The development of a nurse-led preoperative anaesthesia screening tool by Delphi consensus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i2.1306Keywords:
anaesthesia, high-risk patients, pre-operative, screening toolAbstract
Background. Low- and middle-income countries have a critical shortage of specialist anaesthetists. Most patients arriving for surgery are of low perioperative risk. Without immediate access to preoperative specialist care, an appropriate interim strategy may be to ensure that only high-risk patients are seen preoperatively by a specialist. Matching human resources to the burden of disease with a nurse-administered pre-operative screening tool to identify high-risk patients who might benefit from specialist review prior to the day of surgery may be an effective strategy.
Objective. To develop a nurse-administered preoperative anaesthesia screening tool to identify patients who would most likely benefit from a specialist review before the day of surgery, and those patients who could safely be seen by the anaesthetist on the day of surgery. This would ensure adequate time for optimisation of high-risk patients preoperatively and limit avoidable day-of-surgery cancellations.
Methods. A systematic review was conducted to identify preoperative screening questions for use in a three-round Delphi consensus process. A panel of 16 experienced full-time clinical anaesthetists representing all university-affiliated anaesthesia departments in South Africa participated to define a nurses’ screening tool for preoperative assessment.
Results. Ninety-eight studies were identified, which generated 79 questions. An additional 14 items identified by the facilitators were added to create a list of 93 questions for the first round. The final screening tool consisted of 81 questions, of which 37 were deemed critical to identify patients who should be seen by a specialist prior to the day of surgery.
Conclusion. A structured nurse-administered preoperative screening tool is proposed to identify high-risk patients who are likely to benefit from a timely preoperative specialist anaesthetist review to avoid cancellation on the day of surgery.
References
Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet 2015;386(9993):569-624. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60160-X
Kempthorne P, Morriss WW, Mellin-Olsen J, Gore-Booth J. The WFSA Global Anesthesia Workforce Survey. Anesth Analg 2017;125(3):981-990. https://doi.org/10.1213/ ane.0000000000002258
BiccardBM,MadibaTE,KluytsHL,etal.PerioperativepatientoutcomesintheAfricanSurgical Outcomes Study: A 7-day prospective observational cohort study. Lancet 2018;391(10130):1589- 1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30001-1
Junger S, Payne SA, Brine J, Radbruch L, Brearley SG. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med 2017;31(8):684-706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317690685
Arun N, Al-Jaham KMA, Alhebail SA, et al. Nurse-run preanaesthesia assessment clinics: An initiative towards improving the quality of perioperative care at the ambulatory care centre. BMJ Open Qual 2021;10:e001066. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001066
Nicholson A, Coldwell CH, Lewis SR, Smith AF. Nurse-led versus doctor-led pre-operative assessment for elective surgical patients requiring regional or general anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013(11):Cd010160. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd010160.pub2
Winkler J, Moser R. Biases in future-orientated Delphi studies: A cognitive perspective. Technol Forecasting Soc Change 2016;105:63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.021
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 M B Nejthardt, P Alexandris, S Bechan, M F A Bijli, S Chetty, J M Dippenaar, M Gibbs, M Johnson, H Kluyts, R Llewellyn, M Motiang, P Mogane, P Motshabi, B Mrara, F Roodt, U Singh, S Spijkerman, E Turton, J van der Westhuizen, B Biccard
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing Information
The SAMJ is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
Publishing Rights
Authors grant the Publisher the exclusive right to publish, display, reproduce and/or distribute the Work in print and electronic format and in any medium known or hereafter developed, including for commercial use. The Author also agrees that the Publisher may retain in print or electronic format more than one copy of the Work for the purpose of preservation, security and back-up.
