AJTCCM VOL. 29 NO. 2 2023 71
GUIDELINES
Background. Bronchiectasis is a chronic lung disorder that aects the lives of many South Africans. Post-tuberculosis (TB) bronchiectasis is an
important complication of previous pulmonary TB and a common cause of bronchiectasis in South Africa (SA). No previous statements on the
management of bronchiectasis in SA have been published.
Objectives. To provide a position statement that will act as a template for the management of adult patients with bronchiectasis in SA.
Methods. e South African oracic Society appointed an editorial committee to compile a position statement on the management of adult
non-cystic brosis (CF) bronchiectasis in SA.
Results. A position statement addressing the management of non-CF bronchiectasis in adults in SA was compiled. is position statement covers
the epidemiology, aetiology, diagnosis, investigations and various aspects of management of adult patients with non-CF bronchiectasis in SA.
Conclusion. Bronchiectasis has largely been a neglected lung condition, but new research has improved the outlook for patients. Collaboration
between interprofessional team members in patient management is important. In SA, more research into the epidemiology of bronchiectasis,
especially post-TB bronchiectasis and HIV-associated bronchiectasis, is required.
Keywords. Bronchiectasis, non-cystic brosis, management.
Afr J Thoracic Crit Care Med 2023;29(2):e647. https://doi.org/10.7196/AJTCCM.2023.v29i2.647
Bronchiectasis is a heterogeneous disease with multiple causes
affecting the airways that results in irreversible dilatation of the
bronchi, and is clinically characterised by a chronic cough, sputum
production and frequent exacerbations.[1,2] Coles ‘vicious cycle
hypothesis’ (Fig.1) of an inciting infection resulting in damage
to the airways and impaired mucociliary clearance, leading to
persistent airway inflammation, mucus accumulation, recurrent
respiratory tract infection and further airway damage, is a well-
recognised model for explaining the underlying pathogenesis of
bronchiectasis.[3]
South African oracic Society position statement on the
management of non-cystic brosis bronchiectasis in adults: 2023
A Goolam Mahomed,1 MB BCh, FCP (SA), FCCP ; S D Maasdorp,2 MB ChB, MMed (Int Med), FCP (SA), Cert Pulmonology (SA) Phys;
R Barnes,3 BSc (Physio), MSc (Physio), PhD; H van Aswegen,4 PhD; A Lupton-Smith,5 BSc (Physio), PhD;
B Allwood,6 MB BCh, FCP (SA,) Cert Pulmonology (SA) Phys, MPH, PhD;
G Calligaro,7 BSc Hons, MB BCh, FCP (SA), MMed (Int Med), Cert Pulmonology (SA) Phys;
C Feldman,8 MB BCh, DSc, PhD, D Med (honoris causa), FRCP, FCP (SA);
I S Kalla,8 MB BCh, PhD, FCP (SA), FCCP, Cert Pulmonology (SA) Phys, Cert Critical Care (SA)
1 Louis Pasteur Private Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
2 Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein,
South Africa
3 Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
4 Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
5 Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
6 Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
7 Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
8 Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Corresponding author: A Goolam Mahomed (akhtergm@telkomsa.net)
e South African oracic Society mandated a multidisciplinary team of healthcare providers to compile a position statement on the
management of non-cystic brosis bronchiectasis in South Africa (SA). International guidelines on the management of bronchiectasis
were reviewed and used as a basis from which the current position statement was compiled. is is the rst position statement on the
management of adult non-cystic brosis bronchiectasis in SA. A description of the epidemiology and aetiology of bronchiectasis is
provided, as well as guidance on its diagnosis and management.
e position statement provides guidance on the management of bronchiectasis to healthcare providers, policymakers and regulatory
authorities.
72 AJTCCM VOL. 29 NO. 2 2023
GUIDELINES
More recently, Flume etal.[4] described the complex pathogenesis of
bronchiectasis as a ‘vortex’ whereby impaired airway mucociliary
clearance and secretion accumulation impair normal host immunity,
resulting in recurrent and/or persistent infection, which elicits a host
inammatory response that causes airway injury and remodelling,
ultimately leading to bronchiectasis.
Bronchiectasis aects the lives of many South Africans, but it is
a neglected condition, and very little local research is available for
review. No previous statements on the management of bronchiectasis
in South Africa (SA) have been published. Given that 2019 was the
200th anniversary of the rst description of bronchiectasis by Laënnec
in 1819, the Council of the South African oracic Society (SATS)
resolved to develop a consensus statement on the management
of adult non-cystic brosis (CF) bronchiectasis in SA to celebrate
this occasion. An editorial committee under the leadership of Prof.
Akhter Goolam Mahomed and Dr Shaun Maasdorp was appointed
to perform this task.
Our objective was to provide a position statement that will act as
a template for the management of adult patients with bronchiectasis
in SA. e position statement is aimed at all healthcare practitioners
including primary care practitioners (GPs), physician specialists,
pulmonologists, nurses, physiotherapists, surgeons, pharmacists, and
ancillary specialists such as microbiologists and radiologists. We hope
that it will serve as a stimulus to conduct local research in the eld
of bronchiectasis, as we have many unanswered questions, and we
would also like it to serve as a template for guidance to policymakers
and regulatory authorities. A separate consensus document on
the management of CF has been published by the South African
Cystic Fibrosis Association.[5] The management of CF-associated
bronchiectasis is discussed in detail in that document, and therefore
will not be covered in the current document.
Members of the editorial committee comprised a balance of
specialist representatives with an interest in bronchiectasis from the
various academic sectors and private practice in SA. Each expert
member of the editorial committee was tasked with writing a section
of the document, with particular reference to the content and
evidence grading of the latest version of the British oracic Society[6]
and European Respiratory Society[7] guidelines on the management
of bronchiectasis, as well as the SA consensus guideline on the
management of CF.[5] e members communicated with each other
via e-mail and telephonically. e nal dra document was compiled
by the editorial committee and circulated among SATS Council
members for further comment. ese comments were considered by
the editorial committee, and the nal dra was then completed aer a
nal face-to-face meeting of the committee at the 2022 SATS Congress
in Cape Town.
Position statement
1. Epidemiology
ere is marked regional variation in the prevalence of bronchiectasis.
In the USA, the prevalence of bronchiectasis was estimated to be 139 per
100000 among adult patients.[8] Bronchiectasis becomes more common
with increasing age. Among US Medicare patients aged ≥65years, the
estimated prevalence was 701 per 100 000.[9] Patients enrolled in the
US Bronchiectasis Research Registry were mostly female (79%), and
the mean age at diagnosis was 57 years.[10] A UK population-based
cohort study found the prevalence of bronchiectasis to be 566 per
100 000 in women and 485 per 100 000 in men.[11] Bronchiectasis was
similarly more common in women, and the median age at diagnosis
was 61.8years.[11] e age-adjusted mortality rate for women with
bronchiectasis was 1 437.7 per 100000, a rate that was 2.26 times
higher than that of the general population.[11] Similarly, among men,
the age-adjusted mortality for patients with bronchiectasis was 1914.6
per 100000, which was 2.14 times higher compared with the general
population.[11] InGermany, the prevalence of bronchiectasis was 67 per
100000, with a higher prevalence of 192 per 100000 in patients aged
>65 years.[12] Patients with bronchiectasis in India tend to be younger
(medianage 56 years) than European and US patients and are more
likely to be male (56.9%).[13] e highest prevalence of bronchiectasis
was reported from China, with 1.2% (1 200 per 100000) of individuals
aged >40 years being diagnosed with bronchiectasis.[14] However,
bronchiectasis is by no means a condition that only aects older people.
