Further evidence of misclassification of the injury deaths in South Africa: When will the barriers to accurate injury death statistics be removed?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2023.v113i9.836Keywords:
Mortality, Injury, firearm-related deaths, South AfricaAbstract
Background. Contrary to the World Health Organization’s internationally recommended medical certificate of cause of death, the South African (SA) death notification form (DNF) does not allow for the reporting of the manner of death to permit accurate coding of external causes of injury deaths.
Objectives. To describe the injury cause-of-death profile from forensic pathology records collected for the National Cause-of-Death Validation (NCoDV) Project and compare it with profiles from other sources of injury mortality data. In particular, the recording of firearm use in homicides is compared between sources.
Methods. The NCoDV Project was a cross-sectional study of deaths that occurred during a fixed period in 2017 and 2018, from a nationally representative sample of 27 health subdistricts in SA. Trained fieldworkers scanned forensic records for all deaths investigated at the forensic mortuaries serving the sampled subdistricts during the study period. Forensic practitioners reviewed the records and completed a medical certificate of cause of death for each decedent. Causes of death were coded to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), using Iris automated coding software. Cause-specific mortality fractions for injury deaths were compared with Injury Mortality Survey 2017 (IMS 2017) and Statistics South Africa 2017 (Stats SA 2017) datasets. The cause profile for all firearm-related deaths was compared between the three datasets.
Results. A total of 5 315 records were available for analysis. Males accounted for 77.6% of cases, and most decedents were aged between 25 and 44 years. Homicide was the leading cause of death (34.7%), followed by transport injuries (32.6%) and suicide (14.7%). This injury cause profile was similar to IMS 2017 but differed markedly from the official statistics, which showed markedly lower proportions of these three causes (15.0%, 11.6% and 0.7%, respectively), and a much higher proportion of other unintentional causes. Investigation of firearm-related deaths revealed that most were homicides in NCoDV 2017/18 (88.5%) and IMS 2017 (93.1%), while in the Stats SA 2017 data, 98.7% of firearm deaths were classified as accidental. Approximately 7% of firearm-related deaths were suicides in NCoDV 2017/18 and IMS 2017, with only 0.3% in Stats SA 2017.
Conclusion. The official cause-of-death data for injuries in SA in 2017 differed substantially from findings from the NCoDV 2017/18 study and IMS 2017. Accurate data sources would ensure that public health interventions are designed to reduce the high injury burden. Inclusion of the manner of death on the DNF, as is recommended internationally, is critically important to enable more accurate, reliable and valid reporting of the injury profile.
References
Prinsloo M, Bradshaw D, Joubert J, Matzopoulos R, Groenewald P. South Africa’s vital statistics are currently not suitable for monitoring progress towards injury and violence Sustainable Development Goals. S Afr Med J 2017;107(6):470-471. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i6.12464
World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision, version for 2016. Geneva: WHO, 2016. http://apps.who.int/classifications/ icd10/browse/2016/en (accessed 6 March 2023).
Matzopoulos R, Groenewald P, Abrahams N, Bradshaw D. Where have all the gun deaths gone? S Afr Med J 2016;106(6):589-591. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i6.10379
South Africa. Inquests Act 58 of 1959. https://www.gov.za/documents/inquests-act-3-jul-1959-0000 (accessed 6 March 2023).
Norman R, Matzopoulos R, Groenewald P, Bradshaw D. The high burden of injuries in South Africa. Bull World Health Organ 2007;85(9):695-702. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.06.037184
Matzopoulos R, Prinsloo M, Bradshaw D, et al. The Injury Mortality Survey: A national study of injury mortality levels and causes in South Africa in 2009. Cape Town: South African Medical Research Council, 2013. https://www.samrc.ac.za/sites/default/files/attachments/2022-08/InjuryMortalitySurvey. pdf (accessed 9 August 2023).
