Beyond reproductive rights: Advocating for access to assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) for socially infertile individuals using the right to benefit from scientific progress – lessons for African countries

Main Article Content

N Mthembu

Abstract





Scientific and technological innovations have increasingly enabled humans to overcome biological limitations. Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), for instance, offer persons facing medical or social barriers to parenthood the opportunity to realise their dream of building a family. However, in many African Anglophone countries, persons who are socially infertile—gay and single persons—are legally excluded from accessing ARTs to build their families. Relying on reproductive rights to argue against these inhibitive legal provisions may offer some hope, but reproductive rights are often narrowly interpreted to apply only to natural reproduction, excluding ARTs. This paper addresses this gap by exploring the possibility of relying on the right to benefit from scientific progress as a basis for challenging the inhibitive legal provisions. The right to benefit from scientific progress seems promising, as it is widely recognised in international human rights instruments and clearly encompasses ARTs as a scientific advancement. The right could therefore be essential in expanding access to ARTs for socially infertile persons in Africa.





Article Details

How to Cite
Beyond reproductive rights: Advocating for access to assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) for socially infertile individuals using the right to benefit from scientific progress – lessons for African countries. (2024). South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 17(3), e2061. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2024.v17i3.2061
Section
Review Articles

How to Cite

Beyond reproductive rights: Advocating for access to assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) for socially infertile individuals using the right to benefit from scientific progress – lessons for African countries. (2024). South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 17(3), e2061. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2024.v17i3.2061

References

1. Molnár-Gábor F. Implementing the human right to science in the context of health-related data processing. J Law Biosci 2024;11(1):1-20. https://doi. org/10.1093/jlb/lsae004

2. Shawa R, Coomans F, Cox H, London L. A promising potential: Using the right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress to advance public health in Africa. Afr Hum Rights Law J 2023;23:30-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2023/ v23n1a2

3. Donders Y. The right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress: In search of state obligations in relation to health. Med Health Care Philos 2011;14(4):371-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9327-y

4. Besson S. The ‘Human Right to Science’ qua right to participate in science. Int J Hum Rights 2023;28(4):497-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2023.2251897

5. Lobler H. Human’s relationship to nature. J Services Marketing 2017;31(1):73-82.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2016-0037

6. Liao P, Dollin P. Half a century of the oral contraceptive pill. Can Fam Physician 2012;58(12):757-760.

7. Shozi B. A Human rights analysis of posthumous reproduction in SA. LLM thesis. University of KwaZulu Natal, 2018. https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/server/api/ core/bitstreams/6c944008-419d-45a5-b1dc-1e94e6dc4f46/content (accessed 7 August 2024).

8. Adewumi A. The need for assisted reproductive technology law in Nigeria. University of Ibadan Law J 2012;2(1):19-41. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3758856

9. Savasi V, Mandia L, Laoreti A, Cetin I. Reproductive assistance in HIV

serodiscordant couples. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19(2):136-150. https://doi.

org/10.1093/humupd/dms046

10. Marques C, Guerreiro C, Soares SR. Lights and shadows about the effectiveness of IVF in HIV infected women: A systematic review. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2015;2015(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/517208

11. Mahabeer I, Gilbert L, Schwartz S. Guideline on safer conception in fertile HIV- infected individuals and couples. South Afr J HIV Med 2011;12(2):31-44. https:// doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v12i2.196

12. Cavaliere G. A 14-day limit for bioethics: The debate over human embryo research. BMC Med Ethics 2017;18(38):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0198-5

13. Purdy LM. Genetics and reproductive risk: Can having children be immoral? Reprod Persons: Issues in Feminist Bioethics; Cornell University Press 1996:35-49. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501729553-003

14. Murphy J. Should lesbians count as infertile couples? Antilesbian discrimination in assisted reproduction. Embodying bioethics: Recent feminist advances (new feminist’s perspectives). Boston: Rowman and Littlefield 1999:103-120.

15. Rank N. Barriers for access to assisted reproductive technologies by lesbian women: The search for parity within the healthcare system. Houston J Health Law Policy 2010;10:115-145. https://www.law.uh.edu/hjhlp/volumes/Vol_10_1/Rank. pdf (accessed 6 August 2024).

16. Lo W, Campo-Engelstein L. Expanding the clinical definition of infertility to include socially infertile individuals and couples. In Reproductive Ethics II: New ideas and innovations. Springer International Publishing, 2018:71-83.

17. Freire AD, Brito LG, Araújo RJ, Medeiros RV. Regulating public policy regarding assisted reproduction for seroconcordant homosexual couples. Rev Bioét 2020;27(4):756-763. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422019274359

18. Ali SF, Shaikh A, Farid-ul-Hasnain S. Knowledge, perceptions and myths regarding infertility among selected adult population in Pakistan: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pub Health 2011;760:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-760

19. World Health Organization. Infertility. 2024. https://www.who.int/news-room/ fact-sheets/detail/infertility (accessed on 07 August 2024).

