The prevalence, associated risk factors and pregnancy-related outcomes of large-for-gestational-age newborns delivered at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Large for gestational age (LGA) refers to a newborn birthweight equal to or greater than the 90th percentile for a given GA. Delivering an LGA newborn poses a high risk of morbidity and mortality for both mother and baby.
Objectives. To describe the prevalence of term LGA newborns and identify the factors and pregnancy-related outcomes associated with delivering term LGA newborns at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital (CHBAH), a tertiary hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Methods. We conducted a retrospective, institution-based cross-sectional study from 1 October 2020 to 31 March 2021, in which 275 LGA singleton term deliveries were reviewed. Patient demographics, medical factors and clinical outcomes were recorded and statistically analysed.
Results. The prevalence of LGA newborns in singleton-term deliveries at CHBAH was 3.92%. Associated factors included maternal obesity, multiparity, prolonged pregnancy with a GA >40 weeks, previous LGA delivery and (newborn) male gender. Maternal complications included prolonged labour, increased caesarean delivery, postpartum haemorrhage, obstetric anal sphincter injuries and uterine rupture. Fetal and neonatal complications included shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycaemia, and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.
Conclusions. LGA singleton term deliveries at CHBAH were associated with both maternal and neonatal morbidity. The presence of associated factors should alert maternity caregivers to closely monitor these pregnancies and plan for an appropriate mode of delivery. LGA newborns should be routinely screened and appropriately managed for hypoglycaemia.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The SAJOG is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
1. Wilcox AJ. On the importance – and the unimportance – of birthweight. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30(6):1233-1241. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/30.6.1233
2. Barth Jr WH, Jackson R. Macrosomia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 216. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135(1):e18-e35. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003606.
3. Black MH, Sacks DA, Xiang AH, Lawrence JM. The relative contribution of pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity, gestational weight gain, and IADPSG-defined gestational diabetes mellitus to fetal overgrowth. Diabetes Care 2013;36(1):56-62. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0741
4. https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/pediatrics/perinatal-problems/large-for-gestational- age-lga-infant (accessed 21 June 2024).
5. Alberico S, Montico M, Barresi V, et al. The role of gestational diabetes, pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on the risk of newborn macrosomia: results from a prospective multicentre study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393- 14-23.
6. Siggelkow W, Boehm D, Skala C, Grosslercher M, Koelbl H. The influence of macrosomia on the duration of labor, the mode of delivery and intrapartum complications.
7. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, et al. Perinatal outcome of fetuses with a birth weight greater than 4 500 g: An analysis of 3356 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;109(2):160-165. https:// doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00045-9
8. Das S, Irigoyen M, Patterson MB, Salvador A, Schutzman DL. Neonatal outcomes of macrosomic births in diabetic and non-diabetic women. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;94(6):F419-F422. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2008.156026
9. Beta J, Khan N, Khalil A, Fiolna M, Ramadan G, Akolekar R. Maternal and neonatal complications of fetal macrosomia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;54(3):308-318. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20279
10. Adugna DG, Enyew EF, Jemberie MT. Prevalence and associated factors of macrosomia among newborns delivered in University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialised Hospital, Gondar, Ethiopia: An institution-based cross-sectional study. Pediatric Health Med Ther 2020;11(1):495- 503. https://doi.org/10.2147/PHMT.S289218
11. Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital. Welcome page. https://www.chrishanibaragwanathhospital. co.za/ (accessed 21 June 2024).
12. The Global Health Network. The International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century: Standards and Tools. https://intergrowth21.tghn.org/standards-tools/ (accessed 21 June 2024).
13. World Health Organization. A healthy lifestyle – WHO recommendations. Geneva: WHO, 2010. https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/a-healthy-lifestyle---who- recommendations (accessed 21 June 2024).
14. Chiavaroli V, Castorani V, Guidone P, et al. Incidence of infants born small- and large-for- gestational-age in an Italian cohort over a 20-year period and associated risk factors. Ital J Pediatr 2016;42:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-016-0254-7
15. Younes S, Samara M, Salama N, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and feto-maternal outcomes of inappropriate birth weight for gestational age among singleton live births in Qatar: A population-based study. PLoS OneNE 2021;16(10):e0258967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.025896716. Harvey L, Van Elburg R, van der Beek EM. Macrosomia and large for gestational age in Asia: One size does not fit all. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021;47(6):1929-1945. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14787
16. Nchinyani MJ. The effect of maternal weight gain on obstetric outcome. Wits Institutional Repository Environment 2018.
17. https://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/server/api/core/bitstreams/d2b59a81-9629-4791-9694- 5ff780d5636d/content (accessed 29 March 2025).
18. Catalano PM, Drago NM, Amini SB. Factors affecting fetal growth and body composition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172(5):1459-1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90478-6
19. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: Global and regional estimate. BMJ Glob Health 2021;6(6):e005671. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh- 2021-005671
20. National Department of Health. Saving Mothers Annual Report 2020. Pretoria: NDoH, 2020.
https://www.health.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/13-10-22-Saving-Mothers-Annual-
Report-2020.pdf (accessed 21 June 2024).
21. Field A, Haloob R. Complications of caesarean section. Obstet Gynaecol 2016;18(4): 265-272.
https://doi.org/10.1111/tog.12280 22. Cronje HS, Lombard HA. Clinical Obstetrics: A South
African Perspective. 5th ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers; 2023:80-90.
22. Said AS, Manji KP. Risk factors and outcomes of fetal macrosomia in a tertiary centre in Tanzania: A case-control study. BMC Preg Childbirth 2016;16:243. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016- 1044-3
23. Deneux-Tharaux C, Delorme P. Epidemiology of shoulder dystocia. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2015;44(10):1234-1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.036
24. Edwards T, Harding JE. Clinical Aspects of Neonatal Hypoglycemia: A mini review. Front Pediatr 2021;8:562251. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.562251