Putting us to the test: An assessment of the agreement between preoperative investigations ordered and evidence-based guidelines at a tertiary level hospital in the Western Cape Province, South Africa – a retrospective record review study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7196/Keywords:
Pre-operative investigations, Over-testing, NICE guidelinesAbstract
Background. Recommendations for preoperative investigations are available worldwide, and are advocated for in an attempt to reduce unnecessary testing, especially in healthy patients undergoing low-risk surgery. However, despite these guidelines, unnecessary preoperative testing still occurs. This is the first South African study comparing preoperative investigations ordered with the recommendations of both the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and local preoperative testing guidelines.
Objectives. Primary objectives were to describe the preoperative investigations ordered in patients undergoing elective surgery, compare these with international and local guidelines, and assess the cost of overtesting. Secondary objectives were to assess the frequency of abnormal laboratory results in tests not indicated by the guidelines, as well as to assess patterns in overtesting.
Methods. This was a retrospective record review study of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 and 2 patients undergoing elective minor and intermediate surgical procedures in Tygerberg Hospital between November and December 2021. The preoperative investigations of 501 patients were studied, including laboratory tests (full blood count (FBC), urea, creatinine and electrolytes panel and international normalised ratio), point-of-care haemoglobin, chest radiographs (CXRs) and electrocardiograms. Tests were compared with guidelines, and the cost of any overtesting was calculated. Patterns in overtesting were evaluated. Data were sourced from electronic medical records. SPSS version 28 was used to analyse data.
Results. A total of 501 patients undergoing elective surgery were included. As many as 89% of the cohort had at least one unnecessary test done (95% confidence interval 85.9 - 91.6). Overall, FBCs and CXRs were the most overtested investigations, being done unnecessarily in one-third of patients. Redundant duplicate testing occurred 177 times. The projected potential cost savings on preoperative investigations if NICE guidelines were followed at Tygerberg Hospital are ZAR857 987 per annum, and ZAR696 515 per annum if the local guidelines are followed. Extra testing as per local guidelines compared with NICE guidelines was mostly unhelpful to reveal additional clinically relevant abnormalities. General surgery patients, patients aged >35 years, ASA 2 patients and females were subject to the highest levels of overtesting (p<0.001).
Conclusion. Preoperative testing over and above testing recommended by both international and local guidelines is common, and represents an enormous area for potential cost savings in a resource-limited environment. Additional local studies are required to further expand on overtesting and the factors contributing to it.
References
1. Klein A, Arrowsmith J. Should routine preoperative testing be abandoned? J Assoc Anaesthetists of Great Brit Ireland 2010;65(10):974-976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06503.x
2. Smetana GW, Macpherson DS. The case against routine preoperative laboratory testing. Med Clin North Am 2003;87(1):7-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-7125(02)00147-5
3. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation. Anesthesiology 2012;116(3):522-538. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c1067
4. ChandraA,ThakurV,BhasinN,GuptaD.Theroleofpreoperativeinvestigationsinrelativelyhealthy general surgical patients - a retrospective study. Anaesthesia, Pain Intensive Care 2014;18(3):241- 244.
5. Hepner DL. The role of testing in the preoperative evaluation. Cleve Clin J Med 2009;76(Suppl 4):S22-S27. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.76.s4.046. Mancuso CA. Impact of new guidelines on physicians’ ordering of preoperative tests. J Gen Intern Med 1999;14(3):166-172. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00308.x
7. Roizen M. More preoperative assessment by physicians and less by laboratory tests. N Engl J Med 2000;342(3):204-205. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200001203420311
8. Ferrando A, Ivaldi C, Buttiglieri A, et al. Guidelines for preoperative assessment: Impact on clinical practice and costs. Int J Qual Health Care 2005;17(4):323-329. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi039
9. Buley HE, Bishop D, Rodseth R. The appropriateness of preoperative blood testing: A retrospective
evaluation and cost analysis. S Afr Med J 2015;105(6):487-490. https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.9318
10. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Routine preoperative tests for elective surgery 2016.
NICE, 2016. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng45 (accessed 18 May 2022).