Prinsloo M, Mhlongo S, Dekel B, et al. The 2nd Injury Mortality Survey: A national study of injury mortality levels and causes in South Africa in 2017. Cape Town: South African Medical Research Council, 2021. https://www.samrc.ac.za/sites/default/files/attachments/2022-08/The%202nd%20 Injury%20Mortality%20Survey%20Report_Final.pdf (accessed 9 August 2023).
Bradshaw D, Joubert JD, Maqungo M, et al. South African National Cause-of-Death Validation Project: Methodology and description of a national sample of verbal autopsies. Cape Town: South African Medical Research Council, 2020. https://www.samrc.ac.za/research-reports/south-african-national- cause-death-validation (accessed 9 August 2023).
Harvard Humanitarian Initiative. KoboToolbox: Data collection tools for challenging environments. http://www.kobotoolbox.org/ (accessed 6 March 2023).
ClearScanner.https://clear-scanner-free-pdf-scans.en.softonic.com/android(accessed11December2019). 11. Dropbox Business. https://www.dropbox.com/business (accessed 11 December 2019).
Dorrington RE, Bradshaw D, Laubscher R, Nannan N. Rapid Mortality Surveillance report 2019 &
Cape Town: South African Medical Research Council, 2021. https://www.samrc.ac.za/sites/ default/files/attachments/2022-08/Rapid%20Mortality%20Surveillance%20Report%202019%262020. pdf (accessed 6 March 2023).
Iris Institute. Iris – Automated coding system for causes of death. Heidelberg, Germany: German Institute of Medical Documentation and Information (DIMDI), 2018.
MicrosoftCorporation.MicrosoftExcel.2018.https://office.microsoft.com/excel(accessed6March2023). 15. Mikkelsen L, Moesgaard K, Hegnauer M, Lopez AD. ANACONDA: A new tool to improve mortality
and cause of death data. BMC Med 2020;18:61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01521-0
World Health Organization. Verbal autopsy standards: The 2016 WHO verbal autopsy instrument. Geneva: WHO, 2016. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/verbal-autopsy-standards-the-2016-
who-verbal-autopsy-instrument (accessed 10 August 2023).
Pillay-vanWykV,LaubscherR,MsemburiW,etal.SecondSouthAfricanNationalBurdenofDisease
Study: Data cleaning, validation and SANBD list. Cape Town: South African Medical Research Council, 2014. https://www.samrc.ac.za/sites/default/files/attachments/2022-08/SANBDReport.pdf (accessed 10 August 2023).
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, Texas: StataCorp, 2019.
Statistics South Africa. Mortality and causes of death in South Africa, 2017: Findings from death notification. Pretoria: Stats SA, 26 March 2020. https://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P03093/
P030932017.pdf (accessed 10 August 2023).
South Africa. National Health Act, 2003 (Act No. 61 of 2003). Regulations regarding the rendering of
Forensic Pathology Service. Government Gazette No. 41524, 23 March 2018. https://www.gov.za/sites/
default/files/gcis_document/201803/41524rg10811gon359s.pdf (accessed 10 August 2023).
Knipe D, John A, Padmanathan P, et al. Suicide and self-harm in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. PLoS Glob Public Health 2022;2(6):e0000282.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000282
Groenewald P, Azvedo V, Daniels J, Evans J, Naledi T, Bradshaw D. The importance of identified cause- of-death information being available for public health surveillance, actions and research. S Afr Med J 2015;105(7):528-530. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJnew.8019
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 P Groenewald, N Kallis, C Holmgren, T Glass, A Anthony, P Maud, Y Akhalwaya, E Afonso, I Niewoudt, L J Martin, C de Vaal, M Cheyip, D Morof, M Prinsloo, R Matzopoulos, D Bradshaw
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing Information
The SAMJ is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
Publishing Rights
Authors grant the Publisher the exclusive right to publish, display, reproduce and/or distribute the Work in print and electronic format and in any medium known or hereafter developed, including for commercial use. The Author also agrees that the Publisher may retain in print or electronic format more than one copy of the Work for the purpose of preservation, security and back-up.
