Risk and liability in collaborative mental healthcare between psychologists, psychiatrists and traditional healers in South Africa
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. South Africa (SA)’s pluralistic mental health system reflects a coexistence of biomedical and traditional healing paradigms. While this plurality enhances cultural accessibility and patient trust, it also raises ethical and legal uncertainty regarding professional accountability and liability. The absence of harmonised governance between the Health Professions Council of South Africa and the Traditional Health Practitioners Council complicates interprofessional collaboration and increases the risk of professional exposure.
Objectives. To explore how psychologists, psychiatrists and traditional health practitioners (THPs) understand risk, liability and accountability in pluralistic mental healthcare, and to identify areas where ethical and legal frameworks could be strengthened to support culturally responsive and legally coherent collaboration.
Methods. A qualitative exploratory-descriptive design was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 practitioners, comprising psychologists, psychiatrists and THPs. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic framework to identify shared and divergent understandings of professional responsibility, ethical practice and legal accountability.
Results. Three overarching themes emerged: ambiguity in professional accountability, ethical tensions arising from cultural responsibility, and the need for policy and legal reform. Practitioners recognised the value of pluralistic care, but cited an absence of clear ethical guidance, referral systems and shared documentation protocols. Psychologists and psychiatrists expressed concern about malpractice liability, while THPs highlighted marginalisation within formal regulation. Participants emphasised the importance of ethical frameworks that respect cultural pluralism while protecting professional integrity and patient safety.
Conclusion. Pluralistic collaboration is an established feature of mental healthcare in SA, but remains ethically and legally underdefined. Aligning the Health Professions Act 56 of 1974 and the Traditional Health Practitioners Act 22 of 2007 through joint policy development would clarify accountability and reduce liability risk. Interprofessional ethics education and formal referral mechanisms are essential to integrate cultural legitimacy with legal coherence.
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The SAJBL is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
1. Galvin M, Chiwaye L, Moolla A. Religious and medical pluralism among traditional healers in Johannesburg, South Africa. J Relig Health 2024;63(2):907-923. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10943-023-01795-7
2. Masola NJ, Maotoana M, Mokgalapa K, Ngobeni N. Traditional health practitioners’ perspectives on the integration of traditional and Western medicine within South Africa’s legal framework. Afr J Interdiscip Multidiscip Stud 2025;7(3):1-12. https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v7i2.3605
3. Moshabela M, Zuma T, Gaede B. Bridging the gap between biomedical and traditional health practitioners in South Africa. In: Padarath A, King J, Mackie E, Casciola J, eds. South African Health Review 2016. Durban: Health Systems Trust, 2016:83-92. https://www.hst.org.za/publications/South%20 African%20Health%20Reviews/8%20Bridging%20the%20gap%20between%20 biomedical%20and%20traditional%20health%20practitioners%20in%20 South%20Africa.pdf (accessed 15 October 2025).
4. South Africa. Traditional Health Practitioners Act 22 of 2007. https://www.gov. za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/a22-07.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt. com (accessed 12 September 2025).
5. Audet CM, Ngobeni S, Graves E, Wagner RG. Mixed methods inquiry into traditional healers’ treatment of mental, neurological and substance abuse disorders in rural South Africa. PLoS ONE 2017;12(12):e0188433. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188433
6. Menze N, van der Watt ASJ, Moxley K, Seedat S. Profiles of traditional healers and their healing practices in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. S Afr J Psychiatry 2018;24:1305. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v24i0.1305
7. Mbatha N, Street RA, Ngcobo M, Gqaleni N. Sick certificates issued by South African traditional health practitioners: Current legislation, challenges and the way forward. S Afr Med J 2012;102(3 Pt 1):129-131.
8. Health Professions Council of South Africa. Ethical Rules of Conduct for Practitioners Registered under the Health Professions Act, 1974 (Act 56 of 1974). Published under Government Notice R717 of 2006. Pretoria: HPCSA, 2006. https://www.hpcsa.co.za/ethics (accessed 15 June 2025).
9. South Africa. Health Professions Act 56 of 1974. https://www.gov.za/sites/ default/files/gcis_document/201505/act-56-1974.pdf (accessed 15 June 2025).
10. Nzimande S, Zuma T, Moshabela M. What is the nature of research conducted on regulating traditional health practitioners? A scoping review. J Glob Health Rep 2021;5:e2021033. https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.28357
11. SouthAfrica.NationalHealthAct61of2003.https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/ gcis_document/201409/a61-03.pdf (accessed 15 June 2025).
12. National Department of Health, Republic of South Africa. Ethics in Health Research: Principles, Processes and Structures. 3rd ed. Pretoria: NDoH, 2024. https://www. health.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/NDoH-2024-Health-Research- Guidelines-3rdEdition-v0.1.pdf (accessed 16 May 2025).
13. ReadUM,JilkaS,SinghSP.Collaboratingwithtraditionalandfaithhealersinmental health: A public health approach. World Soc Psychiatry 2023;5(2):144-148. https:// doi.org/10.4103/wsp.wsp_28_23
14. Carstens P, Pearmain D. Foundational Principles of South African Medical Law. 2nd ed. Durban: LexisNexis, 2021.
15. South Africa. Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013. https://www.gov.za/ sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/3706726-11act4of2013protectionofper sonalinforcorrect.pdf (accessed 9 June 2025).
16. Jama NA, Nyembezi A, Ngcobo S, Lehmann U. Collaboration between traditional health practitioners and biomedical health practitioners: Scoping review. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med 2024;16(1):a4430. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4430
17. Abbo C, Ekblad S, Waako P, Okello E, Musisi S. The prevalence and severity of mental illnesses handled by traditional healers in two districts in Uganda. Afr Health Sci 2009;9(Suppl 1):S16-S22.
18. World Health Organization. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy: 2014 - 2023. Geneva: WHO, 2013. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/92455 (accessed 13 March 2025).
19. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 8th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
20. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 2000;23(4):334-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid- nur9>3.0.co;2-g
21. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2018.
22. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2015.
23. Yew-Siong L. Extending psychological praxis within South Africa: Exploring healers’ perceptions of treatment plurality. Doctoral thesis. Gqeberha: Nelson Mandela University, 2024.
24. Braun V, Clarke V. Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. Int J Transgend Health 2023;24(1):1- 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
25. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.
26. Sorsdahl K, Flisher AJ, Wilson Z, Stein DJ. Explanatory models of mental disorders and treatment practices among traditional healers in Mpumulanga, South Africa.
Afr J Psychiatry 2010;13(4):284-290. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajpsy.v13i4.61878
27. Mokgobi MG. Understanding traditional African healing. Afr J Phys Health Educ
Recreat Dance 2014;20(Suppl 2):24-34.
28. Jilka S, Winsper C, Johnson SA, et al. A scoping review to evaluate the efficacy of
combining traditional healing and modern psychiatry in global mental healthcare.
Glob Ment Health (Camb) 2025;12:e35. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.20
29. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 2010;376(9756):1923-1958. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5 30. Ensink K, Robertson B. Patient and family experiences of psychiatric services and African traditional healers. Transcult Psychiatry 1999;36(1):23-43. https://doi.
org/10.1177/136346159903600102
31. Van Oosten F. The doctrine of informed consent in medical law. S Afr Law J 1989;106(1):61-82.