Two decades of recipient and donor referrals for heart transplantation to Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa: A retrospective study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i3b.1371Keywords:
heart failure, heart transplantAbstract
Background. Heart transplantation in South Africa faces numerous challenges related to organ scarcity and unequal access to advanced heart therapy. There is an urgent need to analyse the current transplant referral pathway to optimise equitable access to transplantation.
Objectives. To provide an audit of heart transplant referrals to Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, over a 23-year period, focusing on patient demographics, indications for referral, waiting-list dynamics, and transplant referral outcomes.
Methods. The study utilised a retrospective patient folder review for the period 1 January 1997 - 31 December 2019 and audited the trends in heart transplant referrals and associated outcomes of the referral at a tertiary academic hospital.
Results. A total of 625 recipients were referred for heart transplantation, with the majority being male (n=412; 65.9%), while gender was undocumented for 69 cases (11.0%). The mean age was 38.1 (14.6) years, and 153 (24.5%) were listed for transplant, while 215 (34.4%) were deemed ineligible for listing. Contraindications for listing included social (n=106; 49.3%), medical (n=83; 38.6%) and psychological (n=26; 12.0%) factors, while 134 patients (21.4%) were considered too well. Poor social circumstances (n=38; 39.6%), poor insight (n=28; 29.2%) and poor compliance (n=21; 21.9%) were the most common non-medical reasons for not listing recipients, while obesity (n=30; 31.3%) and smoking (n=23; 24.0%) were notable medical contraindications. Forty-nine patients (7.8%) died during work-up, while 130 (85.0%) of the listed patients received a heart transplant. Of the 429 donor referrals, 139 (32.4%) were accepted for organ procurement. Reasons for declining donors included unsuitability for transplantation (30.3%), lack of capacity (1.8%), and recipient-donor mismatch (66.9%).
Conclusion. Three-quarters of the referred patients were deemed unsuitable for heart transplantation for medical and/or social reasons. The ratio of referral to listing has decreased over time. However, once listed, the likelihood of receiving a transplant was high.
References
Kittleson MM, Kobashigawa JA. Cardiac transplantation: Current outcomes and contemporary controversies. JACC Heart Fail 2017;5(12):857-868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2017.08.021
Mancini D, Lietz K. Selection of cardiac transplantation candidates in 2010. Circulation 2010;122(2):173-183.
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.858076
DePasquale EC, Kobashigawa JA. Socioeconomic disparities in heart transplantation: A universal fix? Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2016;9(6):693-694. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003210
Evans JDW, Kaptoge S, Caleyachetty R, et al. Socioeconomic deprivation and survival after heart transplantation in England: An analysis of the United Kingdom Transplant Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2016;9(6):695-703. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002652
Barnard CN. The operation. A human cardiac transplant: An interim report of a successful operation performed at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town. S Afr Med J 1967;41(48):1271-1274.
Niewijk A. Tough priorities: Organ triage and the legacy of apartheid. Hastings Cent Rep 1999;29(6):42-50.
Statistics South Africa. General household survey 2021. Statistical release P0318. Pretoria: Stats SA, 2021.
https://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0318/P03182021.pdf (accessed 5 July 2023).
Maldonado JR. Why it is important to consider social support when assessing organ transplant candidates?
Am J Bioeth 2019;19(11):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1671689
Du Toit T, Manning K, Thomson D, McCurdie F, Muller E. A 10-year analysis of organ donor referrals to
a South African tertiary public sector hospital. S Afr Med J 2020;110(2):132-134. https://doi.org/10.7196/
SAMJ.2020.v110i2.14125
Prins L, Human L. Early identification and referral of organ donors in five private hospitals: A survey to determine the knowledge and views of critical care professional nurses pre and post a PowerPoint training intervention. South Afr J Crit Care 2019;35(2). https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i2.370
Brink J, Pennel T, Seele K, Zilla P. The world’s first human-to-human heart transplant at Groote Schuur Hospital: 50 years later. S Afr Med J 2017;107(12):1035-1036. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2017. v107i12.12960
Velleca A, Shullo MA, Dhital K, et al. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2023;42(5):e1-e141. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.015
Bakhtiyar SS, Godfrey EL, Ahmed S, et al. Survival on the heart transplant waiting list. JAMA Cardiol 2020;5(11):1227-1235. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2795
Berry KN, Daniels N, Ladin K. Should lack of social support prevent access to organ transplantation? Am J Bioeth 2019;19(11):13-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1665728
Flattau A, Olaywi M, Gaglio PJ, et al. Social barriers to listing for adult liver transplantation: Their prevalence and association with program characteristics. Liver Transpl 2011;17(10):1167-1175. https://doi.org/10.1002/ lt.22357
Patzer RE, Perryman JP, Schrager JD, et al. The role of race and poverty on steps to kidney transplantation in the Southeastern United States. Am J Transplant 2012;12(2):358-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600- 6143.2011.03927.x
Ladin K, Emerson J, Berry K, et al. Excluding patients from transplant due to social support: Results from a national survey of transplant providers. Am J Transplant 2019;19(1):193-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/ ajt.14962
DeFilippis EM, Clerkin KJ, Givens RC, et al. Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on evaluation for heart transplantation at an urban academic medical center. Clin Transplant 2022;36(6):e14652. https://doi. org/10.1111/ctr.14652
Chapman EN, Kaatz A, Carnes M. Physicians and implicit bias: How doctors may unwittingly perpetuate health care disparities. J Gen Intern Med 2013;28(11):1504-1510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2441-1
Wayda B, Clemons A, Givens RC, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in adherence and outcomes after heart transplant: A UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) registry analysis. Circ Heart Fail 2018;11(3):e004173.
