Artificial intelligence (AI) or augmented intelligence? How big data and AI are transforming healthcare: Challenges and opportunities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i1.1631Keywords:
AIAbstract
The sanctity of the doctor-patient relationship is deeply embedded in tradition – the Hippocratic oath, medical ethics, professional codes of conduct, and legislation – all of which are being disrupted by big data and ‘artificial’ intelligence (AI). The transition from paper-based records to electronic health records, wearables, mobile health applications and mobile phone data has created new opportunities to scale up data collection. Databases of unimaginable magnitude can be harnessed to develop algorithms for AI and to refine machine learning. Complex neural networks now lie at the core of ubiquitous AI systems in healthcare. A transformed healthcare environment enhanced by innovation, robotics, digital technology, and improved diagnostics and therapeutics is plagued by ethical, legal and social challenges. Global guidelines are emerging to ensure governance in AI, but many low- and middle-income countries have yet to develop context- specific frameworks. Legislation must be developed to frame liability and account for negligence due to robotics in the same way human healthcare providers are held accountable. The digital divide between high- and low-income settings is significant and has the potential to exacerbate health inequities globally.
References
Moodley K. Rennie S. ChatGPT has many uses: Experts explore what this means for healthcare and medical research. The Conversation, 22 February 2023. https://theconversation.com/chatgpt-has- many-uses-experts-explore-what-this-means-for-healthcare-and-medical-research-200283 (accessed 12 October 2023).
Bean WB. Sir William Osler: Aphorisms from his bedside teachings and writings. Br J Philos Sci 1954;5(18):172-173. https://philpapers.org/rec/BEASWO (accessed 17 October 2023).
Roguin A. Rene Theophile Hyacinthe Laënnec (1781 - 1826): The man behind the stethoscope. Clin Med Res 2006;4(3):230-235. https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.4.3.230
Peck P. Dr Cammann and the binaural stethoscope. J Kans Med Soc 1963;64:121-123.
Ghanayim T, Lupu L, Naveh S, et al. Artificial intelligence-based stethoscope for the diagnosis of aortic stenosis. Am J Med 2022;135(9):1124-1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.04.032
Zhang M, Li M, Guo L, Liu J. A low-cost AI-empowered stethoscope and a lightweight model for detecting cardiac and respiratory diseases from lung and heart auscultation sounds. Sensors (Basel) 2023;23(5):2591. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052591
Turing AM. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 1950;236:433-460. https://phil415.pbworks.com/f/TuringComputing.pdf (accessed 17 September 2023).
Mintz Y, Brodie R. Introduction to artificial intelligence in medicine. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2019;28(2):73-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2019.1575882
Morgan AA, Abdi J, Syed MAQ, Kohen GE, Barlow P, Vizcaychipi MP. Robots in healthcare: A scoping review. Curr Robot Rep 2022;3(4):271-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-022-00095-4
Ohneberg C, Stöbich N, Warmbein A, et al. Assistive robotic systems in nursing care: A scoping review. BMC Nurs 2023;22(1):72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01230-y
Sarker S, Jamal L, Ahmed SF, Irtisam N. Robotics and artificial intelligence in healthcare during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Rob Auton Syst 2021;146:103902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2021.103902
Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa R, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 2017;542(7639):115-118. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21056
Lång K, Josefsson V, Larsson AM, et al. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): A clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study. Lancet Oncol 2023;24(8):936-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00298-X
Singhal K, Azizi S, Tu T, et al. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature 2023;620(7972):172-180. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2
Dave T, Athaluri SA, Singh S. ChatGPT in medicine: An overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations. Front Artif Intell 2023;6:1169595. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1169595
Topol ER. As artificial intelligence goes multimodal, medical applications multiply. Science 2023;381(6663):eadk6139. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adk6139
Petrozzino C. Who pays for ethical debt in AI? AI Ethics 2021;1:205-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00030-3
Ristevski B, Chen M. Big data analytics in medicine and healthcare. J Integr Bioinform 2018;15(3):20170030. https://doi.org/10.1515/jib-2017-0030
Azamfirei R, Kudchadkar SR, Fackler J. Large language models and the perils of their hallucinations.
Crit Care 2023;27(1):120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04393-x
Abràmoff, MD, Tarver ME, Loyo-Berrios N, et al. Considerations for addressing bias in artificial intelligence for health equity. NPJ Digit Med 2023;6(1):170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00913-9
Gudis DA, McCoul ED, Marino MJ, Patel ZM. Avoiding bias in artificial intelligence. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023;13(3):193-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23129
Liu KA, Mager NA. Women’s involvement in clinical trials: Historical perspective and future implications.
