Emergency care capacity of private primary healthcare facilities in Gauteng, South Africa
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Strengthening emergency care at the primary healthcare (PHC) level has been identified as a strategy for improving the emergency care system, which should include the private sector as well. As the National Health Insurance Act will soon come into effect, more non-medical aid users are expected to access private healthcare facilities. There is a great need for further assessment of the emergency care capacity at private primary healthcare facilities.
Objective. To use a standardised facility-based assessment tool to assess if private PHC facilities in Gauteng have the capacity to deliver emergency care services using the HEAT (Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool).
Method. The Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool (HEAT) – a standardised tool – was used for quantitative description of the critical functions and structure of an emergency unit (EU) at any facility level of PHC facilities in a private healthcare group.
Results. More than half (n/N=10/19) of the facilities participated in the study. Facilities demonstrated adequate equipment, resources and staffing for basic emergency care despite a lack of specific skills and specialised protocols.
Conclusion. All private primary healthcare facilities met the listed infrastructure and essential equipment requirements for emergency care, including a resuscitation area; however, none of the facilities had an area specifically for triage. Common barriers to performing emergency care procedures across most facilities were due to a lack of training in emergency protocols and procedures.
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The SAJCC is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
1. Obermeyer Z, Abujaber S, Makar M, et al. Emergency care in 59 low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Bull World Health Org 2015;93:577-586G. https://doi.org/10.2471/ BLT.14.148338
2. World Health Organization. World Health Assembly 72.16: Emergency care systems for universal health coverage. Ensuring Timely Care for the Acutely Ill and Injured. Geneva: WHO, 2019.
3. Chavula C, Pigoga J, Kafwamfwa M, Wallis L. Cross-sectional evaluation of emergency care capacity at public hospitals in Zambia. Emerg Med J 2019;36(10):620-624. https://doi. org/10.1136/emermed-2018-207465
4. Van de Pas R, Affun-Adegbulu C, Ricarte B, van de Put W, Van Damme W, Van Belle S. Primary Healthcare and Emergencies. WHO Technical Series on Primary Healthcare. Geneva: WHO, 2018.
5. Hardcastle TC, Samuels C, Muckart DJ. An assessment of the hospital disease burden and the facilities for the in-hospital care of trauma in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. World J Surg
2013;37:1550-1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1889-1
6. Kironji AG, Hodkinson P, de Ramirez SS, et al. Identifying barriers for out of hospital emergency
care in low- and low-middle income countries: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res
2018;18:291-291. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3091-0
7. Botes M. Strengthening the emergency care system at a primary healthcare level using a
framework for policy analysis. PhD thesis. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand, 2021.
8. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. Geneva: United Nations, 2009.
9. Jassat W, Abdool Karim SS, Mudara C, et al; DATCOV author group; Blumberg L, Cohen C. Clinical severity of COVID-19 in patients admitted to hospital during the omicron wave in South Africa: A retrospective observational study. Lancet Glob Health 2022;10(7):e961-e969. https://doi. org/ 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00114-0
10. Innes GD, Sivilotti ML, Ovens H, et al. Emergency overcrowding and access block: A smaller problem than we think. Canadian J Emerg Med 2019;21:177-185. https://doi.org/10.1017/ cem.2018.446
11. Behghadami MA, Janati A, Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Gholizadeh M, Rahmani F, Arab-Zozani M. Assessing preparedness of non-hospital health centers to provide primary emergency care: A systematic review. Bull Emerg Trauma 2019;(7(3):201-211.
12. Coyle RM, Harrison H-L. Emergency care capacity in Freetown, Sierra Leone: A service evaluation. BMC Emerg Med 2015;15(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-015-0027-4
13. Aggarwal R, Ranganathan P. Study designs: Part 2. Descriptive studies. Perspect Clin Res 2019;10(1):34-36. https://doi.org/10.29252/beat-070301
14. Gray JR, Grove SK, Sutherland S. Burns and Grove’s The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis and Generation of Evidence. 8th ed. Missouri: Elsevier, 2017.
15. Kharel R, Thapa G, Voor T, et al. Emergency unit assessment of seven tertiary hospitals in Nepal using the WHO tool: A cross-sectional study. Int J Emerg Med 2023;16(1):13. https://doi. org/10.1186/s12245-023-00484-2
16. Tadesse L, Abdullah N, Awadalla H, et al. A global mandate to strengthen emergency, critical and operative care. Bull World Health Org 2023;101(4):231-231A. https://doi.org/10.2471/ BLT.23.289916
17. Van Hoving DJ, Barnetson BK, Wallis LA. Emergency care research priorities in South Africa. S Afr Med J 2015;105:202-208. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.8967.
18. Botes M, Bruce J, Cooke R. How healthcare practitioners experience emergencies at primary healthcare facilities – kinks in the chain of survival. Afr J Emerg Med 2022;12(4):423-427. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2022.09.001