Enhancing data governance in collaborative research: Introducing SA DTA 1.1
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. The SA DTA was updated to better serve the South African research community by providing clarity on exactly when – at what stage during research – institutions hold rights to the data they generate in collaborative research contexts where raw data are received and integrated with other data. SA DTA 1.1 introduces significant enhancements in data governance, focusing on the explicit definition and management of ‘inferential data’.
Objectives. To introduce SA DTA 1.1 and demonstrate its practical application in real-world research contexts.
Methods. Using a descriptive design, the study presents two practical case studies: one involving two universities and another a university and a pharmaceutical company. The first case focuses on identifying genetic markers for neurodegenerative diseases, while the second addresses genetic markers for chronic diseases.
Results. In the first case study, the entity conducting the analysis generated inferential data independently, thereby gaining sole rights in such data. In the second case study, both collaborating entities contributed to the data analysis, leading to joint rights in the inferential data. These findings demonstrate the flexibility and clarity provided by SA DTA 1.1 in managing data ownership and intellectual property rights.
Conclusion. SA DTA 1.1 significantly advances data governance by providing clear and adaptable guidelines for data rights in collaborative research. It supports ethical and efficient data sharing, protecting researchers’ interests and fostering global scientific innovation.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The SAJBL is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
Colcelli V. Applying national law in cross-border research activity. In: Colcelli V, Cippitani R, Brochhausen-Delius C, Arnold R, eds. GDPR Requirements for Biobanking Activities Across Europe. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature, 2023;39-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42944-6_5
Swales L, Ogendi P, Botes M, et al. A data transfer agreement template for South Africa. Zenodo 2023. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7537396
Swales L, Botes M, Donnelly DL, Thaldar D. Towards a data transfer agreement for the South African research community: The empowerment approach. S Afr J Bioethics Law 2023;16(1):13-18. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2023.v16i1.827
Townsend B. The lawful sharing of health research data in South Africa and beyond. Inform Commun Techn Law 2022;31(1):17-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13600834.2021.1918905
Mahomed S, Loots G, Staunton C. The role of Data Transfer Agreements in ethically managing data sharing for research in South Africa. S Afr J Bioethics Law 2022;15(1):26-30. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2022.v15i1.807
Thaldar D, Botes M, Swales L, Esselaar P. (contributors to version 1.1) A data transfer agreement template for South Africa, version 1.1. Zenodo 2024. https://doi. org/10.5281/zenodo.11355144