Perspectives of doctors, nurses and rehabilitation therapists in Gauteng and Mpumalanga provinces’ public hospitals on remunerative work outside of the public service
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7196/Keywords:
RWOPS, health professionals, multiple job holding, dual practice, public health sectorAbstract
Background. The remunerative work outside of the public service (RWOPS) policy enables public sector health professionals to engage in multiple job holding (MJH) in South Africa (SA) under specified conditions, but remains controversial. Empirical evidence on health professionals’ perspectives on the RWOPS policy stipulations is lacking.
Objective. To examine the perspectives of public sector medical doctors (MDs), professional nurses (PNs) and rehabilitation therapists (RTs) on the RWOPS policy.
Methods. In 2022, public sector MDs, PNs and RTs were surveyed in 14 Gauteng and 15 Mpumalanga province public sector hospitals. In addition to demographic and employment data, the self-administered questionnaire collected information on whether the health professionals had obtained permission for additional jobs, their opinions on RWOPS approval requirements and restrictions and the likelihood that they would leave the public sector if RWOPS was denied. Data analysis was performed using Stata 17. The factors influencing health professionals’ perspectives on different aspects of the RWOPS policy were analysed using penalised logistic regression.
Results. A total of 1 397 health professionals completed the survey, for a response rate of 84.3%. Most MDs (61.1%) and RTs (60.5%) supported mandatory RWOPS approval, compared with 41.5% of PNs. Overall, 52.6% of MDs, PNs and RTs engaged in MJH also agreed with mandatory approval. Among those who engaged in MJH, the majority of MDs (84.7%) and RTs (87.4%) had RWOPS permission, compared with only 19.2% of PNs. MDs (odds ratio (OR) 9.9, p<0.001) and RTs (OR 30.9, p<0.001) were significantly more likely to obtain RWOPS approval than PNs. MDs (OR 2.2, p<0.001), RTs (OR 1.5, p=0.027), males (OR 1.4, p=0.039) and RWOPS participants (OR 2.8, p=0.030) were more likely to consider leaving if RWOPS was denied.
Conclusion. Our findings highlight significant variation in obtaining MJH permission among health professionals. The diverse perspectives underscore the need for targeted communication and stakeholder engagement to clarify policy and improve compliance.
References
1. World Health Organization. Working for Health 2022 - 2030 action plan: Planning and financing. Geneva: WHO, 2022. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/365796/9789240063389-eng. pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 9 March 2022).
2. Kiwanuka SN, Kinengyere AA, Rutebemberwa E, et al. Dual practice regulatory mechanisms in the health sector: A systematic review of approaches and implementation. London EPPI-Centre Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 2011. http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/ cms/Portals/0/PDF%20reviews%20and%20summaries/Dual%20Practice%202011%20Kiwanuka.pdf. (accessed 26 March 2020).
3. Järvensivu A, Pulkki J. Multiple job holding, societal change, and individual careers: Contributions to the chaos theory of careers. Austr J Career Development 2020;29(1):67-76. https://doi. org/10.1177/1038416219886710
4. Ensor T, Serneels P, Lievens T. Public and private practice of health workers. In: Soucat A, Scheffler R, Ghebreyesus TA, eds. The Labour Market for Health Workers in Africa: A New Look at the Crisis. Washington DC: World Bank, 2013.
5. World Health Organization. Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030. Geneva: WHO, 2016. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250368/?sequence=1 (accessed 9 January 2023).
6. García-Prado A, Gonzalez P. Policy and regulatory responses to dual practice in the health sector. Health Policy 2007;84(2-3):142-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.03.006
7. Department of Public Service and Administration, South Africa. Directive on other remunerative work outside the employee’s employment in the relevant department as contemplated in section 30 of the Public Service Act, 1994. Pretoria: DPSA, 21 February 2024. https://www.dpsa.gov.za/dpsa2g/ documents/iem/2024/Directive%20on%20Other%20Remunerative%20Work%20Outside%20an%20 Employees%20Employment.pdf (accessed 20 March 2024).
8. Department of Public Service and Administration, South Africa. Directive on other remunerative work outside the employee’s employment in the relevant department as contemplated in section 30 of the Public Service Act, 1994. Pretoria: DPSA, 1 November 2016. Republic of South Africa Department of Public Service and Administration. https://www.surgeon.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ directive_rwops_30_09_20161-002.pdf (accessed 26 September 2020).
9. Bateman C. RWOPS abuse – government’s had enough: Izindaba. S Afr Med J 2012;102(12):899-901.
https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC128996.
10. Bateman C. RWOPS abuse could cost, or even ruin, offenders. S Afr Med J 2013;103(8):506-508.
https://doi.org/10.1796/SAMJ.7235
11. Benatar S. Professional competence and professional misconduct in South Africa. S Afr Med J 2014;104(7):480-482. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.8492
12. Shipley J. Private practice (RWOPS) and overtime for state-employed specialists. SA Orthopaedic J 2015;14(1):18-19. https://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?pid=S1681-150X2015000100003&script=sci_ arttext (accessed 22 July 2024).