Recommendations
In South Africa, the most common aetiology of bronchiectasis
is post-infectious, with tuberculosis being the most important
pathogen.
A work-up for secondary causes of bronchiectasis should
be performed in all patients diagnosed with diffuse
bronchiectasis.
e investigation of choice for the diagnosis of bronchiectasis
should be a thin-slice computed tomography scan of the chest
(if a chest radiograph is non-diagnostic).
Sputum Gram stain and culture should be a routine procedure
in all cases of bronchiectasis and should be done initially,
during follow-up visits, and before initiation of antibiotics in
cases with exacerbations. is allows for targeted therapeutic
interventions.
Airway clearance techniques remain the mainstay of therapy.
Bronchiectasis can coexist with other respiratory and
systemic illnesses. ese need to be identied and treated
independently.
All patients should receive an annual inuenza vaccination
and the pneumococcal vaccination, and should be vaccinated
against COVID-19. e dosing schedule should be determined
by the most current guidelines published.
Damage to airways/
mucociliary dysfunction
Mucus
accumulation
Airway infection
Airway
inammation
Fig.1. Pathogenesis of bronchiectasis.
AJTCCM VOL. 29 NO. 2 2023 73
GUIDELINES
Both idiopathic and post-tuberculosis (TB) bronchiectasis are found in
children and young adults.[15] Bronchiectasis is prevalent among patients
with HIV.[16,17] Although population-based studies are lacking in Africa,
it ishighlylikely that bronchiectasis is common and frequently under-
diagnosed given the high burden of infectious pulmonary diseases,
especially pulmonary TB and HIV, on this continent.
2. Aetiology
e list of conditions associated with bronchiectasis is extensive, as
indicated in Table1.[3,18]ere is marked geographical variation in the
aetiology of bronchiectasis.[15] In India, TB (35.5%) followed by other
infections (22.4%) are the main causes of bronchiectasis.[13] ese
gures contrast strikingly with an Australian bronchiectasis cohort,
where post-infective bronchiectasis (28.1%) was common, but post-
TB bronchiectasis was only found in 1.8%.[19] In a European cohort,
the most common causes of bronchiectasis included infections,
connective tissue disease, immunodeciency and asthma.[20] However,
idiopathic bronchiectasis still made up 40% of the study population,
and this is common to all registries, especially if an exhaustive
evaluation is not performed.[20]
2.1 Post-TB bronchiectasis
It is interesting to appreciate that, for the rst 150 of the 200 years
since it was rst described, bronchiectasis was strongly associated
with TB, yet until recently most modern publications from low-
TB settings fail to fully acknowledge TB as a major global cause
of non-CF bronchiectasis. It has recently been estimated that
155million TB survivors are currently alive,[21] with many of them
having some form of residual impairment.[22]e proportion of non-
CF cases attributable to TB naturally varies substantially according
to the population background incidence of TB, for example being
estimated at 12% in Taiwan[23] and 36% in the recent European
Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration
(EMBARC) study in India.[13] Viewed the other way, the nding of
bronchiectasis aer TB also appears to vary widely, ranging from 4 -
11% on chest radiographs to 35 - 86% on the more sensitive computed
tomography (CT) scan imaging.[24] Recently, chest radiographic imaging
in a prospective Malawian cohort found bronchiectasis in ≥1 lobe in
44.2% of adult patients aer treatment completion.[25]
TB may result in damage to a number of dierent compartments of
the lung, namely the parenchyma, large and small airways, vessels and
pleura.[26] Post-TB bronchiectasis therefore forms one of a cluster of
possible manifestations involved in the umbrella term ‘post-TB lung
disease’ and may coexist with, among others, small-airways disease (or
TB-associated obstructive lung disease) and lung brosis in any one
individual patient.[26]
Post-TB bronchiectasis appears to have a male preponderance,
probably reecting the well- known male preponderance of TB,[13]
aects the upper lobes more commonly than other causes of non-CF
bronchiectasis, and is more likely to be unilateral.[23] However, the
anity for the middle and lower zones is oen under-appreciated,
being involved in ~60% of post-TB bronchiectasis cases.[13] Additionally,
post-TB bronchiectasis appears to be more frequently associated with
a ‘frequent exacerbator’ phenotype compared with other causes,[13] and
although most commonly associated with airow obstruction, is also
more frequently associated with low forced vital capacity compared with
other causes.[13]
Isolation of other organisms in post-TB bronchiectasis patients
is not uncommon, but appears to vary substantially by geographical
location, with common organisms including Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), Haemophilus inuenzae and
Klebsiella pneumoniae.[13,23,27]
Interestingly, there is emerging evidence suggesting that the
Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI) and FACED score (forced expiratory
volume in 1 second (FEV1), age, colonisation with P. aeruginosa, number
of pulmonary lobes aected, and dyspnoea) are unable to adequately
predict exacerbations and readmissions in post-TB bronchiectasis, but
do demonstrate an association with mortality.[28]
3. Diagnosis
The main symptom of bronchiectasis in adults is a chronic cough
productive of mucopurulent sputum,[18] although bronchiectasis can also
occur in the absence of sputum production. Associated symptoms such
as dyspnoea, weight loss, fatigue and haemoptysis may develop as the
disease progresses.[18] Any history of persistent mucopurulent sputum
production therefore raises the possibility of underlying bronchiectasis.
