An open intensive care unit (ICU) model is a viable option for the acute expansion of ICU capacity in the state sector: A study of a needs-based strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary ICU in South Africa
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Both open and closed intensive care unit (ICU) models are used in South Africa (SA). The literature is unclear with regard to which model is superior. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a critical care resource crisis that necessitated expansion of critical care capacity, often beyond the resources required to meet the structure of a closed ICU in the institutions using that model.
Objectives. This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of non-COVID patients in a closed ICU setting and a temporary open unit that ran parallel to it during the pandemic, in order to assess this type of resource expansion as a viable option.
Methods. Data from the Intensive Care Electronic Record System in the Greys Hospital ICU in Pietermaritzburg, SA, were analysed for patients aged ≥12 years admitted to either the open or the closed ICU between April and August 2020. Data missing from the database were completed by referring to the medical records office. The primary outcome assessed was mortality, while secondary outcomes included adverse events and hospital length of stay.
Results. There was no significant mortality difference between the ICU components (16.9% in the open-model group v. 15.1% in the closed- model group; p=0.769). The incidence of adverse events also did not differ (45.5% in the open model v. 38.9% in the closed model; p=0.357).
Conclusion. Patients requiring ICU admission have complex conditions or have undergone extensive surgery, necessitating specialised treatment and careful monitoring. In the event of an acute surge event, expanding ICU capacity by adding an open-model component in a setting that traditionally runs closed models may be an effective strategy to assist in the management of critically ill patients without significantly affecting outcomes.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
Joynt, G., et al., The critical care society of Southern Africa consensus statement on ICU triage and rationing (ConICTri). Southern African Journal of Critical Care (Online), 2019. 35(1): p. 36-52.
Liebman, B., et al., Effects of organizational change in the ICU on high-risk surgical patients: a comparison of open and closed formats. Critical Care, 2009. 13(Suppl 1): p. P483.
Scribante, J. and S. Bhagwanjee, National audit of critical care resources in South Africa - transfer of critically ill patients. S Afr Med J, 2007. 97(12 Pt 3): p. 1323-6.
Naidoo, K., J. Singh, and U. Lalloo, A critical analysis of ICU/HC beds in South Africa: 2008-2009. S Afr Med J, 2013. 103(10): p. 751-3.
Chowdhury, D. and A.K. Duggal, Intensive care unit models: Do you want them to be open or closed? A critical review. Neurology India, 2017. 65(1): p. 39.
Turnbull, A.E., et al., Competing and conflicting interests in the care of critically ill patients. Intensive care medicine, 2018. 44: p. 1628-1637.
Liberati, E.G., M. Gorli, and G. Scaratti, Invisible walls within multidisciplinary teams: disciplinary boundaries and their effects on integrated care. Social Science & Medicine, 2016. 150: p. 31-39.
Burchardi, H. and O. Moerer, Twenty-four hour presence of physicians in the ICU. Critical Care, 2001. 5(3): p. 1-7.
Bhattacharya, P.K., et al., Critical care as a career for anaesthesiologists. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2021. 65(1): p. 48.
Hyzy, R.C., et al., Characteristics of intensive care units in Michigan: not an open and closed case. J Hosp Med, 2010. 5(1): p. 4-9.
Fuchs, R.J., S.M. Berenholtz, and T. Dorman, Do intensivists in ICU improve outcome? Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 2005. 19(1): p. 125-135.
Yang, Q., J.L. Du, and F. Shao, Mortality rate and other clinical features observed in Open vs closed format intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019. 98(27): p. e16261.
Weissman, G.E. and S.D. Halpern, Evidence supports the superiority of closed ICUs for patients and families: No. Intensive Care Med, 2017. 43(1): p. 124-127.
Chittawatanarat, K. and T. Pamorsinlapathum, Effects of a closed ICU model on a general surgical ICU. Critical Care, 2009. 13(1): p. P479.
Levy, M.M., et al., Association between critical care physician management and patient mortality in the intensive care unit. Annals of internal medicine, 2008. 148(11): p. 801-809.
Harris, D.D., et al., The impact of single family room design on patients and caregivers: executive summary. Journal of Perinatology, 2006. 26(3): p. S38-S48.