Right of Reply
Countering obstetricians’ deflections: The role of magnetic resonance imaging in cerebral palsy litigation in South Africa in context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2022.v112i8.16702Keywords:
neonatal, obstetricsAbstract
To the Editor: The article by Bhorat et al. [1] in the SAMJ, entitled ‘Cerebral palsy and criteria implicating intrapartum hypoxia in
neonatal encephalopathy – an obstetric perspective for the South African setting’, starts off by raising concerns about ‘steep rises in
insurance premiums, placing service delivery under serious threat’. It does not acknowledge any service delivery issues that already exist in the public sector obstetric services in South Africa (SA). According to Whittaker,[2] in 2019, there were 303 obstetricians and gynaecologists employed in the SA public sector and 579 in the private sector, and of those employed in the public sector, 190 were performing private sector work. That a large number of the children with cerebral palsy (CP) were delivered in the public sector service was not noted by Bhorat et al.,[1] nor was the fact that the overwhelming majority of court cases are against the state (not against individual doctors) in provinces and hospitals with significant medical staffing and resource issues. For example, the liabilities for Eastern Cape Province in the 2019/20 period were ZAR36 751 207 v. only ZAR33 155 in Western Cape Province for the same period.[2]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 S Andronikou, J W Lotz, I Bhorat, E Buchamann, P Soma-Pillay, E Nicolaou, L Pistorius, I Smuts
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing Information
The SAMJ is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
Publishing Rights
Authors grant the Publisher the exclusive right to publish, display, reproduce and/or distribute the Work in print and electronic format and in any medium known or hereafter developed, including for commercial use. The Author also agrees that the Publisher may retain in print or electronic format more than one copy of the Work for the purpose of preservation, security and back-up.
