Quality of neonatal cranial ultrasound interpretation among paediatric and neonatal trainees in the West Metro of Cape Town: A clinical survey
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Cranial ultrasound (cUS) is a recommended skill for paediatric and neonatal trainees in South Africa, but there are no national or regional guidelines for training.
Objectives. To survey cUS training and knowledge among paediatric and neonatal trainees working in tertiary and regional neonatal units in the West Metro area of Cape Town.
Methods. Trainees who had worked at least 1 month in neonatology on the University of Cape Town training platform were sent an online survey.
Results. Thirty-one paediatric registrars and five neonatal senior registrars were sent the survey. Responses were received from 26 of the 36 trainees (72%). None had attended a formal cUS course, 18 (69%) had attended a lecture from a neonatologist, and 8 (30%) had attended a formal consultant tutorial. Ten (38%) trainees received initial training from registrars, medical officers, or self-study. Most trainees stated the cUS report should describe anatomy (92%), haemorrhage (81%) and ventricular size (65%). Knowledge of other reporting and procedural aspects varied from 4% to 50%. Correct identification of the major features of images ranged from 12% to 92% but was below 40% in most questions. Trainees with ≥24 months experience were more likely to correctly identify a normal scan (58% v. 14%; p=0.038) and less likely to assign abnormal prognosis (0% v. 43%; p=0.017).
Conclusions. There was inadequate and variable cUS training and competency in paediatric and neonatal trainees in our institution. A national standardised programme for training and accreditation of clinician-performed neonatal cUS will address this.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The SAJCH is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
1. Dudink J, Steggerda SJ, Horsch S, eurUS.brain group. State-of-the-art neonatal cerebral ultrasound: Technique and reporting. Pediatr Res 2020;87(suppl 1):3- 12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0776-y
2. Caro-Domínguez P, Lecacheux C, Hernandez-Herrera C, Llorens-Salvador R. Cranial ultrasound for beginners. Transl Pediatr 2021;10(4):1117–1137. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-20-399
3. Mohammad K, Scott JN, Leijser LM, et al. Consensus approach for standardizing the screening and classification of preterm brain injury diagnosed with cranial ultrasound: A Canadian perspective. Front Pediatr 2021;9:618236. https://doi. org/10.3389/fped.2021.618236
4. Beltempo M, Wintermark P, Lemyre B, et al. Predictors of severe neurologic injury on ultrasound scan of the head and risk factor-based screening for infants born preterm. J Pediatr 2019;214:27-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jpeds.2019.06.065
5. Van Wezel-Meijler G, Steggerda SJ, Leijser LM. Cranial ultrasonography in neonates: Role and limitations. Semin Perinatol 2010;34(1):28-38. https://doi. org/10.1053/j.semperi.2009.10.002
6. Steggerda SJ, Leijser LM, Walther FJ, van Wezel-Meijler G. Neonatal cranial ultrasonography: How to optimise its performance. Early Hum Dev 2009;85(2):93-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.11.008
7. Colleges of Medicine of South Africa (CMSA). FC Paed (SA) Portfolio and Cert (Neon) Portfolio. https://www.cmsa.co.za/view_exam.aspx?QualificationID=20 (accessed 5 January 2023).
8. The Royal Australasian College of Physicians, Neonatal/Perinatal Medicine Advanced Training Curriculum Paediatrics & Child Health Division 2010 (revised 2013). https://www.racp.edu.au/docs/default- source/trainees/ advanced-training/neonatal-and-perinatal-medicine/neonatal-perinatal-
9. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Neonatal Medicine Syllabus, Level 3, Paediatrics Subspecialty Syllabus 2018. https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/ education-careers/training/progress/curriculum (accessed 1 December 2023).
10. The Society of Radiographers. Guidelines for Professional Ultrasound Practice: 7th ed. 2022. https://www.sor.org/news/ultrasound/guidelines-for- professional-ultrasound-practice-7t (accessed 1 December 2023).
11. Reynolds PR, Dale RC, Cowan FM. Neonatal cranial ultrasound interpretation: A clinical audit. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;84(2):92-95. https:// doi.org/10.1136/fn.84.2.f92
12. Davis PJC, Cox RM, Brooks J. Training in neonatal cranial ultrasound: A questionnaire survey. Br J Radiol 2005;78(925):55-56. https://doi. org/10.1259/bjr/63858589
13. Banerjee J, Bhojani S, Khan A. Training and competency in neonatal cranial ultrasonography – a regional online questionnaire survey. Infant 2010;6(6):202-205.
14. Lalzad A, Wong F, Singh N, et al. Knowledge of safety, training, and practice of neonatal cranial ultrasound: A survey of operators. J Ultrasound Med 2018;37(6):1411-1421. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14481
15. Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (ASUM). Certificate in Clinician Performed Ultrasound (CCPU) Neonatal 2022. https://www.asum. com.au/education/ccpu-course/ccpu-neonatal/ (accessed 1 December 2023).
16. Hand IL, Shellhaas RA, Milla SS, et al. Routine neuroimaging of the preterm brain. Pediatrics 2020;146(5):e2020029082. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020- 029082
17. AIUM practice parameter for the performance of neurosonography in neonates and infants. J Ultrasound Med 2020;39(5):57-61. https://doi. org/10.1002/jum.15264
18. Mutshutshu NP. Determination of the adequacy of cranial ultrasound requests and reports at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital (dissertation). MMed Diagnostic Radiology, University of the Witwatersrand, 2016.
19. Mutshutshu NP, Hlabangana LT. Are cranial ultrasound requests and reports adequate at two academic hospitals in Johannesburg? S Afr J Rad 2017;21(1):1182. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v21i1.1182
20. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013;310(20):2191-2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
21. Pillay S, ed. Neonatal Guidelines and Drug Doses 2022. 6th ed. Cape Town: Cape Town Neonatal Consultancy, 2021.
22. Ben Fadel N, Pulgar L, Khurshid F. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in Canadian neonatal intensive care units (NICUs): Where are we? J Ultrasound 2019;22(2):201-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-019-00383-4
23. Royal College of Radiologists. Ultrasound training recommendations for medical and surgical specialties 2022. https://www.bmus.org/static/uploads/resources/ bfcr173_ultrasound_training_med_surg.pdf (accessed 1 December 2023).
24. European Standards of Care for Newborn Health. Neurological monitoring in the high-risk infant: Ultrasound and MRI scanning 2021. https://newborn- health-standards.org/downloads/ (accessed 1 December 2023).
25. Calgary Neonatal Neuro-Critical Care. https://nncceducation.thinkific.com/ (accessed 1 December 2023).