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004173
Ladin K, Daniels A, Osani M, Bannuru RR. Is social support associated with post-transplant medication adherence and outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2018;32(1):16- 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2017.04.001
Dharmavaram N, Hess T, Jaeger H, et al. National trends in heart donor usage rates: Are we efficiently transplanting more hearts? J Am Heart Assoc 2021;10(15):e019655. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019655
Copeland H, Knezevic I, Baran DA, et al. Donor heart selection: Evidence-based guidelines for providers. J Heart Lung Transplant 2023;42(1):7-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2022.08.030
Akintoye E, Alvarez P, Shin D, et al. Changing demographics, temporal trends in waitlist,
and posttransplant outcomes after heart transplantation in the United States: Analysis of the UNOS database 1991 - 2019. Circ Heart Fail 2021;14(11):e008764. https://doi.org/10.1161/ CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.008764
Naidoo D. Traumatic brain injury: The South African landscape. S Afr Med J 2013;103(9):613-614.
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.7325
Khush KK, Potena L, Cherikh WS, et al. The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: 37th adult heart transplantation report – 2020: Focus on deceased donor characteristics. J Heart Lung Transplant 2020;39(10):1003-1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2020.07.010
Wood DM, Dargan PI, Jones AL. Poisoned patients as potential organ donors: Postal survey of transplant centres and intensive care units. Crit Care 2003;7(2):147-154. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1880
Kramer AH, Baht R, Doig CJ. Time trends in organ donation after neurologic determination of death: A cohort study. CMAJ Open 2017;5(1):E19-E27. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20160093
Fishman JA, Greenwald MA, Kuehnert MJ. Enhancing transplant safety: A new era in the microbiologic evaluation of organ donors? Am J Transplant 2007;7(12):2652-2654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600- 6143.2007.02023.x
Greenhall GHB, Rous BA, Robb ML, et al. Organ transplants from deceased donors with primary brain tumors and risk of cancer transmission. JAMA Surg 2023;158(5):504-513. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jamasurg.2022.8419
Kubak BM, Gregson AL, Pegues DA, et al. Use of hearts transplanted from donors with severe sepsis and infectious deaths. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009;28(3):260-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. healun.2008.11.911
Mikami T, Itagaki S, Fujisaki T, et al. Association of donor brain death due to stroke with prognosis after heart transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;79(11):1063-1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jacc.2021.12.031
Singhal AK, Sheng X, Drakos SG, Stehlik J. Impact of donor cause of death on transplant outcomes: UNOS registry analysis. Transplant Proc 2009;41(9):3539-3544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. transproceed.2009.06.192
Yamani MH, Lauer MS, Starling RC, et al. Impact of donor spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage on outcome after heart transplantation. Am J Transplant 2004;4(2):257-261. https://doi.org/10.1046/ j.1600-6143.2003.00314.x
Dew MA, DiMartini AF, Dobbels F, et al. The 2018 ISHLT/APM/AST/ICCAC/STSW recommendations for the psychosocial evaluation of adult cardiothoracic transplant candidates and candidates for long-term mechanical circulatory support. J Heart Lung Transplant 2018;37(7):803-823. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.healun.2018.03.005
Maldonado JR, Dubois HC, David EE, et al. The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT): A new tool for the psychosocial evaluation of pre-transplant candidates. Psychosomatics 2012;53(2):123-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psym.2011.12.012
Maldonado JR, Sher Y, Lolak S, et al. The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation: A prospective study of medical and psychosocial outcomes. Psychosom Med 2015;77(9):1018-1030. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000241
Bui QM, Allen LA, LeMond L, Brambatti M, Adler E. Psychosocial evaluation of candidates for heart transplant and ventricular assist devices: Beyond the current consensus. Circ Heart Fail 2019;12(7):e006058. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006058
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 R Kanyongo, G Calligaro, B Cupido, J Scherman, A Brooks, C Ofoegbu, N Da Silva, A Ryan, M Mofamadi, K Seele, P Human, J Brink, P Zilla, T Pennel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing Information
The SAMJ is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
Publishing Rights
Authors grant the Publisher the exclusive right to publish, display, reproduce and/or distribute the Work in print and electronic format and in any medium known or hereafter developed, including for commercial use. The Author also agrees that the Publisher may retain in print or electronic format more than one copy of the Work for the purpose of preservation, security and back-up.
