Prescribed Minimum Benefits complaints: a five-year retrospective review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i16b.1007Keywords:
Medical Schemes, Prescribed Minimum Benefits, ComplaintsAbstract
Background: No matter which benefit option members have chosen, medical schemes are required by the Medical Schemes Act no. 131 of 1998 to pay costs associated with the diagnosis, treatment, or care of a specified set of benefits known as Prescribed Minimum Benefits (PMBs). Medical scheme beneficiaries have the right to lodge complaints with the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) when their claims are denied.
Objective: To determine and describe the pattern of PMBs complaints received by CMS from January 2014 to December 2018.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that utilised the CMS’ clinical complaints. Data for PMBs, complainants, medical scheme types, and reasons for payment denial were extracted. The CMS’ lists of chronic conditions, PMBs, and registered schemes were used to confirm PMBs and to categorise schemes as either restricted (i.e., to only members of specific organisations) or open (i.e., to all South Africans). Extracted and coded data were analysed using SAS v.9.4 software.
Results: A total of 2141 complaints were retrieved and 1124 PMBs complaints were included in the study. The median of PMBs complaints per year was 225. Most of the complaints (43.6%, n=490/1124) were lodged by members themselves. Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) constituted most of the PMBs conditions that members complained about. Medicine and surgery were the services that were mostly denied full payment by medical schemes. Open medical schemes accounted for more (73.8%, n=830/1124) of the complaints.
Conclusion: Chronic conditions are the main diseases that medical scheme members complained about. Member education and clear definition of PMBs should be prioritised by medical schemes and the Council for Medical Schemes.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lindelwa Mitchele Ngobeni, Lucky Moropeng, Dr. Evelyn Thsehla
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing Information
The SAMJ is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
Publishing Rights
Authors grant the Publisher the exclusive right to publish, display, reproduce and/or distribute the Work in print and electronic format and in any medium known or hereafter developed, including for commercial use. The Author also agrees that the Publisher may retain in print or electronic format more than one copy of the Work for the purpose of preservation, security and back-up.