[6] However, in patients who are not immunocompromised, reactivation
adult TB occurs in the upper lobes, which in the upright position allows
for spontaneous drainage of mucus. ese patients therefore oen do
not present with a productive cough, and this has been referred to as
dry bronchiectasis. A comprehensive clinical history and meticulous
clinical examination can reveal additional symptoms and signs
associated with an underlying cause of bronchiectasis, for example a
history of steatorrhoea with CF or the nding of situs inversus with
Kartageners syndrome.[29] e diagnosis of bronchiectasis can oen be
suspected on chest radiographic imaging, but thin-slice CT has superior
sensitivity and specicity and is therefore the imaging modality of choice
for conrmation of disease. Morphologically, bronchiectasis on CT
images can have a cylindrical, varicose or cystic appearance.[29] Current
Table1. Conditions associated with bronchiectasis[3,18]
Post-infectious
Mycobacterial infection, especially tuberculosis
Viral infection, such as measles, whooping cough, COVID-19
Pneumonia
Mucociliary disorders
Cystic brosis
Primary ciliary dyskinesia
Secondary to bacterial infection
Obstruction
Foreign body, tumour, mycobacterial infection
Immune dysfunction
Primary: Hypogammaglobulinaemia, selective
hyperglobulinaemia, neutrophil abnormalities
Secondary: HIV, chemotherapy, allergic bronchopulmonary
aspergillosis, malnutrition, extremes of age
Rheumatic/inammatory conditions
Rheumatoid arthritis, inammatory bowel disease
Miscellaneous
Congenital tracheobronchomegaly, Marfans syndrome,
alpha-1-antiprotease deciency syndrome, chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, aspiration
74 AJTCCM VOL. 29 NO. 2 2023
GUIDELINES
criteria for diagnosing bronchiectasis on CT
imaging include:
a broncho-arterial ratio (internal
diameter of bronchus/outer diameter
of accompanying pulmonary artery)
>1 (‘signet-ring sign’)
absence of normal airway tapering
towards the lung periphery (‘tram
track’ appearance)
visible small bronchi within 1 cm from
the costal visceral pleura or abutting
mediastinal pleura
thickened bronchial walls
thick secretions in airways
mosaic attenuation on expiratory CT
views.[6,30,31]
The fixed cut-off value for the broncho-
arterial ratio has recently been contested,
because age- and disease-related changes
in both the airway and vessel diameter can
occur that may decrease the sensitivity and
specicity of this measurement.[32] Magnetic
resonance imaging of the chest, by which
both structural and functional aspects of the
lungs can be measured, is rapidly developing
as an imaging modality for respiratory
diseases and may play an important role in
the future management of bronchiectasis.[32]
4. Management
The main principles of treating patients
with bronchiectasis are to identify and treat
the underlying cause, as well as optimally
managing secretions (oen mucopurulent),
recurrent airway infections and persistent
airway inflammation that can lead to
worsening lung function over time (Fig.2).
Exacerbations of bronchiectasis contribute
significantly to morbidity, mortality and
healthcare costs and are therefore a major
target for prevention, early recognition and
expedited treatment. An exacerbation of
bronchiectasis is dened as deterioration in
≥3of the symptoms of coughing, sputum
volume and/or consistency, sputum
purulence, dyspnoea and/or exercise
tolerance, fatigue and/or malaise, and
haemoptysis over at least a 48-hour period, in
addition to a clinicians decision that a change
in treatment for bronchiectasis is required.[33] e
frequent-exacerbator phenotype, dened as
≥3 exacerbations per year, carries the highest
risk for recurrent exacerbations, reduced
quality of life and increased mortality over a
5-year period.[34]
4.1 Airway clearance
Airway clearance techniques (ACTs) are
non-pharmacological interventions used to
facilitate removal of retained secretions from
the airways of patients with chronic respiratory
diseases such as bronchiectasis.[35] Short-term
goals for the managementofpatients living
with bronchiectasis using ACTs include
more effective removal of retained and
infected secretions to relieve symptoms of
Diagnosis
• Symptoms
Chest X-ray
HRCT (focal or diuse)
Aetiology
Focal • Diuse
• Post-infectious • Primary ciliary diseases
TB/NTM/bacteria • Immune dysfunction disorders
Childhood infections/viral • Connective tissue diseases
• Aspiration
• Obstruction
Treat the cause
For example, immunoglobulin replacement therapy for immunoglobulin deciency syndromes
Airway clearance techniques
Active cycle of breathing Oscillating positive expiratory pressure devices
Hung (direct hung) Bronchodilator
Postural drainage Mucolytics – isotonic or hypertonic saline nebulisation
Dyspnoea management Health dialogue (education)
Physical exercise Self-management
Management – phenotype specic
• Primary
Sputum culture-directed therapy
• Secondary
Targeted therapy to underlying disorder
Sputum culture-directed therapy
Frequent exacerbators
Long-term therapy – macrolides or inhaled antibiotics
Sputum culture-directed therapy
Vaccination
Annual inuenza vaccination
Pneumococcal vaccination
COVID-19 vaccination
Additional
Nutritional support Risk stratication
Diuretics for cor pulmonale FACED score
Lung transplant BSI score
Follow-up
Multidisciplinary team Dedicated bronchiectasis clinics
• Physiotherapist Work-up for lung transplant
• Microbiologist Management of underlying comorbidities
• Pulmonologist
• Dietician
Symptoms
Chest X-ray
HRCT (focal or diffuse)
Diagnosis
Focal
Diffuse
Post-infectious Primary ciliary diseases
TB / NTM / Bacterial Immune dysfunction disorders
Childhood infections / Viral Connective tissue diseases
Aspiration
Obstruction
Aetiology
For example immunoglobulin replacement therapy for immunoglobulin deficiency syndromes
Treat the cause
Active cycle of breathing Oscillating positive expiratory pressure devices
Huffing (direct huffing) Bronchodilator
Postural drainage Mucolytics -isotonic or hypertonic saline nebulisation
Dyspnoea management Health dialogue (education)
Physical exercise Self-management
Airway clearance
Primary
Sputum culture-directed therapy
Secondary
Targeted therapy to underlying disorder
Sputum culture-directed therapy
Frequent Excerbators
Long-term therapy -macrolides or inhaled antibiotics
Sputum culture-directed therapy
Management - Phenotype specific
Annual influenzae vaccination
Pneumococcal vaccination
COVID-19 vaccination
Vaccination
Nutritional support Risk stratification
Diuretics for cor pulmonale FACED score
Lung transplantation BSI score
Additional
Multi-disciplinary team Dedicated Bronchiectasis Clinics
Physiotherapist Work-up for lung transplant
Microbiologist Management of underlying co-morbidities
Pulmonologist
Dietician
Follow-up
Fig. 2. Bronchiectasis management. (HRCT = high-resolution computed tomography;
TB=tuberculosis; NTM = non-tuberculous mycobacteria; FACED = forced expiratory volume in
1second, age, colonisation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, numbers of pulmonary lobes aected
and dyspnoea; BSI = Bronchiectasis Severity Index.)
