Estimating the changing burden of disease attributable to unsafe water and lack of sanitation and hygiene in South Africa for 2000, 2006 and 2012
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2022.v112i8b.16498Keywords:
diarrhoeal disease, health surveysAbstract
Background. The incidence of diarrhoeal disease is closely linked to socioeconomic and environmental factors, household practices and access to health services. South African (SA) district health information and national survey data report wide variation in the incidence and prevalence of diarrhoeal episodes in children under 5 years of age. These differentials indicate potential for reducing the disease burden through improvements in provision of water and sanitation services and changes in hygiene behaviour.
Objectives. To estimate the burden of disease attributed to unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) by province, sex and age group for SA in 2000, 2006 and 2012.
Methods. Comparative risk assessment methodology was used to estimate the disease burden attributable to an exposure by comparing the observed risk factor distribution with a theoretical lowest possible population distribution. The study adapts the original World Health Organization scenario-based approach for estimating diarrhoeal disease burden from unsafe WASH, by assigning different standards of household water and sanitation-specific geographical classification to capture SA living conditions in rural, urban and informal settlements.
Results. SA experienced an improvement in water and sanitation supply in eight of the nine provinces between 2001 and 2011, with the exception of Northern Cape Province. In 2011, 41% of South Africans lived with poor water and sanitation conditions; however, wide provincial inequalities exist. In 2012, it was estimated that 84.1% of all deaths due to diarrhoeal disease were attributable to unsafe WASH; this equates to 13 757 deaths (95% uncertainty interval (UI) 13 015 - 14 300). Of these diarrhoeal disease deaths, 48.2% occurred in children under 5 years of age, accounting for 13.9% of all deaths in this age group (95% UI 13.1 - 14.4). Between 2000 and 2012, the proportion of deaths attributable to diarrhoea reduced from 3.6% to 2.6%. Gauteng and Western Cape provinces experienced much lower WASHattributable death rates than the more rural, poorer provinces.
Conclusion. Unsafe WASH remains an important risk factor for disease in SA, especially in children. High priority needs to be given to the provision of safe and sustainable sanitation and water facilities and promoting safe hygiene behaviours. The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced the critical importance of clean water for preventing and containing disease.
References
Massyn N, Peer N, Padarath A, Barron P, Day C, eds. District Health Barometer 2014/15. Durban: Health Systems Trust, 2015.
Nannan N, Groenewald N, Pillay-van Wyk V, et al. Child mortality trends and causes of death inSouth Africa, 1997 - 2012, and the importance of a national burden of disease study. S Afr Med J 2019;109(7):480-485. https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.2019.v109i7.13717
Massyn N, Day C, Barron P, Haynes R, English R, Padarath A, eds. District Health Barometer 2011/12. Durban: Health Systems Trust, 2013.
National Department of Health, Medical Research Council, OrcMacro. South Africa Demographic and Health Survey 1998. Pretoria: NDoH, 2002.
National Department of Health, Medical Research Council, OrcMacro. South Africa Demographic and Health Survey 2003. Pretoria: NDoH, 2007.
National Department of Health, Statistics South Africa, South African Medical Research Council and ICF. South Africa Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Pretoria, South Africa and Rockville, USA: NDoH, Stats SA, SAMRC and ICF, 2019.
World Health Organization. Diarrhoeal disease. 2017. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diarrhoeal-disease (accessed 19 May 2021).
World Health Organization. Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH). https://www.who.int/healthtopics/water-sanitation-and-hygiene-wash (accessed 3 February 2021).
United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-09/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2020 (accessed 3 February 2021).
South African Human Rights Commission. Water and sanitation, revised pamphlet. 2018. https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Water%20and%20Sanitation%20revised%20pamphlet%2020%20March%202018.pdf (accessed 19 May 2021).
