Promoting research integrity through the lens of virtue ethics and deontological approach

Main Article Content

S Koali
N Khasoane
M Mongezi

Abstract





Issues pertaining to research misconduct and/or breach of research norms and standards have recently come to occupy a central place in research activities. In this article, we argue that a moral character-based approach (Aristotelian virtue ethics) and a self-regulating approach (Kantian deontology) can play a vital role if incorporated in health research ethics training workshops for research ethics committees (RECs) and researchers. We are of the view that on top of what institutions can develop as their best ethics guidelines, policies and regulatory framework, they should also prioritise capacitating their RECs and researchers on virtue ethics to make them appreciate the primacy of virtuous character when reviewing protocols and during the conduct of research. We, therefore, suggest that capacity building through research ethics training should incorporate the moral theories focusing on self-regulating and acquisition of moral character because these moral theories provide the underpinnings of the moral basis in respect of humanity and dignity, integrity, attainment of virtues and development of moral character.





Article Details

How to Cite
Promoting research integrity through the lens of virtue ethics and deontological approach. (2024). South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 17(2), e1671. https://doi.org/10.7196/
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

Promoting research integrity through the lens of virtue ethics and deontological approach. (2024). South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 17(2), e1671. https://doi.org/10.7196/

References

Gilbert FJ, Denison AR. Research misconduct. Clin Radio 2003;58(7):499-504.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(03)00176-4

Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, USA; 2001.

Ballyram R, Nienaber A. Research misconduct and publication ethics: A South African perspective. S Afr Dental J 2019;74(1):24-31. https://doi.org/10.17159/2519-0105/2019/ v74no1a4

World Health Organization. Research ethics committees: Basic concepts for capacity-building. World Health Organization; 2009.

Kombe F, Anunobi EN, Tshifugula NP, et al. Promoting research integrity in Africa: An African voice of concern on research misconduct and the way forward. Dev World Bioethics 2014;14(3):158-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12024

Lescano AR, Blazes DL, Montano SM, et al. Research ethics training in Peru: A case study. PLoS One 2008 ;3(9):e3274. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003274 7. Rivera R, Borasky D, Rice R, Carayon F. Many worlds, one ethic: Design and development of a global research ethics training curriculum. Dev World Bioethics

;5(2):169-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2005.00111.x

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Bulletin of Med Ethics 2002;182:17-23. https://cioms.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WEB-

CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdf (accessed 17 October 2023).

Chen DT. Curricular approaches to research ethics training for psychiatric

investigators. Psychopharmacol 2003;171:112-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/

s00213-003-1500-4

Ndebele P, Wassenaar D, Benatar S, et al. Research ethics capacity building in sub- Saharan Africa: A review of NIH Fogarty-funded programs 2000-2012. J Empir Res Human Res Ethics 2014;9(2):24-40. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2014.9.2.24

Horn L. Promoting responsible research conduct: A South African perspective. J Acad Ethics 2017;15(1):59-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-016-9272-8

Halkoaho A, Matveinen M, Leinonen V, Luoto K, Keränen T. Education of research ethics for clinical investigators with Moodle tool. BMC Med Ethics 2013;14(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-53

Banks S. Cultivating researcher integrity: Virtue-based approaches to research ethics. In Virtue ethics in the conduct and governance of social science research. Emerald Publishing Ltd. 2018:21-44.

Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. F.H. Peters (trans.) London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co., Ltd. 1906.

Di Muzio G. Aristotle on improving one’s character. Phronesis 2000;45(3):205- 219.16.

MacIntyre A. After virtue: A study in moral theory. University of Notre Dame Press. 17. Gregor M. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press. 1997.

Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA). 2007. general ethical

guidelines for biotechnology research. Booklet14. https://www.hpcsa.co.za/ Uploads/professional_practice/ethics/Booklet_14_Biotechnology_Research_in_ SA_September_2016.pdf.

RepublicofSouthAfrica.NationalHealthActNo.61.Pretoria:GovernmentGazette, 2004;26595. http://www.gov.za/sites/www.gov.za/files/a61-03.pdf (accessed 25 October 2023)

National Health Act (Act No 61 of 2003). Government Gazette, RSA; vol 469, no. 26595; 23 July 2004. http://www.info.gov.za/view/Download File Action?id=68039 (accessed 17 October 2023).

South African Department of Health. Ethics in health research: Principles, structures and processes. Pretoria; 2015.

Dimmock M, Fisher A. Ethics for A-level. Open Book Publishers; 2017.

Bhuyan N. The role of character in ethical decision-making. J Value Inquiry

;41:45.

Morris MC, Morris JZ. The importance of virtue ethics in the IRB. Res Ethics 2016;12(4):201-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116656023

Athanassoulis N. Virtue ethics. Virtue Ethics. 2012:1-76.

Sedley D. Socratic irony in the Platonist commentators. New Perspectives on

Plato, Modern and Ancient 2002;6:37.

Sganzerla A, Siqueira JE, Guérios TR. Ethics of virtue applied to medical

deontology. Revista Bioética 2022;30:482-491.

Welchman J. Virtue ethics and human development: A pragmatic approach. Virtue

Ethics, Old and New 2005:143-55. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501724275-009

Ryle G. Can virtue be taught? In: Education and the Development of Reason. Int Library Phil Educ 2010;8:323-332.

FowersBJ,CarrollJS,LeonhardtND,CokeletB.Theemergingscienceofvirtue.Perspect Psychol Sci 2021;16(1):118-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620924473