AJTCCM VOL. 29 NO. 2 2023 75
GUIDELINES
dyspnoea and to improve lung ventilation. Long-term goals for patient
management using ACTs include minimising the risk of further
airway damage, improving exercise capacity to optimise functional
independence, reducing the number of disease exacerbations and
hospitalisations per year, and improving disease-specic quality of
life (QoL) and cough-related QoL.[6,7] ACTs consist of a variety of
strategies used by physiotherapists in their management of patients
living with bronchiectasis during the acute exacerbation stage and
the chronic stage of their disease.[36] Physiotherapists are essential in
assistingand training patients with regard to the most appropriate
methods of airway clearance. CT imaging, if available, should be
reviewed to complement physiotherapy patient management by
identifying the aected lung segments.[6] e choice of ACT used
depends on preference, the age and level of comprehension of each
individual patient, and the presence or absence of contraindications
to the use of each ACT.[36] e chosen ACT should form part of the
patients daily routine. e frequency and duration of airway clearance
sessions should be tailored to the individual patients requirements
and may alter during periods of exacerbation.[6] Typically, treatment
is performed twice a day, for a minimum of 10 minutes to a maximum
of 30 minutes per session; however, during an exacerbation, treatment
frequency and duration can be adapted as required depending on each
individual patient’s clinical presentation and needs.[6]
e ACTs perceived to be most eective during acute exacerbation
and the stable stage of the disease include active cycle of breathing
technique, directed hung or forced expiratory technique, gravity-
assisted body positioning (postural drainage), modified body
positioning for postural drainage (no head-down tilt), oscillating
positive expiratory pressure (PEP) devices, continuous PEP therapy
(PEP mask), and exercise therapy.[16,34-36] Manual chest physiotherapy
techniques such as percussion, shaking and vibration combined with
gravity-assisted positioning or modied postural drainage may be used
for patients who struggle to expectorate their secretions when using
other ACTs.[6] A lesser-known but eective and inexpensive ACT is
slow expiration with the glottis held open in a lateral decubitus position
(ELTGOL – lExpiration Lente Totale Glotte Ouverte en decubitus
Latéral) and is worth considering in the management of these patients,
in isolation or in combination with other ACTs.[37]
Muco-active therapy should be considered if ACTs are not eective
and should be co-ordinated with ACTs to ensure that the overall eect
is optimal.[38] e use of mucolytic therapy in patients with non-CF
bronchiectasis has not been adequately studied. It is therefore frequently
advised to use similar guidelines as for patients with CF, where isotonic
saline or hypertonic saline nebulisation therapy is recommended as
mucolytic agent. Hypertonic saline (7%) has an immediate eect, and
ACTs should therefore be used during or directly aer administration
of this drug.[38] If hypertonic saline does not seem to enhance secretion
clearance aer 4 weeks of use, it should be stopped. Other mucolytic
agents such as carbocysteine and erdosteine can be considered, although
evidence regarding ecacy is limited.[38] Humidication with sterile
water can also be considered.
In patients with features of reactive airway disease or asthma, or
severe airow obstruction (FEV1 <1 L/min), consider pretreatment
with bronchodilator therapy before administration of muco-active
therapy and ACTs. Short-acting beta-2-agonists such as salbutamol
via a metered dose inhaler or nebuliser device are recommended.
4.2 Pulmonary rehabilitation
Pulmonary rehabilitation is dened as ‘a comprehensive intervention
based on a thorough patient assessment followed by patient-tailored
therapies that include, but are not limited to, exercise training,
education, and behavior change, designed to improve the physical
and psychological condition of people with chronic respiratory
disease and to promote the long-term adherence to health-enhancing
b e h a v i o r s ’. [39] Patients with bronchiectasis frequently present with
reduced exercise capacity, muscle weakness and low levels of physical
activity, all of which contribute to worsening dyspnoea.[40] Pulmonary
rehabilitation should be oered to patients living with bronchiectasis
who suer from shortness of breath (Modied Medical Research
Council Dyspnoea Scale ≥1) that limits their physical functioning
and those with reduced exercise capacity.[6,40] Exercise consists of
a variety of activities, such as aerobic (cardiovascular) training
and resistance (strength) training. Exercise prescription should
follow a comprehensive assessment,[40,41] be individually tailored,
and follow the principles used for chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (COPD). Inspiratory muscle training should be considered
in conjunction with exercise training to optimise training eects.[42]
Education sessions, tailored to the needs of individuals living with
bronchiectasis, form an essential part of pulmonary rehabilitation
programmes.[6,7,38] e benets of pulmonary rehabilitation include
improvements in exercise capacity, cough symptoms and QoL, and
in some cases reduced episodes of exacerbation.[43] ese benets are
usually obtained within 6 - 8 weeks of attendance and maintained
up to 6 months following completion of pulmonary rehabilitation.[7]
Maintenance programmes should be considered for patients upon
pulmonary rehabilitation programme completion. Patients who are
scheduled for surgical intervention for their bronchiectasis should
receive preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation to ensure that optimal
physical conditioning is achieved prior to surgery.[6,7]
4.3 Health dialogue (education) and self-management
Education should be provided to each individual living with
bronchiectasis, and the sessions should be tailored to the needs of
such individuals. Dialogue sessions should include explaining the
pathophysiology of the condition to the individual, identifying
appropriate ACTs to use for secretion management, management
strategies for dyspnoea during episodes of disease exacerbation,
the importance of physical exercise and hydration, and relevant
inhalation therapy.[6]
4.4 Exacerbations of bronchiectasis
Acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis are characterised by acute
bacterial infection, although viral infection may precede and trigger
this. An exacerbation of bronchiectasis is dened as a change in ≥3
of the following symptoms for >48 hours: cough, change in sputum
volume and/or consistency, sputum purulence, haemoptysis,
shortness of breath, and fatigue and/or malaise. Antibiotic therapy
is the cornerstone of treatment and reduces sputum bacterial load
as well as airway and systemic inammation.[44] erapy should
be tailored to previous sputum bacteriology results (if known), a
history of success or failure of prior regimens, and the presence of
allergy to antibiotics. Sputum should be routinely obtained for Gram
staining and culture prior to antibiotic administration. In addition
76 AJTCCM VOL. 29 NO. 2 2023
GUIDELINES
to excluding Mycobacterium tuberculosis, sputum should also be sent
for NTM culture. Patients may have received multiple courses of
antibiotics in the past, which increases the likelihood of resistant
organisms. A chest radiograph may be obtained if pneumothorax or
pneumonia is suspected.
Frequently isolated pathogens in bronchiectasis include
H.inuenzae,Moraxella catarrhalis,Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin
sensitive and resistant),P. aeruginosa(especially mucoid types), and,
less frequently,Streptococcus pneumoniae.[45,46] Afebrile and/or stable
patients can usually be treated with an oral antibiotic, while intravenous
treatment is reserved for patients with a clinical need for hospital
admission, failure of oral therapy, or pathogens that are resistant to
available oral agents. e choice of agent should be made according
to whether the colonising organism is sensitive or resistant to a beta-
lactam, and whether P. aeruginosa has been cultured. e respiratory
uoroquinolones (moxioxacin, levooxacin) are reasonable empirical
and broad-spectrum options if the sputum bacteriology is unknown.
In patients known to have P. aeruginosa airway infection and with
no quinolone resistance, ciprooxacin (500 - 750 mg twice a day) is
recommended.
Use of a single nebulised antibiotic for an infective exacerbation is
not recommended.