Prüss A, Kay D, Fewtrell L, Bartram J. Estimating the burden of disease from water, sanitation, and hygiene at a global level. Environ Health Perspect 2002;110(5):537-542. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.02110537
Lewin S, Norman R, Nannan N, Thomas E, Bradshaw D and the South African Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group. Estimating the burden of disease attributable to unsafe water and lack of sanitation and hygiene in South Africa in 2000. S Afr Med J 2007;97(8):755-762. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh.2010.25.2.87
Prüss-Üstün A, Kay D, Fewtrell L, Bartram J. Unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene. In: Ezzati M, Lopez A, Rogers A, Murray CJL, eds. Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004:1321-1353.
Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990 - 2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380(9859):2224-2260. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61766-8
Global Burden of Disease 2013 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990 - 2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015;386(10010):2287-2323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00128-2
Global Burden of Disease 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990 - 2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016;388(10053):1659-1724. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.751
Food Standards Agency. A Report of the Study of Infectious Intestinal Disease in England. London:
HMSO, 2000.
Murray CJL, Lopez A, eds. Global Health Statistics: A Compendium of Incidence, Prevalence and Mortality Estimates for over 200 Conditions. Global Burden of Disease and Injury. Vol. 2. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard School of Public Health on behalf of the World Health Organization, 1996.
Esrey SA. Water, waste, and well-being: A multicountry study. Am J Epidemiol 1996;143(6):608-623. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008791
Mead PS, Abdel-Moneim M, al-Erian RA, al-Amari OM. Food-related illness and death in the United
States. Emerg Infect Dis 1999;5(5):607-625.
Huttly SRA, Morris SS, Pisani V. Prevention of diarrhoea in young children in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 1997;75(2):163-174.
Statistics South Africa. Census 2001: Census in Brief. Pretoria: Stats SA, 2003.
Statistics South Africa. Census 2011 Statistical release – P0301.4. Pretoria: Stats SA, 2012.
Statistics South Africa. Community Survey, 2007 (revised version). Statistical release P0301. Pretoria:
Stats SA, 2007.
Pillay-van Wyk V, Msemburi W, Laubscher R, et al. Mortality trends and differentials in South Africa from 1997 to 2012: Second National Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health 2016;4(9):e642-e653. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30113-9
Dorrington R. Alternative South African mid-year estimates, 2013. Cape Town: Centre for Actuarial Research, University of Cape Town, 2013.
Ahmad OB, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez AD, et al. Age standardisation of rates: A new WHO standard. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No. 31 EIP/GPE/EBD. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
Barendregt JJ. The effect size in uncertainty analysis. Value Health 2010;13(4):388-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00686
Troeger C, and the Global Burden of Disease 2016 Diarrhoeal Disease Collaborators. Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoea in 195 countries: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18(11):1211-1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30362-1
Colombara DV, Khalil IA-M, Rao PC, et al. Chronic health consequences of acute enteric infections in the developing world. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;3(Suppl):4-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajgsup.2016.9
Groome MJ, Zell ER, Solomon F, et al. Temporal association of rotavirus vaccine introduction and reduction in all-cause childhood diarrheal hospitalisations in South Africa. Clin Infect Dis 2016;62(Suppl 2):S188-S195. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ1204
Jagals P, Nala NP, Tsubane TJ, Moabi M, Motaung KC. Measuring changes in water-related health and
hygiene practices by developing-community households. Water Sci Technol 2004;50(1):91-97. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2004.0027
Muller M, Erasmus J. Money down the drain: Corruption in South Africa’s water sector. Corruption Watch and the Water Integrity Network, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 N Nannan, I Neethling, A Cois, R Laubscher, E B Turawa, R Pacella, D Bradshaw, V Pillay-van Wyk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing Information
The SAMJ is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
Publishing Rights
Authors grant the Publisher the exclusive right to publish, display, reproduce and/or distribute the Work in print and electronic format and in any medium known or hereafter developed, including for commercial use. The Author also agrees that the Publisher may retain in print or electronic format more than one copy of the Work for the purpose of preservation, security and back-up.
