Unpacking the legality of termination of pregnancy based on ‘social grounds’ under South African law

Main Article Content

M Khan

Abstract





The topic of abortion was in the limelight again in Dobbs v Jackson, where the US Supreme Court overturned the decision of Roe v Wade, ‘which guaranteed women and pregnant people a constitutional right to abortion’. While not bound by the judgment, this gives us an opportunity to reflect on the current law in South Africa which regulates the termination of pregnancy. The primary piece of legislation which governs abortion is the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act. Section 2 of the Act lists the grounds under which one may lawfully terminate a pregnancy. One of those grounds relates to the period of the 13th up until the 20th week of the gestation period, and states that if a medical practitioner, after consultation with the pregnant woman, is of the opinion that the continued pregnancy would significantly affect the social or economic circumstances of the woman, then the pregnancy may be lawfully terminated. The question is: What exactly is meant by ‘social grounds’? This article considers this aspect from a legal perspective and attempts to provide clarity on the issue, in the hope that this will be of assistance to medical practitioners who are concerned about the outcome of their actions, when assisting persons in this position.





Article Details

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Unpacking the legality of termination of pregnancy based on ‘social grounds’ under South African law. (2023). South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 16(2), 55. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2023.v16i1.1033

References

Christian Lawyers Association v Minister of Health (Reproductive Health Alliance as Amicus Curiae) 2005 (1) SA 509 (T) para 698.

South Africa. Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996. https://www.gov. za/documents/choice-termination-pregnancy-act (accessed 2 May 2023).

ConstitutionoftheRepublicofSouthAfrica1996.https://www.gov.za/documents/ constitution-republic-south-africa-1996 (accessed 2 May 2023).

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996. S12.

Christian Lawyers Association v Minister of Health case no. 7728/2000 (TPD).

Sun N. Overturning Roe v Wade: Reproducing injustice. BMJ 2022;377:1-2. https://

doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1588

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996. S39.

Favier M, Greenberg JMS, Stevens M. Safe abortion in South Africa: We have

wonderful laws but we don’t have people to implement those laws. Int J Gynecol

Obstet 2018;143(Suppl 4):38-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12676

South Africa. Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996. S 2(1)(b)

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996. S 2.

South Africa. National Health Act 61 of 2003. https://www.gov.za/documents/

national-health-act (accessed 2 May 2023).

South Africa. National Health Act 61 of 2003. S 2(c)(i)

South Africa. Abortion and Sterilisation Act 2 of 1975. https://www.lexisnexis.co.za/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/820325/Abortion-and-Sterilisation-Act-No.-2-of-1975.pdf (accessed 2 May 2023).

McQuoid-Mason DJ. Termination of pregnancy: Cultural practices, the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act and the constitutional rights of children. S Afr Med J 2018;108(9):721-723. https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.2018.v108i9.13289

Du Plessis L. Re-interpretation of Statutes. Pietermaritzburg: LexisNexis, 2004:102. 16. Du Plessis L. Re-interpretation of Statutes. Pietermaritzburg: LexisNexis, 2004:103. 17. Du Plessis L Re-interpretation of Statutes. Pietermaritzburg: LexisNexis, 2004:106. 18. Du Plessis L Re-interpretation of Statutes. Pietermaritzburg: LexisNexis, 2004:93. 19. Du Plessis L Re-interpretation of Statutes. Pietermaritzburg: LexisNexis, 2004:103-104.

Du Plessis L. Re-interpretation of Statutes. Pietermaritzburg: LexisNexis, 2004:104.

Powsa v Member of the Executive Council for Economic Affairs, Environmentalism and Tourism, Eastern Cape 2001 3 SA 582 (SCA) para 10.

Du Plessis L. Re-interpretation of Statutes. Pietermaritzburg: LexisNexis, 2004:94.

Botha C. Statutory Interpretation, 4th ed. Cape Town: Juta, 2010: 86.

Oxford Online Dictionary https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/ english/social_1?q=social (accessed 22 February 2023).

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996. S 9.