Enhancing cervical cancer screening coverage in selected primary healthcare sites using Lean thinking: The CerviScreen programme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2026.v116i2.3654Keywords:
Lean thinking, Cervical cancer screening, Women living with HIVAbstract
Background. Cervical cancer is the most common malignancy among South African (SA) women of reproductive age, with women living with HIV (WLWH) facing a six-fold higher susceptibility. The National Department of Health recommends baseline cervical cancer screening (CCS) for WLWH upon HIV diagnosis. SA’s reported CCS rate is 19.3%, despite the World Health Organization (WHO)’s recommended 2030 target of 70%. AIDS Healthcare Foundation initiated the CerviScreen programme to improve CCS rates using Lean thinking.
Objectives. To evaluate the effect of the programme on CCS coverage over a 7-month period at selected sites in the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal provinces of SA.
Methods. This quantitative, controlled before-and-after study retrospectively evaluated changes in CCS coverage at purposively selected quality improvement programme (QIP) sites, compared with matched control sites. Key CCS indicator data from Lean A3 tools were analysed. Repeated analysis of variance measures tested changes in CCS proportions over time, at a p<0.05 significance level.
Results. Nine CerviScreen and nine control sites per province were assessed. Significant increases in CCS mean proportions were observed at QIP sites in KwaZulu-Natal (5% - 62.9%; F=8.336, p<0.001) and Eastern Cape (21.2% - 82.4%; F=15.525, p<0.001) provinces. Differences in the change of mean proportions between CerviScreen and control sites were not statistically significant in KwaZulu-Natal (F=0.022, p=0.884) and Eastern Cape (F=0.882, p=0.362). Clinically significant improvements were observed, with the estimated marginal mean at KwaZulu-Natal QIP sites consistently surpassing control sites from month 3 onwards. Eastern Cape sites maintained over 80% coverage from month 4. Screening coverage trends differed significantly between provinces (F=11.12, p=0.004).
Conclusion. Lean thinking, through the CerviScreen programme, has potential to enhance and accelerate CCS among SA WLWH toward attaining the WHO target. The findings underscore the importance of adopting systematic quality improvement approaches, highlighting the need for scale-up of Lean thinking in primary healthcare settings to address underperforming indicators.
References
1. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, et al. Cancer Today. International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2024. https://
gco.iarc.who.int/today (accessed 31 March 2025).
2. Dhokotera T, Asangbeh S, Bohlius J, et al. Cervical cancer in women living in South Africa:
A record linkage study of the National Health Laboratory Service and the National Cancer Registry.
Ecancermedicalscience 2022;16:1348. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2022.1348
3. Stelzle D, Tanaka LF, Lee KK, et al. Estimates of the global burden of cervical cancer associated with HIV.
Lancet Glob Health 2020;9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/ S2214-109X(20)30459-9
4. Eun TJ, Perkins RB. Screening for cervical cancer. Med Clin North Am 2020;104(6):1063-1078. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2020.08.006
5. World Health Organization. Global strategy to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer as a public
health problem. Geneva: WHO, 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240014107
(accessed 20 January 2025).
6. World Health Organization. WHO guideline for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer
lesions for cervical cancer prevention. Geneva: WHO, 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/
item/9789240030824 (accessed 20 January 2025).
7. Bolon J, Samson A, Irwin N, et al. An audit of adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines in a
tertiary-level HIV clinic. Southern Afr J HIV Med 2023;24(1):1490. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.
v24i1.1490
8. AIDS Healthcare Foundation. HIV care and treatment feedback report – Q4 2021 to Q3 2022. Nairobi:
AHF, 2022.
9. Clarke GM, Conti S, Wolters AT, Steventon A. Evaluating the impact of healthcare interventions using
routine data. BMJ 2019;365(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2239
10. Djulbegovic B. A framework to bridge the gaps between evidence-based medicine, health outcomes, and
improvement and implementation science. J Oncol Pract 2014;10(3):200-202. https://doi.org/10.1200/
jop.2013.001364
11. Russ S, Green J, de Winter L, et al. An introduction to quality improvement. J Clin Urol 2023;0(0):1-9.
https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221075405
12. Zidel TG. A Lean Guide to Transforming Healthcare: How to Implement Lean Principles in Hospitals,
Medical Offices, Clinics and Other Healthcare Organizations. Milwaukee: Quality Press, 2006. https://
www.researchgate.net/publication/254072802_A_Lean_Toolbox-Using_Lean_Principles_and_
Techniques_in_Healthcare (accessed 19 February 2026).
