Assessing and comparing chest radiograph interpretation in the Department of Internal Medicine at the University of the Witwatersrand medical school, according to seniority
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Chest radiographs are a common diagnostic tool in the internal medicine department, and correct interpretation is imperative for adequate patient management.
Objective. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of common pathologies in South Africa that are evident on chest radiographs, and to determine whether there are discrepancies according to different levels of qualification of doctors rotating through the internal medicine department, and which factors contribute to an accurate diagnosis.
Method. Fifteen chest radiographs with common pathologies were given to all doctors rotating through the Department of Internal Medicine at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, and they were asked to interpret them. Information pertaining to their experience, designation and confidence in chest radiograph interpretation was also obtained.
Results. Diagnostic accuracy according to years of experience was as follows: 0 - 5 years 27.0%, 6 - 10 years 43.0%, and >10 years 47.9%. For different designations, accuracy was as follows: consultants 50.5%, registrars 40.9%, medical officers 36.4%, and interns 19.5%. Participants who were confident obtained a mean score of 39.4% and those who were not, a mean score of 31.6%.
Conclusion. Chest radiographs are readily accessible and used daily in clinical practice in numerous facilities. An accurate diagnosis is important to provide quality healthcare. Improved training in interpretation for all, but especially for junior doctors, should be a priority in our training facilities.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
KanneJ,ThoongsuwanN,SternE.Commonerrorsandpitfallsininterpretationofthe adult chest radiograph. Clin Pulm Med 2005;12(2):97-114. https://doi.org/10.1097/01. cpm.0000156704.33941.e2
Mehrotra P, Bosemani V, Cox J. Do radiologists still need to report chest x rays? Postgrad Med J 2009;85(1005):339-341. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2007.066712 3. Pfeifer M. Nonradiologists reading radiographs: Good medicine or stretching the scope of practice? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2001;15(6):675-676. https://doi.
org/10.1053/jcan.2001.29021
Colleges of Medicine of South Africa. Regulations for admission to the Fellowship of the College of Physicians of South Africa FCP(SA). March 2019. https://www.cmsa. co.za/view_exam.aspx?QualificationID=28 (accessed 1 February 2021).
Colleges of Medicine of South Africa. Portfolio of learning: Fellowship of the College of Physicians of South Africa FCP(SA). 2021. https://www.cmsa.co.za/view_exam. aspx?QualificationID=28 (accessed 1 February 2021).
Mayhue F, Rust D, Aldag J, Jenkins A, Ruthman J. Accuracy of interpretations of emergency department radiographs: Effect of confidence levels. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18(8):826-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80205-7
Potchen EJ, Cooper TG, Sierra AE, et al. Measuring performance in chest radiography. Radiology 2000;217(2):456-459. https://doi.org/10.1148/ radiology.217.2.r00nv14456
Sunshine J, Bansal S, Evens R. Radiology performed by nonradiologists in the United States: Who does what? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161(2):419-429. https:// doi.org/10.2214/ajr.161.2.8333388
Gatt M. Chest radiographs in the emergency department: Is the radiologist really necessary? Postgrad Med J 2003;79(930):214-217. https://doi.org/10.1136/ pmj.79.930.214
Eng J, Mysko W, Weller G, et al. Interpretation of emergency department radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175(5):1233-1238. https://doi.org/10.2214/ ajr.175.5.1751233
Nakajima Y, Yamada K, Imamura K, Kobayashi K. Radiologist supply and workload: International comparison – Working Group of Japanese College of Radiology. Radiat Med 2008;26(8):455-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-008-0259-2
Benger J, Lyburn I. What is the effect of reporting all emergency department radiographs? Emerg Med J 2003;20(1):40-43. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.20.1.40
Eisen L, Berger J, Hegde A, Schneider R. Competency in chest radiography: A comparison of medical students, residents and fellows. Chest 2005;128(4):343S. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.128.4_meetingabstracts.343s-a
Mehdipoor G, Salmani F, Arjmand Shabestari A. Survey of practitioners’ competency for diagnosis of acute diseases manifest on chest X-ray. BMC Med Imaging 2017;17(1):49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-017-0222-8
Satia I, Bashagha S, Bibi A, Ahmed R, Mellor S, Zaman F. Assessing the accuracy and certainty in interpreting chest X-rays in the medical division. Clin Med 2013;13(4):349-352. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.13-4-349
Dawes T, Vowler S, Allen C, Dixon A. Training improves medical student performance in image interpretation. Br J Radiol 2004;77(921):775-776. https:// doi.org/10.1259/bjr/66388556
Maleck M, Fischer M, Kammer B, et al. Do computers teach better? A media comparison study for case-based teaching in radiology. Radiographics 2001;21(4):1025-1032. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.21.4.g01jl26799
Schreiber M. The clinical history as a factor in roentgenogram interpretation. JAMA 1963;185(5):399. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1963.03060050077027
Loy C, Irwig L. Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information. JAMA 2004;292(13):1602-1609. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jama.292.13.1602