The association between intimate partner violence and cervical cancer screening among women of childbearing age in South Africa
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Cervical cancer is a major global public health concern, particularly in South Africa (SA), where it is the second most prevalent cancer among women. This prevalence can be attributed to several factors including poor screening rates and the prevalence of HIV. Objective. To examine the association between intimate partner violence (IPV) and cervical cancer screening (CCS) in SA, while considering the influence of other sociodemographic factors.
Methods. The study used cross-sectional data from the 2016 South Africa Demographic and Health Survey, focusing on women of childbearing age who underwent CCS. Bivariate analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between CCS and each independent variable. A binary regression model was used to determine the association between intimate partner violence and CCS while controlling for other variables.
Results. The study found that 32% of women aged 15 to 49 years in SA had undergone CCS at least once in their lifetime. No significant association was established between IPV and CCS uptake (unadjusted odds ratio (uOR) 1.05, 95% CI 0.84 - 1.31; p>0.05 and adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.16, 95% CI 0.89 - 1.51; p>0.05 ). However, sociodemographic factors, including area of residence, age, education level, wealth, race and health insurance status, were significant predictors of CCS. Older women, those with higher education, wealthier individuals and those with health insurance were more likely to undergo screening.
Conclusion. In the present study, IPV was not a significant factor directly influencing CCS uptake. Instead, a complex interplay of sociodemographic factors was identified as predictors of CCS rates. These findings highlight the need for interventions that address the barriers to CCS, particularly in rural areas and among underprivileged and minority populations. Improving education, healthcare coverage and accessibility can potentially enhance screening rates and reduce the burden of cervical cancer in SA.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The SAJPH is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
How to Cite
References
1. Gumede M. Deaths caused by lung and cervical cancers jump in SA. Business Day; 2016.
https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/national/health/2016-12-06-deaths-caused-by-lung-
and-cervical-cancers-jump-in-sa/ (accessed 05 May 2024).
2. Fitzmaurice C. Global, regional and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life
lost, years lived with disability and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 2006 to 2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. J Clin Oncol 2018;36(15_suppl):1568-1568. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.15683. Human Sciences Research Council. New HIV survey highlights progress and ongoing disparities in South Africa’s HIV epidemic. 2023. https://hsrc.ac.za/press-releases/hsc/new- hiv-survey-highlights-progress-and-ongoing-disparities-in-south-africas-hiv-epidemic/ (accessed 05 May 2024).
4. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: A worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2020;8(2):e191-203. https://doi. org/10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30482-6
5. Ntekim A. Cervical cancer in sub Sahara Africa. Topics on cervical cancer with an advocacy for prevention. 2012;4:54-59. https://doi.org/10.5772/27200
6. Western Cape Government. HPV vaccinations. 2024. https://www.westerncape.gov.za/ general-publication/hpv-vaccinations (accessed 05 May 2024).
7. National Department of Health. Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control Policy. 2017.
https://www.westerncape.gov.za/text/2020/February/cervical_cancer_prevention_and_
control_policy.pdf
8. Petersen C, Mkhize SP. Intersections of intimate partner violence and food insecurity in Gauteng. Gauteng City-Region Observatory; 2023. https://doi.org/10.36634/ulaf7237
9. Muluneh MD, Stulz V, Francis L, Agho K. Gender based violence against women in sub- Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 2020;17(3):903. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030903
10. Gordon C. Intimate partner violence is everyone’s problem, but how should we approach it in a clinical setting? S Afr Med J 2016;106(10):962. https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.2016. v106i10.11408
11. Levinson KL, Jernigan AM, Flocke SA, et al. Intimate partner violence and barriers to cervical cancer screening. J Lower Genit Tract Dis 2016;20(1):47-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/ lgt.0000000000000153
12. National Cancer Institute. HIV infection and cancer risk. 2017. https://www. cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/infectious-agents/hiv-fact- sheet#:~:text=Because%20HIV-infected%20women%20have%20a%20higher%20 risk%20of,with%20HIV%20infection%20up%20to%20age%2026%20years (accessed 05 May 2024).
13. National Department of Health, Statistics South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, ICF. Demographic and Health Survey 2016. 2019. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/ pdf/FR337/FR337.pdf
14. Bagwell-Gray ME, Ramaswamy M. Cervical cancer screening and prevention among survivors of intimate partner violence. Health Soc Work 2022;47(2):102-112. https://doi. org/10.1093/hsw/hlac009
15. Engel B. Why so many women don’t report sexual harassment and assault. Psych Central; 2018. https://psychcentral.com/blog/why-so-many-women-dont-report-sexual- harassment-and-assault (accessed 05 May 2024).
16. Yimer NB, Mohammed MA, Solomon K, et al. Cervical cancer screening uptake in sub- Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pub Health 2021;195:105-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.04.014
17. Ndejjo R, Mukama T, Musabyimana A, Musoke D. Uptake of cervical cancer screening and associated factors among women in rural Uganda: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2016;11(2):e0149696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149696
18. Abu SH, Woldehanna BT, Nida ET, Tilahun AW, Gebremariam MY, Sisay MM. The role of health education on cervical cancer screening uptake at selected health centers in Addis Ababa. PLoS One 2020;15(10):e0239580. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239580
19. Murfin J, Irvine F, Meechan-Rogers R, Swift A. Education, income and occupation and their influence on the uptake of cervical cancer prevention strategies: A systematic review. J Clin Nurs 2019;29(3-4):393-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15094
20. McKinnon B, Harper S, Moore S. Decomposing income-related inequality in cervical screening in 67 countries. Int J Pub Health 2010;56(2):139-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00038-010-0224-6
21. Keetile M, Ndlovu K, Letamo G, Disang M, Yaya S, Navaneetham K. Factors associated with and socioeconomic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening among women aged 15-64 years in Botswana. PLoS One 2021;16(8):e0255581. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0255581
22. Musselwhite LW, Oliveira CM, Kwaramba T, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in cervical cancer screening and outcomes. Acta Cytolog 2016;60(6):518-526. https://doi. org/10.1159/000452240
23. Matsolo M. Low-income black women hardest hit by noncommunicable diseases; 2019. https://mg.co.za/article/2019-10-27-00-low-income-black-women-hardest-hit-by- noncommunicable-diseases/ (accessed 05 May 2024).
24. Eng VA, David SP, Li S, Ally MS, Stefanick M, Tang JY. The association between cigarette smoking, cancer screening and cancer stage: A prospective study of the women’s health initiative observational cohort. BMJ Open 2020;10(8):e037945. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2020-037945
25. Sugawara Y, Tsuji I, Mizoue T, et al. Cigarette smoking and cervical cancer risk: An evaluation based on a systematic review and meta-analysis among Japanese women. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2018;49(1):77-86. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyy158
26. Price CR, Hatch LA, Radisic A, et al. Enhancing adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines at a student-run free clinic. J Comm Health 2019;45(1):128-132. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10900-019-00724-8
27. Suk R, Hong Y-R, Rajan SS, Xie Z, Zhu Y, Spencer JC. Assessment of US Preventive Services Task Force guideline - concordant cervical cancer screening rates and reasons for underscreening by age, race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, rurality and insurance, 2005 to 2019. J Am Med Assoc Network Open 2022;5(1):e2143582-. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jamanetworkopen.2021.43582