13. Womack JP, Jones DT. Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in your Corporation. New York:
Simon & Schuster, 1996.
14. Lean Enterprise Institute. Managing to learn – detailed A3 template. Lean Enterprise Institute, 2010.
https://www.lean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Detailed-A3-Template-from-Managing-to-Learn.
pdf (accessed 4 February 2025).
15. Kumah A, Nwogu CN, Issah AR, et al. Cause-and-effect (fishbone) diagram: A tool for generating and
organizing quality improvement ideas. Innovations J 2024;7(2). https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-23-42
16. Al Mardawi GH, Rajendram R. Investigation of medication safety incidents using root cause analysis and
action. Global J Qual Safety Healthcare 2021;4(1):50-52.
17. Lean Enterprise Institute. 5 whys – what is it? Lean Enterprise Institute, 2018. https://www.lean.org/
lexicon-terms/5-whys/ (accessed 3 February 2025).
18. Jana P, Tiwari M, eds. Lean Tools in Apparel Manufacturing. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing, 2021.
19. Radson D, Boyd AH. The Pareto principle and rate analysis. Qual Engineering 1997;10(2):223-229.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08982119708919129
20. Brooks C. What is a Pareto analysis? Bus News Daily Sen 2014;29(1):1-5.
21. AIDS Healthcare Foundation. Client registers from clinics. Los Angeles: AHF, 2023.
22. Joosten T, Bongers I, Janssen R. Application of lean thinking to healthcare: Issues and observations. Int J
Qual Health Care 2009;21(5):341-347. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzp036
23. Ben-Tovim DI, Bassham JE, Bolch D, Martin MA, Dougherty M, Szwarcbord M. Lean thinking across a
hospital: Redesigning care at the Flinders Medical Centre. Austral Health Rev 2007;31(1):10.
24. Young T, McClean S. A critical look at Lean Thinking in healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:382-
386. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.020131
25. Lenk MA, LaMantia S, Oehler J, Spencer D, Sosa T. Methods to increase reliability in quality improvement
projects. Hosp Pediatr 2024;14(8):e372-e377. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2023-007340
26. De Savigny D, Adam T, eds. Systems Thinking for Health Systems Strengthening. Geneva: World Health
Organization, 2009.
27. Pfadenhauer LM, Mozygemba K, Gerhardus A, et al. Context and implementation: A concept analysis
towards conceptual maturity. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen
2015;109(2):103-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2015.01.004
28. Omotoso KO, Koch SF. Assessing changes in social determinants of health inequalities in South
Africa: A decomposition analysis. Int J Equity Health 2018;17(1):181. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s12939-018-0885-y
29. Bradshaw D. Determinants of health and their trends: Primary health care: In context. S Afr Health Rev
2008;2008:51-69.
30. Giljam-Enright M, Statham S, Inglis-Jassiem G, van Niekerk L. The social determinants of health in rural
and urban South Africa: A collective case study of Xhosa women with stroke. Chapter 8. In: Louw Q,
ed. Collaborative Capacity Development to Complement Stroke Rehabilitation in Africa. Cape Town:
AOSIS, 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574227/ (accessed 10 February 2026).
31. Spagnol GS, Min LL, Newbold D. Lean principles in healthcare: An overview of challenges and
improvements. IFAC Proc 2013;46(24):229-234. https://doi.org/10.3182/20130911-3-BR-3021.00035
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 L Naidoo, S Nxele, T Yusuf-Saka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing Information
The SAMJ is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
Publishing Rights
Authors grant the Publisher the exclusive right to publish, display, reproduce and/or distribute the Work in print and electronic format and in any medium known or hereafter developed, including for commercial use. The Author also agrees that the Publisher may retain in print or electronic format more than one copy of the Work for the purpose of preservation, security and back-up.