Clinical severity, treatment failure or conrmed resistance requires
the administration of intravenous antibiotics. In patients with
P.aeruginosa infection, the question of whether to use combination
antibiotics is controversial, and has not been well studied; a meta-
analysis of this practice in CF bronchiectasis was inconclusive.[47]
A common practice is to start with a single agent (for example, an
antipseudomonal beta-lactam cephalosporin or carbapenem) and to
add an aminoglycoside if the patient is acutely ill and pseudomonal
pneumonia seems possible. If methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is
isolated, the patient can be treated with oral linezolid, co-trimoxazole
(if sensitive) or intravenous vancomycin.
e optimal duration of therapy is not well dened but is usually
10-14 days. ere are no good-quality data comparing shorter v.
longer regimens, and the recommendation of 14 days of antibiotics
in other international guidelines is based on expert consensus only.[7]
The isolation of P. aeruginosa is an important prognostic and
therapeutic consideration in patients with bronchiectasis, as it is
associated with a decline in lung function and an increased frequency
of exacerbations, hospital admissions and deaths.[48,49] Eradication
of P.aeruginosa cultured for the rst time is an attractive treatment
target (Table2); however, data on this therapy are limited, and studies
are small. In one controlled trial, 35 patients with new P. aeruginosa
were randomised to ceazidime/tobramycin intravenously followed
by three months of nebulised tobramycin 300 mg; 12 months later,
54% of the eradication group and 29% of the placebo group were free
of P.aeruginosa in sputum.[50]
4.5 Stable bronchiectasis
Daily oral non-macrolide antibiotic therapy (for example,
amoxicillin 500 mg twice daily and doxycycline 100 mg twice
daily) for bronchiectasis has not been well studied and is reserved
for patientswith ≥3 exacerbations per year who are not candidates
for long-term macrolide administration and are not colonised
with P. aeruginosa.[51] Patients with chronic airway infection
with P. aeruginosa can try inhaled antibiotic therapy. is is an
attractive strategy for chronic suppression, as there is negligible
systemic absorption and the antibiotic reaches exponentially higher
concentrations in the airways than if given intravenously. Inhaled
antibiotic options for patients with chronic P. aeruginosa infection
include gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin and colistin. Inhaled
antibiotics should be preceded by administration of short- or long-
acting bronchodilator therapy followed by muco-active therapy and
ACTs.[7] Intermittent intravenous antibiotics are not part of routine
care outside of acute exacerbations, but may be given to patients
with resistant organisms before thoracic or non-thoracic surgery
to reduce bacterial burden and sputum production and optimise
postoperative lung function.
4.6 Anti-inammatory treatment
Patients with bronchiectasis who have recurrent exacerbations
(≥3per year) and are not colonised with P. aeruginosa should be
oered long-term anti-inammatory therapy with a macrolide.[7]
However, prior to the introduction of macrolide therapy it is important
to exclude the possibility that the cause of the bronchiectasis is
NTM, as use of a single-agent macrolide may be associated with
the development of drug-resistant NTM infection, especially
Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare, the treatment of which is
primarily macrolide based. Inpatients with chronic P. aeruginosa,
macrolides can also be added if they continue to have exacerbations
despite inhaled antipseudomonal antibiotic therapy. Macrolides are
antibiotics with anti-inammatory and immunomodulatory eects
that have been proven to signicantly reduce exacerbation frequency
in patients with bronchiectasis. eir use was extrapolated from the
CF literature, but several randomised controlled trials in patients
with non-CF bronchiectasis have conrmed their benet in terms of
reducing exacerbation frequency.[51-53] Adverse eects of macrolide
therapy include QT-interval prolongation, hearing loss and increased
bacterial resistance (Table3).[1] Inhaled corticosteroid therapy
should not be routinely provided to patients with bronchiectasis,
unless to treat a concomitant condition for which it is specically
indicated (e.g. asthma or COPD): a meta-analysis found insucient
evidence of benet.[53] A trial of therapy is therefore advised only
in adults with dicult-to-control symptoms or marked bronchial
hyper-responsiveness.
4.7 Role of surgery
Since bronchiectasis is associated with a decline in lung function over
time, a conservative approach to lung resection surgery is advised to
preserve functional lung parenchyma as much as possible. In patients
with localised bronchiectasis and recurrent infections, haemoptysis
and/or mycetoma in the affected part of the lung, or localised
infection with resistant organisms such as NTM or multidrug-
resistant or extensively drug-resistant TB, lung resection surgery
Table2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa eradication
P. aeruginosa cultured
Ciprooxacin 500 - 750 mg twice a day × 14 days followed by
inhaled colistin, gentamicin or tobramycin × 3 months
Intravenous antipseudomonal beta-lactam ± aminoglycoside
×14 days, followed by inhaled colistin, gentamicin or
tobramycin × 3 months
AJTCCM VOL. 29 NO. 2 2023 77
GUIDELINES
can be considered.[54,55] Patients with diuse bronchiectasis would
probably not benet from lung resection surgery, so medical therapy
remains the mainstay of treatment. Bilateral lung transplantation is an
option in selected patients with diuse bronchiectasis, and referral to
a specialised transplant centre should be considered.[56]
4.8 Causes of bronchiectasis with specic treatment
A rational approach to establishing an aetiological diagnosis is
required. The justification for investigating a secondary aetiology
is that in a few conditions, specific therapeutic interventions have
potential benets with minimal adverse eects. e conditions where
interventions with a specic aetiology may have a signicant impact
on outcome include immunoglobulin deciency syndromes, allergic
bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) and NTM infections. e
recommended therapy for these conditions includes intravenous or
subcutaneous immunoglobulins for patients with defective antibody
production, oral corticosteroids with antifungal agents for ABPA,
and specic antimicrobial agents if the diagnosis of NTM has been
conrmed microbiologically. e approach as described in the British
oracic Society guideline for the management of bronchiectasis[6] is
endorsed by the SATS. In general, patients with diuse bronchiectasis
would require exclusion of conditions associated with a generalised
impairment of airway mucosa function such as CF or primary ciliary
dyskinesia, or a generalised immune dysfunction disorder such as
immunoglobulin deciency or HIV. A comprehensive clinical history
and examination should guide the clinician in the extent of the
diagnostic work-up. Routine investigations would usually include a
full blood count, urea, creatinine and electrolyte prole, liver function
tests and glucose determination. Assessment for underlying common
immune dysfunction disorders includes HIV testing, IgG, IgM and IgA
evaluation, as well as IgG subclasses and pneumococcal antibody testing.
Sweat chloride or conductivity testing (see the SA consensus guideline
on the management of CF[5]) should be included in the diagnostic work-
up of patients with diuse bronchiectasis or sinobronchitis. In patients
with features of asthma, screening for ABPA should be performed by
means of total IgE, Aspergillus-specic IgE or Aspergillus precipitants.
Sputum cultures, including mycobacterial cultures, are required in
all patients with bronchiectasis. Oen an underlying cause cannot be
identied, and referral to an immunologist may be required.
4.9 Immunisations
It is advisable that all patients with underlying chronic respiratory
conditions receive vaccinations. All adults should be oered annual
influenza vaccination with the trivalent/quadrivalent inactivated
influenza vaccine.[57,58] Patients with bronchiectasis who have not
previously received a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine or whose
previous vaccination history is unknown should receive a pneumococcal
conjugate vaccine (PCV13) followed by a dose of pneumococcal
polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23).[59,60] e ecacy of pneumococcal
vaccination may be reduced in patients with immunoglobulin
deciency syndromes. Antibody titres to pneumococcal antigens may
be required to conrm an adequate immune response. An inadequate
antibody response would necessitate repeat pneumococcal vaccination.
