Legal reflections on the doctor-patient relationship in preparation for South Africa’s National Health Insurance

Main Article Content

M Slabbert
M Labuschaigne

Abstract


The doctor-patient relationship is the foundation of any medical intervention. Over time, the relationship has changed, from the era of paternalism to the era of self-determination or patient autonomy, following changes resulting from consumerism and lately, in South Africa, socialised medicine as a result of the proposed National Health Insurance (NHI). The premise of this article is that patient autonomy is invariably limited by a determination of who will carry the cost of a medical intervention. In recent years, legislative developments have affected the understanding of a patient and doctor through the introduction of new references, such as ‘user’, ‘data subject’ and ‘consumer’ for a patient, and ‘service provider’ and ‘responsible party’ for a doctor, each giving different meanings to the doctor-patient relationship. Recent statutory additions also include new remedies available to aggrieved patients as parties in the doctor-patient relationship. The article concludes with brief observations on how the NHI will alter the essence and nature of the doctor-patient relationship in future.

 

Article Details

How to Cite
Legal reflections on the doctor-patient relationship in preparation for South Africa’s National Health Insurance. (2022). South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 15(1), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2022.v15i1.786
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Legal reflections on the doctor-patient relationship in preparation for South Africa’s National Health Insurance. (2022). South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 15(1), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2022.v15i1.786

References

South Africa. National Health Insurance Bill (B11-2019).

Labuschaigne M, Slabbert M. Unpacking the South African National Health Insurance Bill: Potential impact and legal issues. J Contemp Roman-Dutch Law 2020;83(4):471-490.

Webb v Isaac 1915 (EDL) 273.

Dhai A, McQuoid-Mason D. Bioethics, Human Rights and Health Law: Principles and Practice. Cape Town: Juta, 2020.

Siegler M. The three ages of medicine and the doctor-patient relationship. Barcelona: Monographs of the Víctor Grífols i Lucas Foundation, 2011(26):22-23.

Pūras D. Human rights and the practice of medicine. Public Health Rev 2017;38:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-017-0054-7

Rowe K, Moodley K. Patients as consumers of healthcare in South Africa: The ethical and legal implications. BMC Med Ethics 2013;14(1):14-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-15

Le Roux-Kemp A. A legal perspective on the power imbalances in the doctorpatient relationship. LLD thesis. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University, 2010.

Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 6th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Castell v De Greef 1994 (4) SA 408 (C).

Mallardi V. [Le origini del consenso informato] (The origin of informed consent). Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2005;25(5):312-327.

South Africa. National Department of Health. National Health Act No. 61 of 2003. Government Gazette No. 26595 of 23 July 2004.

Soobramoney v Minister of Health (Kwa-Zulu Natal) 1998 (1) SA 765 (CC).

Blaylock R. National Health Insurance: A socialist nightmare. Explorers Foundation, August 2015. https://www.explorersfoundation.org/archive/blaylock-nhi-2009.pdf (accessed 2 September 2021).

Labuschaigne M, Slabbert M. Understanding National Health Insurance in South Africa: A Legal Perspective. Cape Town: Juta, 2020.

South Africa. National Health Amendment Act No. 12 of 2013. Sections 79A-79K.

South Africa. Consumer Protection Act No. 8 of 2008. Government Gazette No. 32186 of 29 April 2009.

Carstens P, Pearmain D. Foundational Principles of South African Medical Law. Durban: LexisNexis, 2007.

Slabbert M, Maister B, Botes M. The application of the Consumer Protection Act in the South African healthcare context: Concerns and recommendations. Comparative Int Law J South Afr 2011;44(2):168-203.

Nöthling-Slabbert M, Pepper MS. Is South Africa on the verge of a medical malpractice litigation storm? S Afr J Bioethics Law 2011;4(1):29-35.

South Africa. Protection of Personal Information Act No. 4 of 2013. Government Gazette No. 37067 of 26 November 2013.

Katurura MC, Cilliers L. Electronic health record system in the public healthcare sector of South Africa: A systematic literature review. Afr J Prim Healthcare Fam Med 2018;10(1):e1-e8. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1746

Pienaar L. Investigating the reasons behind the increase in medical negligence claims. Potchefstroom Elec

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.