Developing simulation-based training for paediatric registrars using best evidence: Sepsis and the Phoenix Sepsis Criteria
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children, particularly in resource-restricted settings. Early recognition and management are crucial to improving patient outcomes. Despite fairly extensive clinical exposure, paediatric registrars often manage these cases without direct supervision or time for critical reflection. Simulation-based learning experiences (SBLEs) offer a platform for mastering emergency care without risking patient safety.
Objective. To develop, implement and evaluate an SBLE for paediatric registrars to enhance their confidence and learning in managing paediatric sepsis, incorporating the recently published Phoenix Sepsis Criteria and current evidence-based guidelines.
Methods. An SBLE was developed according to the ADDIE instructional model. The learning experience included a prebriefing phase, a scenario execution using a SimBaby® manikin and a structured debriefing. Paediatric registrars evaluated the SBLE using the modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool (SET-M), which assessed self-reported learning and confidence across the prebriefing, simulated scenario and debriefing phases.
Results. Seven registrars participated in the SBLE. The SET-M demonstrated high scores across all domains, with high median scores obtained for prebriefing (6/6), learning (17/18), confidence (16/18) and debriefing (15/15).
Conclusion. This SBLE enhanced both confidence and learning related to managing paediatric sepsis as reported by participants. The simulation also provided a structured platform to introduce the Phoenix Sepsis Criteria and discuss context-appropriate care in resource-limited settings. The value of simulation in paediatric emergency training is demonstrated.
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The SAJCH is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
1. Schlapbach LJ, Watson RS, Sorce LR, et al. International consensus criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock. JAMA 2024;331(8):665-674. https://doi. org/10.1001/jama.2024.0179
2. WatsonRS,CarrolED,CarterMJ,KissoonN,RanjitS,SchlapbachLJ.Theburden and contemporary epidemiology of sepsis in children. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2014;8(9):670-681. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-4642(24)00140-8
3. Miranda M, Nadel S. Pediatric sepsis: A summary of current definitions and management recommendations. Curr Pediatr Rep 2023;11(2):29-39. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40124-023-00286-3
4. Reinhart K, Daniels R, Kissoon N, Machado F, Schachter R, Finfer S. Recognizing sepsis as a global health priority – a WHO resolution. N Engl J Med 2017;377(5):414-417. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1704633
5. Motola I, Devine L, Chung H, Sullivan J, Issenberg S. Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. Med Teach 2013;35(10):e1511-e1530. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632
6. Cuesta-Montero P, Navarro-Martínez J, Yedro M, Galiana-Ivars M. Sepsis and clinical simulation: What is new? (and old). J Pers Med 2023;13(10):1475. https:// doi.org/10.3390/jpm13101475
7. Ericsson K, Krampe R, Tesch-Römer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev 1993;100(3):363-406. https://doi. org/10.1037//0033-295X.100.3.363
8. Kolb D. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
9. Leiphrakpam PD, Armijo PR, Are C. Incorporation of simulation in graduate medical education: Historical perspectives, current status, and future directions. J Med Educ Curric Dev 2024;11:23821205241257329. https://doi. org/10.1177/23821205241257329
10. BranchRM.Instructionaldesign:TheADDIEapproach.NewYork,NY:Springer, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
11. Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children. Intensive Care Med 2020;46(Suppl 1):10-67. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00134-019-05878-6
12. Stephenson E,PooreJ.Tipsforconductingthepre-briefforasimulation.JContin Educ Nurs 2016;47(8):353-355. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20160715-05
13. Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): Development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simul Healthc 2015;10(2):106-115. https://doi. org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000072
14. LeightonK,RavertP,MudraV,MacintoshC.UpdatingtheSimulationEffectiveness Tool: Item modifications and reevaluation of psychometric properties. Nurs Educ Perspect 2015;36(5):317-323. https://doi.org/10.5480/15-1671
15. Adler MD, Vozenilek JA, Trainor JL, et al. Development and evaluation of a simulation-based pediatric emergency medicine curriculum. Acad Med 2009;84(7):935-941. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a813ca
16. Maitland K, Kiguli S, Opoka RO, et al. Mortality after fluid bolus in African children with severe infection. N Engl J Med 2011;364(26):2483-2495. https:// doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1101549