Predictive scores for critically ill obstetric patients in a resource‐limited setting: A retrospective validation of the Obstetric Early Warning Score.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. In South Africa (SA), an unacceptably high institutional maternal mortality rate persists due to failure to recognise critically ill patients. Early warning systems could assist in identifying these patients sooner.
Objectives. We evaluated the Obstetric Early Warning Score (OEWS) as a predictor of maternal outcomes in an intensive care unit (ICU) and compared its prognostic validity with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (qSOFA).
Methods. Data were extracted on pregnant and post-partum ICU-admitted patients at a tertiary and regional centre in SA between October 2015 and April 2020. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were used to compare the three scoring systems.
Results. Among 251 eligible patients, the mortality rate was 8.5%. The OEWS score failed to differentiate between survivors and non-survivors (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.972 - 1.311, p=0.113). APACHE II outperformed the OEWS (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) 0.69, 95% CI 0.540 - 0.846 v. 0.55, 95% CI 0.430 - 0.674). The OEWS (AUROC 0.55, 95% CI 0.430 - 0.674) and qSOFA (AUROC 0.60, 95% CI 0.500 - 0.703) showed no differences. Further analysis revealed that positive scoring for diastolic blood pressure and high systolic blood pressure weakened OEWS performance. Removing these variables improved OEWS prediction (AUROC 0.68).
Conclusion. In a SA obstetric population, OEWS did not predict mortality in ICU-admitted patients and offered no advantages over APACHE II or qSOFA scores. Further research should identify critical outcome predictors for low-resource populations.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The SAJOG is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
Moodley J, Fawcus S, Pattinson R. 21 years of confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in South Africa: reflections on maternal death assessments. Obstet Gynaecol Forum 2020;30(4):4-7. https:// hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-medog-v30-n4-a2
Saving Mothers 2017: Annual Report on Confidential Inquiries into Maternal Death in South Africa. 2018. https://www.westerncape.gov.za/assets/departments/health/saving_mothers_annual_ report_2017.pdf
Oliveira-Neto AF, Parpinelli MA, Costa ML, et al.. Prediction of severe maternal outcome among pregnant and puerperal women in obstetric ICU. Crit Care Med 2019;47(2):e136-e43.
Paternina-Caicedo A, Miranda J, Bourjeily G, et al.. Performance of the Obstetric Early Warning Score in critically ill patients for the prediction of maternal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216(1):58. e1-e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.103
Rojas-Suarez J, Paternina-Caicedo AJ, Miranda J, Mendoza R, Dueñas-Castel C, Bourjeily G. Comparison of severity-of-illness scores in critically ill obstetric patients: A 6-year retrospective cohort*. Crit Care Med 2014;42(5):1047-54.
Vasco M, Pandya S, Van Dyk D, Bishop DG, Wise R, Dyer RA. Maternal critical care in resource- limited settings. Narrative review. Int J Obstet Anesthesia 2019;37:86-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijoa.2018.09.010
Carle C, Alexander P, Columb M, Johal J. Design and internal validation of an obstetric early warning score: Secondary analysis of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Case Mix Programme database. Anaesthesia 2013;68(4):354-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12180
Lewis G. The confidential enquiry into maternal and child health (CEMACH). Saving mothers’ lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer 2003-2005. The seventh report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH; 2007.
Allorto NL, Wise RD. Development and evaluation of an integrated electronic data management system in a South African metropolitan critical care service. S Afr J Anaesth Analg 2015;21:31-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22201181.2015.11
Khergade M, Suri J, Bharti R, Pandey D, Bachani S, Mittal P. Obstetric Early Warning Score for prognostication of critically ill obstetric patient. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(6):398-403.
Lafon J, Buga E, Nethathe G. Characteristics and outcomes of obstetric patients with maternal sepsis requiring admission to a South African intensive care unit: A retrospective review. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol 2021;26(3). https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-m_sajog-v26-n3-a2
Stafford RE, Morrison CA, Godfrey G, Mahalu W. Challenges to the provision of emergency services and critical care in resource-constrained settings. Glob Heart 2014;9(3):319-323. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.gheart.2014.08.005
Umar A, Manu A, Mathai M, Ameh C. Development and validation of an obstetric early warning system model for use in low resource settings. BMC Pregnancy Childb 2020;20(1):531. https://doi. org/10.1186/s12884-020-03215-0
Aoyama K, D’Souza R, Pinto R, et al.. Risk prediction models for maternal mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 2018;13(12):e0208563. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0208563