Monitoring District Health System performance in South Africa: A proposed dashboard based on key pragmatic indicators

Authors

  • P Barron School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • H Mahomed Western Cape Government Department of Health and Wellness, Cape Town, South Africa; Division of Health Systems and Public Health, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
  • T C Masilela Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, South African Government, Pretoria, South Africa
  • K Vallabhjee Clinton Health Access Initiative, South Africa, and Division of Health Systems and Policy, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
  • N Ndlovu Health Systems Trust, Durban, South Africa
  • C Goliath Western Cape Government Department of Health and Wellness, Cape Town, South Africa
  • H Schneider School of Public Health and SAMRC Health Services to Systems Research Unit, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2025.v115i5.2673

Keywords:

monitoring and evaluation, district health system, South Africa

Abstract

Effective monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems are central to ensuring the performance and accountability of the district health system (DHS). Current systems in South Africa are suboptimal and poorly oriented to the decision-making needs of district managers. Drawing on a WHO measurement framework for the performance of primary healthcare, and as a follow-up to a first article describing the challenges of M&E systems in the DHS, this article proposes a DHS performance monitoring dashboard that is both practical and pragmatic. The dashboard was constructed in an iterative and consultative process, and consists of 20 indicators for quarterly monitoring. A set of general criteria underpinning the choice of indicators is spelled out (e.g. the data are readily available and reliable). Indicators that do not have much variability, or are better suited to annual evaluation (e.g. number of community health workers per 1 000 population) are not included. The dashboard includes the name or description of the indicator, the definition of the indicator, why it is useful, challenges and pitfalls to be considered when analysing the indicator and how it can be used for decision-making. We propose that these indicators be assessed, tracked and monitored on a quarterly basis by relevant managers at the facility subdistrict and district levels. We emphasise that the purpose of this dashboard is not external compliance, but rather to support district managerial decision-making and accountability.

References

1. Bitton A, Fifield J, Ratcliffe H, et al. Primary healthcare system performance in low-income and middle-income countries: A scoping review of the evidence from 2010 to 2017. BMJ Glob Health 2019;4(Suppl 8):e001551. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001551

2. Barron P, H Mahomed H, Masilela TC, Vallabhjee K, Schneider H. District Health System performance in South Africa: Are current monitoring systems optimal? S Afr Med J 2023;113(12):e1614. https://doi. org/10.7196/SAMJ.2023.v113i12.1614

3. World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund. Primary health care measurement framework and indicators: Monitoring health systems through a primary health care lens. Geneva: WHO, UNICEF, 2022. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/352205/9789240044210-eng. pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 4 July 2024).

4. National Department of Health, South Africa. District Health Management Information System (DHMIS) Policy. Pretoria: NDoH, 2011. https://knowledgehub.health.gov.za/elibrary/district-health- management-information-system-dhmis-standard-operating-procedures-facility (accessed 5 July 2024).

5. National Department of Health, South Africa. The NDoH Data Dictionary. Pretoria: NDoH, 2024. https://dd.dhmis.org/ (accessed 6 July 2024 ).

6. Schneider H, Masilela T, Mndebele J, et al, on behalf of the South African Learning Alliance on the District Health System. Special Series on the District Health System. S Afr Med J 2023;113(11):e1653. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2023.v113i11.1653

7. Rajan D, Papanicolas I, Karanikolos M, Koch K, Rohrer-Herold K, Figueras J. Health system performance assessment: A primer for policymakers. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2022. https://iris.who .int/ handle/ 10665/ 364198 (accessed 9 July 2024).

8. Health system performance assessment: reporting and communicating. Practical guide for policy makers. Brussels: European Commission, 2017. https://health.ec.europa.eu/document/download/165d7fcd- 1d09-4ef1-b815-f78a158ef335_en?filename=2017hspa_reportingcommunicating_en.pdf (accessed 9 July 2024).

9. Lai T, Al Salmi Q, Koch K, Hashish A, Ravaghi H, Mataria A. Health system performance assessment and reforms, Oman. Bull World Health Organ 2024;102(7):533-537. https://doi.org/10.2471/ BLT.24.291750

10. Purohit N, Kaur N, Zaidi SR, et al. Assessing the WHO-UNICEF primary health-care measurement framework; Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Bull World Health Organ 2024;102(7):476-485C. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.23.290655

Downloads

Published

2025-06-03

Issue

Section

DHS series

How to Cite

1.
Barron P, Mahomed H, Masilela TC, Vallabhjee K, Ndlovu N, Goliath C, et al. Monitoring District Health System performance in South Africa: A proposed dashboard based on key pragmatic indicators. S Afr Med J [Internet]. 2025 Jun. 3 [cited 2025 Sep. 25];115(5):e2673. Available from: https://samajournals.co.za/index.php/samj/article/view/2673

Most read articles by the same author(s)