Guidance on the timing intervals and dosing schedule are published in
the SA pneumonia guideline.[57]
Patients with bronchiectasis should also receive the COVID-19
vaccine. Data on the ecacy of all COVID-19 vaccines in this population
group, especially patients with combined variable immunodeciency
syndrome (CVID), are limited. e only data available for a similar
population group are from patients on immunosuppressive therapy
for solid-organ transplants. In this cohort of patients, the vaccine is
recommended even with the probability of reduced humoral ecacy,
as these patients have preserved cell-mediated immunity. Patients with
CVID should be immunised with two doses of COVID-19 vaccine.
[61,62] Literature to support an additional COVID-19 vaccine dose to
CVID patients is limited. However, data extrapolated from solid-organ
transplantation recipients undergoing immunosuppressive treatment
suggest that there is merit in receiving booster doses 9 months aer
receiving the last dose to counteract waning immunity.[61,62]
5. Prognosis
Age-adjusted mortality rates in patients with bronchiectasis were
double that of the general population in a UK population-based
cohort study.[11] Factors associated with a worse prognosis include
older age and comorbidities, lower FEV1, lower body mass index,
recurrent exacerbations, P. aeruginosa colonisation, a greater extent
of disease and worsening dyspnoea.[63,64] Several scoring systems,
such as the BSI,[63] accessible by means of an online calculator (http://
www.bronchiectasisseverity.com/15-2/), the Bronchiectasis Aetiology
Table3. Dierences between inhaled and oral macrolide antibiotics
Inhaled antibiotics Macrolide antibiotics
Advantages
High concentrations delivered to airways
Lower rate of resistance
Lower collateral damage
Low systemic absorption
Advantages
Easy to use, low treatment burden and relatively cheap
Reduce exacerbations
Anti-inammatory eects
Disadvantages
Concern over tolerance with nebulised formulation
Deposition erratic
Time consuming
Rotating regimens
Limited data in patients without Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Disadvantages
Gastrointestinal and other side-eects
Antibiotic resistance
Non-tuberculous mycobacteria colonisation must be excluded
Cardiovascular events/drug interactions (Q-Tc prolongation)
Long-term ecacy and tolerance
78 AJTCCM VOL. 29 NO. 2 2023
GUIDELINES
Comorbidity Index (BACI),[65] FACED[64] and
E-FACED (incorporating exacerbations),[66]
have been developed for predicting severity
and prognosis in patients with non-CF
bronchiectasis.
6. Follow-up
Bronchiectasis is a chronic condition with
variable rates of lung function decline,
dependent on colonisation with pathogenic
bacteria, especially Pseudomonas and
S. aureus, exacerbation frequency, and
adherence to airway clearance therapy.
Patients should therefore be followed up
frequently, at least 3 - 6-monthly, for clinical
review. Apart from the general history and
physical examination, adherence to ACT
schedules, as well as spirometry, should
form part of routine assessment at each visit.
Sputum for microscopy, culture and sensitivity
should be assessed 3-monthly (if possible),
and this should include culture for TB to
exclude infection with NTM. For patients
on long-term treatment with macrolides,
hearing should be assessed annually, and
macrolides should be discontinued if any
deterioration in hearing is found, while
also referring the patient appropriately for
audiology assessment.
7. Conclusion
An algorithmic approach to bronchiectasis
is provided in Fig. 3. Bronchiectasis has
largely been a neglected lung condition, but
the establishment of the EMBARC database
and recent new research into the condition
have improved the outlook for patients. We
have made progress in research into ACTs
and some progress in the use of appropriate
antibiotics for this condition. e importance
of collaboration among interprofessional
team members in patient management, with
clear communication regarding management
goals, collective planning for hospital
discharge and follow-up in the community
to ensure optimal clinical outcomes, cannot
be over-emphasised. However, several
questions remain unanswered. In SA we have
the opportunity to conduct research into the
epidemiology of bronchiectasis, post-TB
bronchiectasis, which seems to be a distinct
entity, and HIV-associated bronchiectasis.
Endorsement. The position statement has been
endorsed and approved by the Council of the SATS.
Declaration. AG-M, SDM, BA, GC, CF, and IK
are members of the editorial board.
Funding. All the work done by the writing
committee was voluntary. Some communication
costs and the transport and venue costs for the
nal meeting for some members were funded
by SATS.
Conicts of interest. None.
Disclaimer. This position statement is only
intended for guidance on general management
of patients. Each patient must be individually
managed. e nal responsibility for management
of any patient rests on the managing physician
and healthcare provider.
1. McShane PJ, Tino G. Bronchiectasis. Chest
2019;155(4):825-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
chest.2018.10.027
2. Shteinberg M, Flume PA, Chalmers JD. Is bronchiectasis
really a disease? Eur Respir Rev 2020;29(155):190051.
https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0051-2019
3. King P. Pathogenesis of bronchiectasis. Paediatr Respir
Rev 2011;12(2):104-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
prrv.2010.10.011
4. Flume PA, Chalmers JD, Olivier KN. Advances in
bronchiectasis: Endotyping, genetics, microbiome, and
disease heterogeneity. Lancet 2018;392(10150):880-890.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31767-7
5. Zampoli M, Morrow B, eds. The South African cystic
brosis consensus guidelines: Fih edition, 2017. South
African Cystic Fibrosis Association, 2017. https://sacfa.
org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017_09_14_CF_Consensus_
Guidelines_2017.pdf (accessed 19 March 2021).
6. Hill AT, Sullivan AL, Chalmers JD, et al. British
oracic Society guideline for bronchiectasis in adults.
orax 2019;74(Suppl 1):1-69. https://doi.org/10.1136/
thoraxjnl-2018-212463
7. Polverino E, Goeminne PC, McDonnell MJ,
et al. European Respiratory Society guidelines
for the management of adult bronchiectasis.
Eur Respir J 2017;50(3):1700629. https://doi.
org/10.1183/13993003.00629-2017
8. Weycker D, Hansen GL, Seifer FD. Prevalence and
incidence of noncystic brosis bronchiectasis among
US adults in 2013. Chron Respir Dis 2017;14(4):377-
384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479972317709649
Request chest X-ray
Chest x-ray in keeping
with bronchiectasis?
No
Request thin-slice CT chest
or high-resolution CT
Consider alternative
diagnosis
Airway clearance
techniques
Yes
If underlying cause
is identied,
treat specically
Vaccination:
Inuenza,
pneumococcal,
SARS-CoV-2
Antibiotics
General management
of bronchiectasis
Other: Nutrition,
diuretics,
lung transplant
Risk factors, symptoms and/or signs suggestive of bronchiectasis?
CT chest in keeping
with bronchiectasis?
