Saying sorry – should a ‘safe space’ be created to allow effective communication between healthcare practitioners and aggrieved parties after an iatrogenic event in South Africa?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i8.1881Keywords:
Apology Laws - medical negligence - settlementAbstract
The incidence of medical negligence claims is well documented in South Africa (SA). Civil and criminal processes are in place to deal with this, and the matter may be reported to the Health Professions Council of SA (HPCSA). There is a school of thought that suggests that these processes do not provide sufficient relief to an affected party. The processes are not always satisfactory; an aggrieved party may wish to know the reasons why a particular error occurred and why a healthcare practitioner acted in a particular manner. In addition to this, they may want to receive a sincere apology. Medical practitioners may also want to communicate with patients or family members of a patient who has passed away as a result of an iatrogenic event, but may be fearful of litigation. This article considers the current position in SA in relation to issuing an apology related to an iatrogenic event, and consults foreign jurisdictions for further guidance on the topic.
References
Prinsen L. The leading causes of medicolegal claims and possible solutions. S Afr Med J
;113(4):1140 -1142. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2023.v113i4.134
South African Law Reform Discussion Paper. Discussion Paper 154 Project 141 Medico-Legal Claims.
https://www.saflii.org/za/other/ZALRC/2022/9.pdf (accessed 29 February 2024).
Tumelty M. Medical negligence litigation and apologies: An empirical examination Euro J Health Law
;27(4):386-403. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-BJA10021
McLennan S, Rich LE, Truog RD. Apologies in medicine: Legal protection is not enough, CMAJ
;187(5):156-158. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.131860
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996. https://www.gov.za/documents/constitution/
constitution-republic-south-africa-1996-1 (accessed 14 January 2024).
Zeffert DT, Paizes AP. The Law of Evidence. 3rd ed. LexisNexis: Cape Town, 2017.
R v Mpanza 1915 AD 348.
Supreme Court of South Africa. Uniform rules – rules regulating the conduct of proceedings of the
several provincial and local divisions of the High Court of South Africa. Rule 34. https://www.saflii.
org/images/superiorcourts/Uniform%20Rules%20of%20Court%20[F].pdf (accessed 17 January 2024).
Government of South Africa. Rules regulating the conduct of proceedings in the Magistrates’ Court
of South Africa. Rule 18. https://www.saflii.org/images/magistratescourts/MCR%20[R].pdf (accessed
January 2024).
Bulver A. Should doctors be allowed to apologise? A closer look at medical malpractice laws. Drake
Law Rev Discourse 2020;69:101-119. https://doi.org/10.29158/jaapl.200107-20
LeCraw F R, Stearns SC, McCoy MJ. How US teams advanced communication and resolution program
adoption at local, state and national levels. J Patient Safety Risk Manage 2021;26(1):34-40. https://doi.
org/10.1177/2516043520973818
Mello MM, Kachalia A, Roche R, et al. Outcomes in two Massachusetts hospital systems give reason
for optimism about communication and resolution programs. Health Affairs 2017;36(10):1795-1803.
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0320
Jean-Pierre P. Medical error and vulnerable communities. Boston Law Rev 2022;102(1):327.
Gallagher TH, Boothman RC, Schweitzer L, Benjamin EM. Making communication and resolution
programmes mission critical in healthcare organisations. BMJ Qual Safety 2020;29(11):875-878.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010855
Mello MM, Armstrong SJ, Greenberg Y, McCotter PI, Gallagher TH. Challenges of implementing
a communication‐and‐resolution program where multiple organizations must co-operate. Health
Services Research 2016;51(S3):S2550-S2568. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12580
Mello MM, Roche S, Greenberg Y, Folcarelli PH, Van Niel MB, Kachalia A. Ensuring successful
implementation of communication-and-resolution programmes. BMJ Qual Safety 2020;29(11):895-
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010296
Health Professions Council of South Africa. Guidelines for Good Practice in Health Care Professions –
General Ethical Guidelines for the Health Care Professions. Booklet 1, Pretoria: HPCSA, 2021. https://
www.hpcsa.co.za/Uploads/professional_practice/ethics/Booklet_1_Guidelines_for_Good_Practice_
vDec_2021.pdf (accessed 29 February 2024).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 M S Khan, M C Laubscher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing Information
The SAMJ is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
Publishing Rights
Authors grant the Publisher the exclusive right to publish, display, reproduce and/or distribute the Work in print and electronic format and in any medium known or hereafter developed, including for commercial use. The Author also agrees that the Publisher may retain in print or electronic format more than one copy of the Work for the purpose of preservation, security and back-up.