Pharm Pract (Granada) 2016;14(1):708. https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2016.01.708
Kampmann B. Women and children last? Shaking up exclusion criteria for vaccine trials. Nat Med
;27(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-01199-0
Muralidharan V, Burgart A, Daneshjou R, Rose S. Recommendations for the use of paediatric data in artificial intelligence and machine learning ACCEPT-AI. NPJ Digit Med 2023;6(1):166. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00898-5
Larson E. Exclusion of certain groups from clinical research. Image J Nurs Sch 1994;26(3):185-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00311.x
Tobin MJ, Jubran A. Pulse oximetry, racial bias and statistical bias. Ann Intensive Care 2022;12:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00974-7
Singh AK, Sahi MS, Mahawar B, Rajpurohit S. Comparative evaluation of accuracy of pulse oximeters and factors affecting their performance in a tertiary intensive care unit. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11(6):OC05-OC08. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/24640.9961
Goddard K, Roudsari A, Wyatt JC. Automation bias – a hidden issue for clinical decision support system use. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011;164:17-22.
Cengiz N, Obasa EA, Ganya W, Moodley K. Digital technologies and artificial intelligence in healthcare: Ethical challenges. In: Moodley K, ed. Bioethics, Medical Law and Human Rights: A South African Perspective. 3rd ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers, 2023:283-291.
Alami H, Rivard L, Lehoux P, et al. Artificial intelligence in health care: Laying the foundation for responsible, sustainable, and inclusive innovation in low- and middle-income countries. Glob Health 2020;16(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00584-1
De Silva D, Alahakoon D. An artificial intelligence life cycle: From conception to production. Patterns (N Y) 2022;3(6):100489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100489
Na L, Yang C, Lo CC, Zhao F, Fukuoka Y, Aswani A. Feasibility of reidentifying individuals in large national physical activity data sets from which protected health information has been removed with use of machine learning. JAMA Netw Open 2018;1(8):e186040. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jamanetworkopen.2018.6040
Deshpande A, Rajpurohit T, Narasimham K, Kaljan A. Anthropomorphisation of AI: Opportunities and risks. arXiv 2023;2305:14784. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.14784
Moodley K, Sibanda N, February K, Rossouw T. ‘It’s my blood’: Ethical complexities in the use, storage and export of biological samples: Perspectives from South African research participants. BMC Med Ethics 2014;15:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-4
Moodley K. Kleinsmidt A. Allegations of misuse of African DNA in the UK: Will data protection legislation in South Africa be sufficient to prevent a recurrence? Dev World Bioeth 2021;21(3):125- 130. https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12277
Ligozat A-L, Lefevre J, Bugeau A, Combaz J. Unraveling the hidden environmental impacts of AI solutions for environment life cycle assessment of AI solutions. Sustainability 2022;14(9):5172. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su14095172
World Health Organization. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. 28 June 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200 (accessed 10 September 2023).
Hedderich DM, Weisstanner C, van Cauter S, et al. Artificial intelligence tools in clinical neuroradiology: Essential medico-legal aspects. Neuroradiology 2023;65(7):1091-1099. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s00234-023-03152-7
London AJ. Artificial intelligence and black-box medical decisions: Accuracy versus explainability.
Hastings Cent Rep 2019;49(1):15-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.973
The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Making automated systems work for the American people. 2022. https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of- rights (accessed 17 October 2023).
Le Ludec C, Cornet M. How low-paid workers in Madagascar power French tech’s AI ambitions. The Conversation, 30 March 2023. https://theconversation.com/how-low-paid-workers-in-madagascar- power-french-techs-ai-ambitions-202421 (accessed 10 September 2023).
Blumenthal-Barby J. An AI Bill of Rights: Implications for health care AI and machine learning – a bioethics lens. Am J Bioeth 2023;23(1):4-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2135875
Health Professions Council of South Africa. Guidelines for good practice in the health professions: General ethical guidelines for the healthcare professions. Booklet 1. Pretoria: HPCSA, 2021. https:// www.hpcsa.co.za/Uploads/professional_practice/ethics/Booklet_1_Guidelines_for_Good_Practice_ vDec_2021.pdf (accessed 18 October 2023).
Hacker P. The European AI liability directives – critique of a half-hearted approach and lessons for the future. Comput Law Secur Rev 2023;51:105871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105871
Brand D. Responsible artificial intelligence in government: Development of a legal framework for South Africa. JeDEM – EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government 2022;14(1):130-150. https:// doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v14i1.678
South Africa. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa No. 108 of 1996. https://www.gov.za/sites/ default/files/images/a108-96.pdf (accessed 30 September 2023).
South Africa. Department of Trade and Industry: Consumer Protection Act No. 68 of 2008. https:// www.gov.za/sites/default/files/32186_467.pdf (accessed 15 October 2023).
South Africa. Protection of Personal Information Act No. 4 of 2013. https://www.gov.za/documents/ protection-personal-information-act (accessed 16 October 2023).
Solaiman B. Telehealth in the metaverse: Legal & ethical challenges for cross-border care in virtual worlds. J Law Med Ethics 2023;51(2):287-300. https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.64
Acosta JN, Falcone GJ, Rajpurkar P, et al. Multimodal biomedical AI. Nat Med 2022;28(9):1773-1784. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01981-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 K Moodley
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing Information
The SAMJ is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
Publishing Rights
Authors grant the Publisher the exclusive right to publish, display, reproduce and/or distribute the Work in print and electronic format and in any medium known or hereafter developed, including for commercial use. The Author also agrees that the Publisher may retain in print or electronic format more than one copy of the Work for the purpose of preservation, security and back-up.