11. InstituteforClinicalSystemsImprovement.Healthcareguideline:Perioperative.Bloomington:ICSI,2020.
12. Dobson G, Chow L, Filteau L, et al. Guidelines to the practice of anesthesia – revised edition 2021. Can
J Anesthesia 2021;68(1):92-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01842-x
13. Siriussawakul A, Nimmannit A, Rattana-Arpa S, Chatrattanakulchai S, Saengtawan P, Wangdee A. Evaluating compliance with institutional preoperative testing guidelines for minimal-risk patients
undergoing elective surgery. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/835426
14. St. Clair CM, Shah M, Diver EJ, et al. Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for preoperative testing in women undergoing gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116(3):694-700. https://doi.
org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ec448d
15. Keshavan VH, Swamy CMN. Preoperative laboratory testing: A prospective study on comparison and cost analysis. Indian J Anaesth 2016;60(11):838-842. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.193678
16. Bryson GL, Wyand A, Bragg PR. Preoperative testing is inconsistent with published guidelines and rarely changes management. Canadian J Anesthesia 2006;53(3):236-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF03022208
17. Garcia AP, Pastorio KA, Nunes RL, Locks GF, de Almeida MCS. Indication of preoperative tests according to clinical criteria: Need for supervision. Braz J Anesthesiol 2014;64(1):54-61. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.bjane.2013.03.013
18. Guttikonda N, Nileshwar A, Rao M, Sushma TK. Preoperative laboratory testing – comparison of National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines with current practice – an observational study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2019;35(2):227-230. https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_342_17
19. Karim HMR, Yunus M, Bhattacharyya P. An observational cohort study on preoperative investigations and referrals: How far are we following recommendations? Indian J Anaesth 2016;60(8):552-559. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.187783
20. Western Cape Government. Tygerberg Hospital information pamphlet. Tygerberg Hospital Facts and Figures. Cape Town: WC Government, 2016. https://www.westerncape.gov.za/assets/departments/ health/tygerberg_hospital_information_pamphlet_-_2016.pdf (accessed 9 March 2022).
21. Tuazon SA. Prothrombin time. Medscape, 2019. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2086058- overview (accessed 6 September 2022).
22. Brown SR, Brown J. Why do physicians order unnecessary preoperative tests? A qualitative study. Fam Med 2011;43(5):338-343.
23. Srivastava T, Negandhi H, Neogi SB, Sharma J, Saxena R. Methods for hemoglobin estimation: A review of ‘what works.’ J Hematol Transfus 2014;2(3):1028-1034.
24. Shisana O, Labadarios D, Rehle T, et al. The South African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Cape Town: HSRC Press, 2013.
25. Mayosi BM, Flisher AJ, Lalloo UG, Sitas F, Tollman SM, Bradshaw D. The burden of non- communicable diseases in South Africa. Lancet 2009;374(9693):934-947. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(09)61087-4
26. Jardine T, Davids MR. Global dialysis perspective: South Africa. Kidney360 2020;1(12):1432-1436.
https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0005152020
27. Munro J, Booth A, Nicholi J. Routine preoperative testing: A systematic review of the evidence. Health Technol Assess 1997;1(12):1-62.
28. Johnson RK, Mortimer AJ. Routine preoperative blood testing: Is it necessary? Anaesthesia 2002;57(9):914-917. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02750.x
29. Chung F, Mezei G, Tong D. Pre-existing medical conditions as predictors of adverse events in day-case surgery. Br J Anaesth 1999;83(2):262-270. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/83.2.262
30. Dzankic S, Pastor D, Gonzalez C, Leung JM. The prevalence and predictive value of abnormal preoperative laboratory tests in elderly surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2001;93(2):301-308. https:// doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200108000-00013
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 S V Wronski, S Venter
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing Information
The SAMJ is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
Publishing Rights
Authors grant the Publisher the exclusive right to publish, display, reproduce and/or distribute the Work in print and electronic format and in any medium known or hereafter developed, including for commercial use. The Author also agrees that the Publisher may retain in print or electronic format more than one copy of the Work for the purpose of preservation, security and back-up.
