Legal reflections on the doctor-patient relationship in preparation for South Africa’s National Health Insurance
Main Article Content
Abstract
The doctor-patient relationship is the foundation of any medical intervention. Over time, the relationship has changed, from the era of paternalism to the era of self-determination or patient autonomy, following changes resulting from consumerism and lately, in South Africa, socialised medicine as a result of the proposed National Health Insurance (NHI). The premise of this article is that patient autonomy is invariably limited by a determination of who will carry the cost of a medical intervention. In recent years, legislative developments have affected the understanding of a patient and doctor through the introduction of new references, such as ‘user’, ‘data subject’ and ‘consumer’ for a patient, and ‘service provider’ and ‘responsible party’ for a doctor, each giving different meanings to the doctor-patient relationship. Recent statutory additions also include new remedies available to aggrieved patients as parties in the doctor-patient relationship. The article concludes with brief observations on how the NHI will alter the essence and nature of the doctor-patient relationship in future.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The SAJBL is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
South Africa. National Health Insurance Bill (B11-2019).
Labuschaigne M, Slabbert M. Unpacking the South African National Health Insurance Bill: Potential impact and legal issues. J Contemp Roman-Dutch Law 2020;83(4):471-490.
Webb v Isaac 1915 (EDL) 273.
Dhai A, McQuoid-Mason D. Bioethics, Human Rights and Health Law: Principles and Practice. Cape Town: Juta, 2020.
Siegler M. The three ages of medicine and the doctor-patient relationship. Barcelona: Monographs of the Víctor Grífols i Lucas Foundation, 2011(26):22-23.
Pūras D. Human rights and the practice of medicine. Public Health Rev 2017;38:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-017-0054-7
Rowe K, Moodley K. Patients as consumers of healthcare in South Africa: The ethical and legal implications. BMC Med Ethics 2013;14(1):14-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-15
Le Roux-Kemp A. A legal perspective on the power imbalances in the doctorpatient relationship. LLD thesis. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University, 2010.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 6th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Castell v De Greef 1994 (4) SA 408 (C).
Mallardi V. [Le origini del consenso informato] (The origin of informed consent). Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2005;25(5):312-327.
South Africa. National Department of Health. National Health Act No. 61 of 2003. Government Gazette No. 26595 of 23 July 2004.
Soobramoney v Minister of Health (Kwa-Zulu Natal) 1998 (1) SA 765 (CC).
Blaylock R. National Health Insurance: A socialist nightmare. Explorers Foundation, August 2015. https://www.explorersfoundation.org/archive/blaylock-nhi-2009.pdf (accessed 2 September 2021).
Labuschaigne M, Slabbert M. Understanding National Health Insurance in South Africa: A Legal Perspective. Cape Town: Juta, 2020.
South Africa. National Health Amendment Act No. 12 of 2013. Sections 79A-79K.
South Africa. Consumer Protection Act No. 8 of 2008. Government Gazette No. 32186 of 29 April 2009.
Carstens P, Pearmain D. Foundational Principles of South African Medical Law. Durban: LexisNexis, 2007.
Slabbert M, Maister B, Botes M. The application of the Consumer Protection Act in the South African healthcare context: Concerns and recommendations. Comparative Int Law J South Afr 2011;44(2):168-203.
Nöthling-Slabbert M, Pepper MS. Is South Africa on the verge of a medical malpractice litigation storm? S Afr J Bioethics Law 2011;4(1):29-35.
South Africa. Protection of Personal Information Act No. 4 of 2013. Government Gazette No. 37067 of 26 November 2013.
Katurura MC, Cilliers L. Electronic health record system in the public healthcare sector of South Africa: A systematic literature review. Afr J Prim Healthcare Fam Med 2018;10(1):e1-e8. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1746
Pienaar L. Investigating the reasons behind the increase in medical negligence claims. Potchefstroom Elec