13. Taylor A, Kahn D. The RWOPS debate – yes we can! S Afr Med J 2014;104(7):475-457. https://doi. org/10.7196/SAMJ.8050
14. Public Service Commission, South Africa. Remunerative work outside the public service: An investigation undertaken in the Gauteng Provincial Health sector. Pretoria: PSC, 2007. https://www. psc.gov.za/documents/2004/remunerative_woroutside_psc.pdf (accessed 11 March 2020).
15. Goldstein LN. Thieves of the state. S Afr Med J 2012;102(9):719. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.6165 16. Bateman C. RWOPS abuse eroding ethical standards of juniors. S Afr Med J 2013;103(8):505-506.
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.7165
17. Bateman C. RWOPS clamp down – a crisis in the offing. S Afr Med J 2013;103(6):361-364. https://doi.
org/10.7196/SAMJ.7029
18. Bateman C. RWOPS – light at the end of a dusty tunnel: Izindaba. S Afr Med J 2013;103(12):888.
https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC145669
19. Department of Public Service and Administration, South Africa. Guide on managing other remunerative work in the public service. Pretoria: DPSA, 2020. https://www.dpsa.gov.za/dpsa2g/ documents/iem/2020/Guide%20on%20Other%20Remunerative%20Work%20in%20the%20%20 Public%20Service.pdf (accessed 26 September 2020).
20. National Department of Health, South Africa. A comprehensive policy guideline on remunerative work outside of the public service (‘RWOPS’) for medical practitioners and dentists. Pretoria: NDoH, 2017.
21. South African Medical Association. SAMA urges compliance with remunerative work outside public service (RWOPS). South African Medical Association Weekly Newsletter, 2022. https://www. samedical.org/cmsuploader/viewArticle/2179 (accessed 8 July 2024).
22. SouthAfricanGovernment.StrengtheningtheSouthAfricanhealthsystemtowardsanintegratedand unified health system, Presidential Health Summit Compact. Pretoria: Office of the Presidency, 2019. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201902/presidential-health-summit-report.pdf (accessed 20 June 2020).
23. Copelyn J, van Dyk J. South Africa’s moonlight sonata: The illicit cash cow care at state hospitals. Mail & Guardian, 6 July 2022. https://mg.co.za/health/2022-07-06-south-africas-moonlight-sonata-the- illicit-cash-cow-draining-specialist-care-at-state-hospitals/ (accessed 22 July 2024).
24. Democratic Nursing Organisation of South Africa. National Congress Resolutions 2019. Cape Town: DENOSA, 2019. https://www.denosa.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/NATIONAL- revised-29-10-2019_.pdf (accessed 22 July 2024).
25. Matiwane BP, Blaauw D, Rispel LC. Examining the extent, forms and factors influencing multiple job holding among medical doctors, professional nurses and rehabilitation therapists in two South African provinces: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2023;13(12):e078902. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2023-078902
26. Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika 1993;80(1):27-38. https://doi. org/10.1093/biomet/80.1.27
27. Heinze G, Schemper M. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat Med 2002;21(16):2409-2419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1047
28. Russo G, Fronteira I, Jesus T, Buchan J. Understanding nurses’ dual practice: A scoping review of what we know and what we still need to ask on nurses holding multiple jobs. Hum Res Health 2018;16(1):1- 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-018-0276-x
29. Jumpa M, Jan S, Mills A. The role of regulation in influencing income-generating activities among public sector doctors in Peru. Hum Res Health 2007;5(1):5. https://doi.org10.1186/1478-4491-5-5
30. Gruen R, Anwar R, Begum T, Killingsworth JR, Normand C. Dual job holding practitioners in
Bangladesh: An exploration. Soc Sci Med 2002;54(2):267-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-
9536(01)00026-0
31. Rispel LC, Chirwa T, Blaauw D. Does moonlighting influence South African nurses’ intention to leave their primary jobs? Glob Health Act 2014;7:25754. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754
32. Ashmore J, Gilson L. Conceptualizing the impacts of dual practice on the retention of public sector specialists – evidence from South Africa. Hum Res Health 2015;13(3):1-9. https://doi. org/10.1186/1478-4491-13-3
33. Berman P, Cuizon D. Multiple public-private job-holding of health care providers in developing countries: An exploration of theory and evidence. London: Department for International Development Health Systems Resource Centre, 2004. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/ media/57a08cd5ed915d622c0015ed/Multiple-public-private-jobholding-of-healthcare-providers.pdf (accessed 19 February 2020).
34. National Department of Health, South Africa. 2030 Human Resources for Health Strategy: Investing in the health workforce for universal health coverage. Pretoria: NDoH; 2020. https://www.spotlightnsp. co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2030-HRH-strategy-19-3-2020.pdf (accessed 19 February 2022).
35. Garcia-Prado A. Sweetening the carrot: Motivating public physicians for better performance. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications, 2005.
36. Burke K, Morris K, McGarrigle L. An introductory guide to implementation: Terms, concepts and frameworks. Dublin: Centre for Effective Services, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10147/306846. (accessed 24 May 2024).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 B P Matiwane, D Blaauw, L C Rispel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing Information
The SAMJ is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
Publishing Rights
Authors grant the Publisher the exclusive right to publish, display, reproduce and/or distribute the Work in print and electronic format and in any medium known or hereafter developed, including for commercial use. The Author also agrees that the Publisher may retain in print or electronic format more than one copy of the Work for the purpose of preservation, security and back-up.