No
Bronchiectasis conrmed
Routine tests: FBC, U&E and creatinine,
LFTs, glucose, HIV, sputum MCS
and TB culture
Further tests guided by clinical history
and ndings on examination: IgG, IgM,
IgA, IgG subclasses, total IgE,
Aspergillus IgE, sweat chloride
or conductivity, nasal or bronchial
mucosa biopsy
Fig.3. Algorithmic approach to bronchiectasis. (CT = computed tomography; FBC = full blood
count; U&E = urea and electrolytes; LFTs = liver function tests; MCS = microscopy, culture
and sensitivity; TB = tuberculosis; IgG = immunoglobulin G; IgM = immunoglobulin M;
IgA=immunoglobulin A; IgE = immunoglobulin E.)
AJTCCM VOL. 29 NO. 2 2023 79
GUIDELINES
9. Henkle E, Chan B, Curtis JR, Aksamit TR, Daley CL, Winthrop KL. Characteristics
and health-care utilisation history of patients with bronchiectasis in US Medicare
enrollees with prescription drug plans, 2006 to 2014. Chest 2018;154(6):1311-1320.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2018.07.014
10. Aksamit TR, O’Donnell AE, Barker A, etal. Adult patients with bronchiectasis: A rst
look at the US Bronchiectasis Research Registry. Chest 2017;151(5):982-992. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.055
11. Quint JK, Millett ERC, Joshi M, etal. Changes in the incidence, prevalence and
mortality of bronchiectasis in the UK from 2004 to 2013: A population-based cohort
study. Eur Respir J 2016;47(1):186-193. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01033-2015
12. Ringshausen FC, de Roux A, Diel R, Hohmann D, Welte T, Rademacher J.
Bronchiectasis in Germany: A population-based estimation of disease prevalence.
Eur Respir J 2015;46(6):1805-1807. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00954-2015
13. Dhar R, Singh S, Talwar D, etal. Bronchiectasis in India: Results from the European
Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC)
and Respiratory Research Network of India Registry. Lancet Glob Health
2019;7(9):e1269-e1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30327-4
14. Lin JL, Xu JF, Qu JM. Bronchiectasis in China. Ann Am oracic Soc 2016;13(5):609-
616. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-740PS
15. Chandrasekaran R, Mac Aogáin M, Chalmers JD, Elborn SJ, Chotirmall SH. Geographic
variation in the aetiology, epidemiology and microbiology of bronchiectasis. BMC
Pulm Med 2018;18(1):83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0638-0
16. Ferrand RA, Desai SR, Hopkins C, etal. Chronic lung disease in adolescents with
delayed diagnosis of vertically acquired HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55(1):145-
152. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis271
17. Desai SR, Nair A, Rylance J, etal. Human immunodeciency virus-associated chronic
lung disease in children and adolescents in Zimbabwe: Chest radiographic and high-
resolution computed tomographic ndings. Clin Infect Dis 2018;66(2):274-281.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix778
18. Chalmers JD, Chang AB, Chotirmall SH, Dhar R, McShane PJ. Bronchiectasis. Nature
Rev Dis Primers 2018;4(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-018-0042-3
19. Visser SK, Bye PTP, Fox GJ, etal. Australian adults with bronchiectasis: e rst report
from the Australian Bronchiectasis Registry. Respir Med 2019;155:97-103. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.rmed.2019.07.016
20. Lonni S, Chalmers JD, Goeminne PC, et al. Etiology of non-cystic fibrosis
bronchiectasis in adults and its correlation to disease severity. Ann Am orac Soc
2015;12(12):1764-1770. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201507-472OC
21. Dodd PJ, Yuen CM, Jayasooriya SM, van der Zalm MM, Seddon JA. Quantifying
the global number of tuberculosis survivors: A modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis
2021;21(7):984-992. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30919-1
22. Ravimohan S, Kornfeld H, Weissman D, Bisson GP. Tuberculosis and lung damage:
From epidemiology to pathophysiology. Eur Respir Rev 2018;27(147):170077. https://
doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0077-2017
23. Huang HY, Chung FT, Lo CY, etal. Etiology and characteristics of patients with
bronchiectasis in Taiwan: A cohort study from 2002 to 2016. BMC Pulm Med
2020;20(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-1080-7
24. Meghji J, Simpson H, Bertel Squire S, Mortimer K. A systematic review of the
prevalence and pattern of imaging defined post-TB lung disease. PLoS ONE
2016;11(8):0161176. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161176
25. Meghji J, Lesosky M, Joekes E, etal. Patient outcomes associated with post-tuberculosis
lung damage in Malawi: A prospective cohort study. orax 2020;75(3):269-278.
https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213808
26. Allwood B, van der Zalm M, Amaral A, etal. Post-tuberculosis lung health: Perspectives
from the First International Symposium. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2020;24(8):820-828.
https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.20.0067
27. Mkoko P, Naidoo S, Mbanga LC, Nomvete F, Muloiwa R, Dlamini S. Chronic lung
disease and a history of tuberculosis (post-tuberculosis lung disease): Clinical features
and in-hospital outcomes in a resource-limited setting with a high HIV burden. S Afr
Med J 2019;109(3):169-173. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i3.13366
28. Wang H, Ji XB, Li CW, etal. Clinical characteristics and validation of bronchiectasis
severity score systems for post-tuberculosis bronchiectasis. Clin Respir J
2018;12(8):2346-2353. https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.12911
29. Schäfer J, Griese M, Chandrasekaran R, Chotirmall SH, Hartl D. Pathogenesis,
imaging and clinical characteristics of CF and non-CF bronchiectasis. BMC Pulm
Med 2018;18:79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0630-8
30. Singh A, Bhalla AS, Jana M. Bronchiectasis revisited: Imaging-based pattern approach
to diagnosis. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2019;48(1):53-60. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.
cpradiol.2017.12.001
31. Brody AS, Klein JS, Molina PL, Quan J, Bean JA, Wilmott RW. High-resolution
computed tomography in young patients with cystic fibrosis: Distribution of
abnormalities and correlation with pulmonary function tests. J Pediatr 2004;145(1):32-
38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.02.038
32. Tiddens HAWM, Meerburg JJ, van der Eerden MM, Ciet P. e radiological diagnosis
of bronchiectasis: Whats in a name? Eur Respir Rev 2020;29(156):190120. https://doi.
org/10.1183/16000617.0120-2019
33. Hill AT, Haworth CS, Aliberti S, et al. Pulmonary exacerbation in adults
with bronchiectasis: A consensus definition for clinical research. Eur Respir J
2017;49(6):1700051. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00051-2017
34. Chalmers J, Aliberti S, Filonenko A, etal. Characterization of the ‘frequent exacerbator
phenotype’ in bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018;197(11):1410-1420.
https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201711-2202OC
35. Lee AL, Burge AT, Holland AE. Airway clearance techniques for bronchiectasis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD008351. https://doi.
