Limpopo provincial health research committee outcomes: Implications for ethics practice and future research
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Various institutional or organisational ethics research bodies are responsible for approving, safeguarding and monitoring strict adherence to the ethical research conduct of researchers seeking approval and conducting research, which is crucial for rational science, particularly in biomedical and allied health research involving humans. Understanding the profiles and outcomes of research submissions and reviews by ethics research bodies informs research direction and better practice.
Objective. The objective of this study was to evaluate the profile, types of studies, and outcomes of research proposals submitted to the Limpopo Provincial Health Research Committee (LPHRC) of the Department of Health, Limpopo Province, South Africa, from January 2014 to July 2024.
Methods. A retrospective, cross-sectional analytical study of all research proposals submitted to the LPHRC was conducted from January 2014 to July 2024. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics.
Results. Of the 2 066 research proposals submitted to the LPHRC within the review period, the majority were in the years 2020 and 2022, accounting for 17.3% and 13.5%, respectively. About 30.8% were not funded, and 21% were self-funded by the researchers. Few research proposals were funded by organisations (9.7%), the government (4.0%) and companies (1.5%). Notably, 28.7% of the research proposals were rejected for various reasons, probably owing to non-compliance with LPHRC principles. About 46% of the proposals did not specify study designs. Intriguingly, infections (9.3%), mental health (8.9%), respiratory conditions including tuberculosis, and injuries and accidents, were among the least studied research areas in Limpopo Province.
Conclusion. The study identified critical areas needing improvement in research practices, particularly concerning incomplete information on submissions to the LPHREC. Research focusing on national health research priorities, and particularly mental health, warrants attention and stakeholder funding to inform evidence-based practice and interventions.
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The SAJBL is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
1. World Health Organization. Ensuring ethical standards and procedures for research with human beings. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. https:// www.who.int/activities/ensuring-ethical-standards-and-procedures-for- research-with-human-beings
2. Ethical principles for medical research involving human participants: Declaration of Helsinki World Medical Association (WMA), 2024. https://www.wma.net/ policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki/
3. Ashcroft R, Pfeffer N. Ethics behind closed doors: Do research ethics committees need secrecy? BMJ 2001;322(7297):1294-1296.
4. Aksoy N, Aksoy S. Research ethics committees in Turkey. In: Song SY, Koo YM, Macer DRJ, editors. Bioethics in Asia in the 21st century. Christchurch: Eubios Ethics Institute; 2003.
5. KimuraR.Ethicscommitteesfor‘HighTech’innovationsinJapan.JMedPhilosophy 1989;14(4):457-464.
6. CommitteeonBioethics.Institutionalethicscommittees.Pediatrics2001;107(1):205- 209.
7. Tod AM, Nicolson P, Allmark P. Ethical review of health service research in the UK: implications for nursing. J Adv Nurs 2002;40(4):379-386.
8. Kass NE, Hyder AA, Ajuwon A, et al. The structure and function of research ethics committees in Africa: A case study. PLoS Med 2007;4(1):e3.
9. South African Government. National Health Act 61 of 2003 https://www.gov.za/ documents/acts/national-health-act-61-2003-23-jul-2004
10. Makgoba NW, Mametja M, et al. Health research policy in South Africa 2001. https:// www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/healthresearch0.pdf
11. South African ethics in health research guidelines: Principles, processes and structures. 3rd ed. 2024. https://www.health.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ NDoH-2024-Health-Research-Guidelines-3rdEdition-v0.1.pdf
12. IJsselmuiden C, Matlin S. Why health research? Research for health: Policy briefings. Council on Health Research for Development and Global Forum for Health Research. 2006.
13. Department of Higher and Education Training. Highest level of educational attainment in South Africa. www.dhet.gov.za. https://www.dhet.gov.za/Planning%20 Monitoring%20and%20Evaluation%20Coordination/Fact%20Sheet%20-High%20 Level%20Education%20Attainment%20in%20South%20Africa-%20April%20%20 2024.pdf
14. Bradbury J. Promises, pyramids and prisms: Reimagining postgraduate funding. S Afr J Higher Educ 2023;37(6):153-174.
15. National Department of Health. National Health Research Strategy: Research priorities for South Africa 2021-2024. www.gov.za. Pretoria: Department of Health; 2024 (cited 14 February 2025). https://www.health.gov.za/wp-content/ uploads/2021/04/NATIONAL-HEALTH-RESEARCH-STRATEGY-2021-2024.pdf
16. Ngwenya MW, Sumbane GO. The urgency of access to men-centered mental healthcare services to address men’s sensitive issues in the communities of South Africa. Healthcare access - new threats, new approaches. 16 December 2022. IntechOpen.
17. Mitchell M, Kan L. Digital technology and the future of health systems. Health Systems & Reform 2019;5(2):113-120.
18. World Health Organization. Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025. 2021.https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/ gs4dhdaa2a9f352b0445bafbc79ca799dce4d.pdf