20. Liu G, Zhang H, Zhu WB. HIV prevalence among 338 432 infertile individuals in Hunan, China, 2020-2018: A cross sectional study. PloS One 2020;15(9):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238564

21. Dierickx S, Balen J, Longman C, et al. ‘We are always desperate and will try anything to conceive’: The convoluted and dynamic process of health seeking among women with infertility in the West Coast Region of The Gambia. PloS One 2019;14(1):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211634

22. Solanke BL, Bisiriyu AL, Oyedokun A. Is the likelihood of spousal violence lower or higher among childless women? Evidence from Nigeria demographic and health surveys. BMC Women’s Health 2018;18(20):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12905-018-0514-3

23. Mthembu N. A comparative and human rights analysis of the regulation of assisted reproduction in African Anglophone countries. LLM thesis. University of KwaZulu-Natal, 2021.

24. See draft law 47, 14 regarding Medical Assisted Reproductive Techniques submitted in February 2016 and adopted in July 2018 by the Moroccan government.

25. Kooli C. Review of assisted reproduction techniques, laws, and regulations in Muslim countries. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2020;24(8):1-15. https://doi. org/10.1186/s43043-019-0011-0

26. Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter CH, Kupka MS, et al. Survey on ART and IUI: Legislation, regulation, funding and registries in European countries: The European IVF- monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod Open 2020;2020(1):1-15. https://doi. org/10.1093/humrep/deae163

27. Nigeria. Same–sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act, 2013. Available at https://www. icnl.org/wp-content/uploads/Nigeria_marriageact.pdf (accessed 6 August 2024).

28. Botswana has recently decriminalised homosexuality in the case of Letsweletse Motshidieman v Attorney General [2019] MAHGB-000591-16 (High Court of Botswana). Full judgement available at https://www. southernafricalitigationcentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Botswana- decrim-judgment.pdf (accessed 6 August 2024).

29. Kenya Reproductive Health Bill 2019. Available at http://www.parliament.go.ke/ sites/default/files/2020-02/Reproductive%20Healthcare%20Bill%2C%202019. pdf (accessed 6 August 2024).

30. Kenya Penal Code chapter 63. Available at https://www.kenyapolice.go.ke/ downloads/category/5-acts.html?download=7:penal-code-cap-63 (accessed 6 August 2024).

31. The Assisted Reproductive Technology Bill, 2022. Available at

https://kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownloads/bills/2022/

TheAssistedReproductiveTechnologyBill_2022.pdf (accessed 6 August 2024).

32. Constitution of Kenya, 2010. Available at https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/

ken127322.pdf (accessed 6 August 2024).

33. Hunt J, Bristowe K, Chidyamatare S, Harding R. They will be afraid to touch you:

LGBTI people and sex workers’ experience of accessing healthcare in Zimbabwe - an in-depth qualitative study. BMC Glob Health 2017;2(2):1-7. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000168

34. See article 27 of the UDHR. Available at https://www.un.org/en/about-us/ universal-declaration-of-human-rights (accessed 6 August 2024).

35. See article 15 of ICESCR. Available at https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments- mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and- cultural-rights (accessed 6 August 2024).

36. Mann S, Donders Y, Mitchell C, et al. Advocating for science progress as a human right. Proceed National Acad Sci 2018;115(43):10820-10823. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1816320115

37. Boggio A, Ho C. The Human right to science and foundational technologies. Am J Bioethics 2018;18(12):69-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1531173

38. Romanio C, Boggio A. The right to benefit from progress in science and technology in world constitutions. An entry in Max Plank Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law (forthcoming). Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper, 2020(2020-17). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3618685

39. Jordaan D. Criteria for pre-embryo research in South Africa: An analysis within the paradigm of respect for the pre-embryo. Med Law J 2008;27(2):417-437.

40. Taupitz J, Testa G, Sugarman J. Rethinking human embryo research policies. Hastings Centre Report 2021;51(1):47-51.

41. The 6th meeting of the World Congress for Freedom of Scientific Research co- organised by Associazione Luca Coscioni, Science for Democracy and the African Union. Available at https://www.aatf-africa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ Book-of-abstracts-WGFSR-.pdf (accessed 6 August 2024).

42. Article 33 of the Kenyan Constitution, 2010. https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/ ken127322.pdf (accessed 6 August 2024).

43. Section 35 of the Lesotho Constitution. https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/ les129835.pdf (accessed 7 August 2024).

44. Article 26 of the Morocco Constitution. https://www.constituteproject.org/ constitution/Morocco_2011 (accessed 7 August 2024).

45. Section 16 of the South African Constitution. https://www.justice.gov.za/ constitution/SAConstitution-web-eng.pdf (accessed 7 August 2024).

46. Section 61 of the National Constitution of Zimbabwe. https://faolex.fao.org/ docs/pdf/zim127325.pdf (accessed on 7 August 2024.

47. African Charter on Human and Peoples rights. https://au.int/sites/default/ files/treaties/36390-treaty-0011_-_african_charter_on_human_and_peoples_

rights_e.pdf (accessed 6 August 2024).