokoro M, Steels L, eds. A Learning
Zone of One’s Own: Sharing Representations and Flow in Collaborative Learning Environments. Amsterdam:
IOS Press, 2004:15-37.
Cresswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2009.
Etikan I, Musa S, Alkassim R. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theoret
Applied Stat 2016;5(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Cooperrider DL, Srivasta S. Research in Organisational Change and Development. Connecticut: JAI Press, 1987.
Tesch R. Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software. London: Routledge, 2013.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3(2):77-101.
Bojuwoye O. Stressful experiences of first year students of selected universities in South Africa. Counsel Psychol
Quarterly 2002;15(3):277-290. https://doi:10.1080/09515070210143480
Pillay A. University-based mentoring programmes for high-risk first year students: A critical literature review.
MA thesis. Gqeberha: Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, 2011.
Gershenfeld S. A review of undergraduate mentoring programs. Rev Educ Res 2014;84(3):365-391. https://doi.
org/10.3102/0034654313520512
Holt LJ, Lopez MJ. Characteristics and correlates of supportive peer mentoring: A mixed methods study. Mentor
Tutori: Partnership Learn 2014;22(5):415-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2014.983326
Sheri K, Too J, Chuah S, et al. A scoping review of mentor training programs in medicine between 1990 and 2017.
Med Educ Online 2019;24(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1555435