org/10.1002/14651858.CD008351
36. Phillips J, Lee A, Pope R, Hing W. Physiotherapists’ use of airway clearance techniques
during an acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis: A survey study. Arch Physiother
2021;11(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-020-00097-5
37. Wong C, Sullivan C, Jayaram L. ELTGOL airway clearance in bronchiectasis:
Laying the bricks of evidence. Eur Respir J 2018;51(1):1702232. https://doi.
org/10.1183/13993003.02232-2017
38. O’Neill K, O’Donnell AE, Bradley JM. Airway clearance, mucoactive therapies and
pulmonary rehabilitation in bronchiectasis. Respirology 2019;24(3):227-237. https://
doi.org/10.1111/resp.13459
39. Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, etal. An official American Thoracic Society/
European Respiratory Society statement: Key concepts and advances in pulmonary
rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;188(8):e13-e64. https://doi.
org/10.1164/rccm.201309-1634ST
40. Granger CL, Morris NR, Holland AE. Practical approach to establishing pulmonary
rehabilitation for people with non-COPD diagnoses. Respirology 2019;24(9):879-888.
https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.13562
41. Holland AE, Cox NS, Houchen-Wolloff L, etal. Defining modern pulmonary
rehabilitation: An ocial American oracic Society Workshop report. Ann Am
orac Soc 2021;18(5):e12-e29. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202102-146ST
42. Ozalp O, Inal-Ince D, Cakmak A, etal. High-intensity inspiratory muscle training
in bronchiectasis: A randomised controlled trial. Respirology 2019;24(3):246-253.
https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.13397
43. Lee AL, Hill CJ, McDonald CF, Holland AE. Pulmonary rehabilitation in individuals
with non-cystic brosis bronchiectasis: A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehab
2017;98(4):774-782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.017
44. Chalmers JD, Aliberti S, Blasi F. Management of bronchiectasis in adults. Eur Respir J
2015;45(5):1446-1462. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00119114
45. Angrill J, Agustí C, de Celis R, et al. Bacterial colonisation in patients with
bronchiectasis: Microbiological pattern and risk factors. orax 2002;57(1):15-19.
https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax.57.1.15
46. Pasteur MC, Helliwell SM, Houghton SJ, etal. An investigation into causative factors
in patients with bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162(4 Pt 1):1277-
1284. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.162.4.9906120
47. Elphick HE, Tan AA. Single versus combination intravenous antibiotic therapy for
people with cystic brosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005, Issue 2. Art. No.:
CD002007. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002007.pub2
48. Araújo D, Shteinberg M, Aliberti S, et al. The independent contribution of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection to long-term clinical outcomes in bronchiectasis.
Eur Respir J 2018;51(2):1701953. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01953-2017
49. Finch S, McDonnell MJ, Abo-Leyah H, Aliberti S, Chalmers JD. A comprehensive
analysis of the impact of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonisation on prognosis in adult
bronchiectasis. Ann Am orac Soc 2015;12(11):1602-1611. https://doi.org/10.1513/
AnnalsATS.201506-333OC
50. Orriols R, Hernando R, Ferrer A, Terradas S, Montoro B. Eradication therapy
against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in non-cystic brosis bronchiectasis. Respiration
2015;90(4):299-305. https://doi.org/10.1159/000438490
51. Pasteur MC, Bilton D, Hill AT; British oracic Society Bronchiectasis (non-CF)
Guideline Group. British oracic Society guideline for non-CF bronchiectasis.
orax 2010;65(Suppl 1):1-58. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2010.136119
52. Wong C, Jayaram L, Karalus N, etal. Azithromycin for prevention of exacerbations
in non-cystic brosis bronchiectasis (EMBRACE): A randomised, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2012;380(9842):660-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(12)60953-2
53. Kapur N, Petsky HL, Bell S, Kolbe J, Chang AB. Inhaled corticosteroids for
bronchiectasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018, Issue 5. Art. No.: CD000996. https://
doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000996.pub3
54. Calligaro GL, Moodley L, Symons G, Dheda K. e medical and surgical treatment of
drug-resistant tuberculosis. J orac Dis 2014;6(3):186-195. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.
issn.2072-1439.2013.11.11
55. Yu JA, Pomerantz M, Bishop A, Weyant MJ, Mitchell JD. Lady Windermere revisited:
Treatment with thoracoscopic lobectomy/segmentectomy for right middle lobe and
lingular bronchiectasis associated with non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease. Eur J
Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40(3):671-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.12.028
56. Calligaro GL, Brink J, Williams P, Geldenhuys A, Sussman M, Pennel T. Lung
transplantation in South Africa: Indications, outcomes and disease-specific referral
guidelines. Afr J orac Crit Care Med 2018;24(3):118-122. https://doi.org/10.7196/
SARJ.2018.v24i3.217
80 AJTCCM VOL. 29 NO. 2 2023
GUIDELINES
57. Boyles TH, Brink A, Calligaro GL, etal. South African guideline for the management of
community-acquired pneumonia in adults. J orac Dis 2017;9(6):1469-1502. https://doi.
org/10.21037/jtd.2017.05.31
58. Van Zyl-Smit RN, Feldman C, Richards G, etal. South African oracic Society statement on
obstructive airways disease and COVID-19. Afr J orac Crit Care Med 2020;26(3):117-118.
https://doi.org/10.7196/AJTCCM.2020.v26i3.111
59. Ameratunga R, Longhurst H, Steele R, etal. Common variable immunodeciency disorders,
T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and the risk of chronic COVID-19. J Allergy Clin
Immunol Pract 2021;9(10):3575-3583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2021.06.019
60. Salinas AF, Mortari EP, Terreri S, etal. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine induced atypical immune
responses in antibody defects: Everybody does their best. J Clin Immunol 2021;41:1709-
1722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-021-01133-0
61. Kamar N, Abravanel F, Marion O, Couat C, Izopet J, del Bello A. ree doses of an mRNA
Covid-19 vaccine in solid-organ transplant recipients. N Engl J Med 2021;385(7):661-662.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2108861
62. Arbel R, Hammerman A, Sergienko R, etal. BNT162b2 vaccine booster and mortality
due to Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2021;385(26):2413-2420. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJMoa2115624
63. Chalmers JD, Goeminne P, Aliberti S, et al. The bronchiectasis severity index:
An international derivation and validation study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2014;189(5):576-585. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201309-1575OC
64. Martinez-García MÁ, de Gracia J, Relat MV, etal. Multidimensional approach to non-
cystic brosis bronchiectasis: e FACED score. Eur Respir J 2014;43(5):1357-1367.
https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00026313
65. McDonnell MJ, Aliberti S, Goeminne PC, etal. Comorbidities and the risk of mortality
in patients with bronchiectasis: An international cohort study. Lancet Respir Med
2016;4(12):969-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30320-4
66. Martinez-García M, Athanazio R, Girón R, etal. Predicting high risk of exacerbations
in bronchiectasis: e E-FACED score. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2017;12:275-
284. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S121943
Submitted 12 December 2022. Accepted 10 May 2023. Published July 2023.