Access to postpartum tubal ligation services in Cape Town, South Africa – an observational study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2023.v113i1.16680Keywords:
womens health, contraceptionAbstract
Background. Many women receiving antenatal care in public health services in Cape Town choose bilateral tubal ligation as their preferred method of postpartum contraception during their antenatal course. If the sterilisation does not occur immediately, these women are discharged on an alternative form of contraception and, ideally, an interval date for bilateral tubal ligation is arranged.
Objectives. To assess the access to tubal ligation services in the Metro West area of Cape Town, South Africa, in women who request
permanent contraception following delivery, looking specifically at the number of women requesting bilateral tubal ligation who receive the procedure intrapartum, immediately postpartum or as an interval procedure. Other objectives included determining the reproductive outcomes if bilateral tubal ligation was not performed, investigating the alternative forms of contraception provided and to study the demographics of the population requesting bilateral tubal ligation as a form of contraception.
Methods. The study was conducted as a cross-sectional observational study collecting data over a period of 3 months, from June 2019 to August 2019. Maternity case records for deliveries between June 2019 and August 2019 from four facilities were reviewed. The facilities, representing all levels of care, were Vanguard Midwife Obstetric Unit, Wesfleur Hospital (district hospital), New Somerset Hospital (regional hospital), Groote Schuur Hospital (tertiary hospital).
Results. There were 260 women who requested tubal ligation as their choice of contraception. Only 50% of these received a tubal ligation. Of the 131 tubal ligations performed, 2 were interval sterilisations. Ninety-one percent (120/131) of the tubal ligations were done at the time of caesarean section. Of the 129 women who received alternative forms of contraception, 13 women had a recurrent pregnancy.
Conclusion. The study suggests that only 50% of women requesting tubal ligation as form of contraception actually end up receiving the procedure. Alternative forms of contraception are widely used and relied upon, but not without risks of recurrent pregnancy. Interval tubal ligation was not easily accessed by those women who were referred for the procedure.
References
USAID Data for Impact. Unmet need for family planning. North Carolina: Data for Impact Project, 2013 (updated 2022). https://www.data4impactproject.org/prh/family-planning/fp/unmetneed- for-family-planning/ (accessed 15 July 2021).
Darroch JE, Singh S. Trends in contraceptive need and use in developing countries in 2003, 2008, and 2012: an analysis of national surveys. Lancet 2013;381(9879):1756-1762. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60597-8
USAID Data for Impact. Contraceptive Prevalence Rate. North Carolina: Data for Impact Project, 2013 (updated 2022). http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/prh/rh_indicators/ specific/fp/cpr (accessed 6 January 2016).
AlkemaL,KantorovaV,MenozziC,BiddlecomA.National,regional,andglobalratesandtrendsin contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: A systematic and comprehensive analysis. Lancet 2013;381:1642-1652.
National Department of Health, South Africa. National contraception and fertility planning policy and service delivery guidelines. Pretoria: NDoH, 2012.
United Nations. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. New York: UN, 2015.
Olakunde BO, Sam-Agudu NA, Patel TY, et al. Uptake of permanent contraception among women in sub-Saharan Africa: A literature review of barriers and facilitators. Contraception
;99(4):205-211.
Guttmacher Institute. Adding it up: Investing in contraception and maternal and newborn health.
New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2019. https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/addingit-up-
contraceptionmnh-2017 (accessed 15 December 2018).
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Sustainable Development
Goals. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. New York: DESA, 2015. https://
sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics (accessed 26 November 2015).
National Department of Health, South African Medical Research Council, ORCMacro. South
Africa Demographic and Health Survey 2003. Pretoria: NDoH, 2007.
Shisana O, Rehle T, Simbayi L, et al. South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence and
Behaviour Survey, 2012. Cape Town: HSRC Press, 2014.
Chersich MF, Wabiri N, Risher K, et al. Contraception coverage and methods used among women
in South Africa: A national household survey. S Afr Med J 2017;107(4):307-314. https://doi.
org/10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i4.12141
Makhathini BS, Makinga PN, Green-Thompson RR. Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of antenatal women to postpartum bilateral tubal ligation at Greys Hospital, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Afr Health Sci 2019;19(3):2615-2622. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v19i3.37
World Health Organization. Unsafe abortion: Global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008. Geneva: WHO, 2011.
Ahmed S, Li Q, Liu L, Tsui AO. Maternal deaths averted by contraceptive use: An analysis of 172 countries. Lancet 2012;380(9837):111-125.
Fortney JA. The importance of family planning in reducing maternal mortality. Stud Fam Plann 1987;18(2):109-114.
Campbell M, Sahin-Hodoglugil NN, Potts M. Barriers to fertility regulation: A review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann 2006;37(2):87-98.
United Nations Population Information Network. Cairo Declaration on Population and Development, ICPPD. Cairo: UNFPA, 1994. https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/resource- pdf/94-09- 04_Cairo_Declaration_on_Population_Development_ICPPD.pdf (accessed 15 July 2021).
UN Women. Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. Beijing: UN Women, 1995. http:// www.pdic.gov.ph/files/gad/International%20GAD%20Treaties /DigitalLibrary.International%20 GAD%20Treaties.Beijing%20Decla ration%20and%20Platform%20for%20Action.pdf (accessed 12 July 2021).
Bi S, Klusty T. Forced sterilisations of HIV-positive women: A global ethics and policy failure. AMA J Ethics 2015;17(10):952-957. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.10.pfor2-1510 21. Gupte PR. India: ‘The Emergency’ and the politics of mass sterilisation. Educ About Asia
;22(3):40-44.
ACOG Committee. Informed consent and shared decision making in obstetrics and gynecology.
Obstetr Gynecol 2021;137(2)392-393. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004248
Hoke T, Harries J, Crede S, et al. Expanding contraceptive options for PMTCT clients: A mixed
methods implementation study in Cape Town, South Africa. Reprod Health 2014;11:3.
Babalola S, John N. Factors Underlying the Use of Long-Acting and Permanent Family Planning Methods in Nigeria: A Qualitative Study. New York: EngenderHealth/The RESPOND Project, 2012. 25. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Best practice in postpartum family planning. Best Practice Paper No 1. London: RCOG, June 2015. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-
research-services/guidelines/bpp1/ (accessed 1 March 2019).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 M Vorster, G Petro, M Patel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing Information
The SAMJ is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
Publishing Rights
Authors grant the Publisher the exclusive right to publish, display, reproduce and/or distribute the Work in print and electronic format and in any medium known or hereafter developed, including for commercial use. The Author also agrees that the Publisher may retain in print or electronic format more than one copy of the Work for the purpose of preservation, security and back-up.
