Rural-urban disparities and socioeconomic determinants of caesarean delivery rates in Zimbabwe: Evidence from the 2019 National Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i17.1882Keywords:
Caesarean Section, Women, MICS 2019 , ZimbabweAbstract
Caesarean sections (CSs) have increased globally, with concerns being raised involving overutilisation and inequalities in access. In Zimbabwe, where healthcare access varies greatly, we aimed to analyse factors associated with ever having a CS using the 2019 National Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey. The weighted national CS rate was 10.3%, and CS happened more commonly among women in urban than rural areas (15.7% v. 7.4%; odds ratio (OR) 2.34; (95% confidence interval (CI)) 1.71 - 3.20; p=0.001). Percentages of those having a CS significantly increased with education: overall χ2 for a trend of p=0.001 and wealth quintile, and overall χ2 for a trend of p=0.001. Women with insurance coverage were more likely to have had a CS than those without: 26.7% v. 8.7%; OR 3.82; 95% CI 2.51 - 5.83; p=0.001. The same was the case for women with access to the internet: 15.4% v. 7.0%, OR 2.42; 95%CI 1.71 - 3.41; p=0.001). These findings show an association that could indicate this being overutilised by insured women in urban settings, rather than being accessible based on clinical needs. Further research should explore reasons for these disparities and inform interventions to ensure equitable access to optimum childbirth in Zimbabwe.
References
Zakerihamidi M, Roudsari RL, Khoei EM. Vaginal delivery vs. cesarean section: A focused ethnographic study of women’s perceptions in The North of Iran. Int J Community-Based Nurs Midwifery 2015;3(1):39.
Lori JR, Boyle JS. Cultural childbirth practices, beliefs, and traditions in post-conflict Liberia. Health Care Women Int 2011;32(6):454-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2011.555831
World Health Organization. Indicators to monitor maternal health goals. Geneva: WHO, 1994.
Dumont A, De Bernis L, Bouvier-olle M-H, Bréart G, Group MS. Caesarean section rate for maternal indication in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. Lancet 2001;358(9290):1328-1333. https://doi.
org/10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06414-5
Haider MR, Rahman MM, Moinuddin M, Rahman AE, Ahmed S, Khan MM. Ever-increasing caesarean section and its economic burden in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE 2018;13(12):e0208623. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208623
Farmer TW, Estell DB, Leung M-C, Trott H, Bishop J, Cairns BD. Individual characteristics, early adolescent peer affiliations, and school dropout: An examination of aggressive and popular group types. J School Psychol 2003;41(3):217-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(03)00046-3
Hasan MN, Chowdhury MAB, Jahan J, Jahan S, Ahme, NU, Jamal Uddin MJ. Cesarean delivery and early childhood diseases in Bangladesh: An analysis of Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) and Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS). PLoS ONE 2020;15(12):e0242864. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0242864
Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency and United Nations Children’s Fund. Zimbabwe Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2019, survey findings report. Harare, Zimbabwe: ZIMSTAT and UNICEF.
Savage W. The caesarean section epidemic. J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;20:223-225. https://doi.
org/10.1080/01443610050009485
World Health Organization Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2(8452):436-437. https://
doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92750-3
Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, regional and national estimates: 1990 - 2014. PLoS ONE 2016;11(2):e0148343. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
Huang K, Tao F, Faragher B, et al. A mixed-method study of factors associated with differences in caesarean section rates at community level: The case of rural China. Midwifery 2013;29(8):911-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.11.003
Skalkidis Y, Petridou E, Papathoma E, Revinthi K, Tong D, Trichopoulos D. Are operative delivery procedures in Greece socially conditioned? Int J Qual Health Care 1996;8(2):159-165. https://doi. org/10.1093/intqhc/8.2.159
Tatar M, Gunalp S, Somunoglu S, Demirol A. Women’s perceptions of caesarean section: Reflections from a Turkish teaching hospital. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:1227-1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277- 9536(99)00315-9
Stanton CK, Holtz SA. Levels and trends in caesarean birth in the developing world. Stud Fam Plan 2006;37(1):41-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2006.00082.x
Walker R, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C. Strategies to address global cesarean section rates: A review of the evidence. Birth 2002;29(1):28-39. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536x.2002.00153.x
Aminu M, Utz B, Halim A, van den Broek N. Reasons for performing a caesarean section in public hospitals in rural Bangladesh. BMC Preg Childbirth 2014;14(1):130. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/1471- 2393-14-130
Omole-Ohonsi A, Attah R. Risk factors for ruptured uterus in a developing country. Gynecol Obstetric 2011;21:102. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0932.1000102
Motomura K, Ganchimeg T, Nagata C, et al. Incidence and outcomes of uterine rupture among women with prior caesarean section: WHO multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health. Sci Rep 2017;7:44093. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44093
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 G N Musuka, G Murewanhema, H Herrera, E Mbunge, R Birri-Makota, T Dzinamarira, D Cuadros, I Chingombe, A Mpofu, M Mapingure
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing Information
The SAMJ is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
Publishing Rights
Authors grant the Publisher the exclusive right to publish, display, reproduce and/or distribute the Work in print and electronic format and in any medium known or hereafter developed, including for commercial use. The Author also agrees that the Publisher may retain in print or electronic format more than one copy of the Work for the purpose of preservation, security and back-up.
