The utility of transbronchial cryobiopsy performed under conscious sedation for interstitial lung diseases in a resource- constrained setting
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Transbronchial biopsy (TBB) with a cryoprobe, also known as transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC), has become a well- established modality for sampling lung parenchyma. TBLC is performed under general anaesthesia in the majority of centres, utilising rigid or flexible bronchoscopy. In resource-constrained settings, however, most diagnostic bronchoscopies, including TBB, are performed under conscious sedation with flexible bronchoscopy without the presence of a specialist anaesthetist.
Objectives. Given the paucity of evidence on TBLC performed under conscious sedation for interstitial lung diseases (ILD), specifically in a resource-constrained setting, we aimed to describe its utility in a pilot study.
Methods. We prospectively enrolled the first 20 patients who underwent TBLC for ILD at a large tertiary hospital in South Africa. All TBLCs were performed under conscious sedation using a cryoprobe. Patients were actively monitored for complications. The final diagnosis and decision regarding need for a surgical biopsy were made at a multidisciplinary meeting that included at least two specialist pulmonologists with an interest in ILD, a thoracic radiologist, and an anatomical pathologist with an interest in ILD.
Results. Three patients experienced complications. Two (10%) developed a pneumothorax (neither required any intervention). Bleeding that required 10 minutes of tamponade with the endobronchial blocker was observed in one case. This patient experienced no haemodynamic or respiratory compromise and was discharged the same day. There were no complications arising from the use of conscious sedation. A definitive diagnosis was made in 17/20 (85%) of the patients.
Conclusion. TBLC performed at an experienced bronchoscopy centre using a cryoprobe under conscious sedation with a dedicated sedationist was safe and well tolerated. Furthermore, it had a high diagnostic yield, and surgical lung biopsy was avoided in 85% of the patients.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
1. Lentz RJ, Christine Argento A, Colby TV, Rickman OB, Maldonado F. Transbronchial cryobiopsy for diffuse parenchymal lung disease: A state-of-the-art review of procedural techniques, current evidence, and future challenges. J Thorac Dis 2017;9(7):2186-2203. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.06.96
2. Korevaar DA, Colella S, Fally M, et al. European Respiratory Society guidelines on transbronchial lung cryobiopsy in the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases. Eur Respir J 2022;60(5):2200425. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00425-2022
3. Babiak A, Hetzel J, Krishna G, et al. Transbronchial cryobiopsy: A new tool for lung biopsies. Respiration 2009;78(2):203-208. https://doi.org/10.1159/000203987
4. Rodrigues I, Gomes RE, Coutinho LM, et al. Diagnostic yield and safety of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy and surgical lung biopsy in interstitial lung diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev 2022;31(166):210280. https:// doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0280-2021
5. Herth F, Mayer M, Thiboutot J, et al. Safety and performance of transbronchial cryobiopsy for parenchymal lung lesions. Chest 2021;160(4):1512-1519. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.0636. Eknewir S, John TJ, Bennji SM, Koegelenberg CFN. The utility of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in a community with a high HIV and tuberculosis burden. Afr J Thoracic Crit Care Med 2022;28(1):25-27. https://doi. org/10.7196/AJTCCM.2022.v28i1.156
7. Chernik D, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: Study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1990;10(4):244-251.
8. Salton F, Biolo M, Trotta L, et al. A novel technique for conducting flexible bronchoscopy cryobiopsy under conscious sedation: An observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024;103(29):e38493. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038493
9. Sharma D, Vinay V, Saini JK, Sethi P, Kumar L, Dubey PK. Assessing the effectiveness and safety of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy utilizing a flexible bronchoscope with an endobronchial blocker in diffuse parenchymal lung lesions. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2024. https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2024.2887
10. O’Mahony AM, Burke L, Cavazza A, Maher MM, Kennedy MP, Henry MT. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) in the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease:
Experience of first 100 cases performed under conscious sedation with flexible bronchoscope. Irish J Med Sci 2021;190(4):1509-1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11845-020-02453-7
11. Nakai T, Watanabe T, Kaimi Y, et al. Diagnostic utility and safety of non-intubated cryobiopsy technique using a novel ultrathin cryoprobe in addition to conventional biopsy techniques for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Respiration 2023;102(7):503-514. https://doi.org/10.1159/000531010
12. Johannson KA, Marcoux VS, Ronksley PE, Ryerson CJ. Diagnostic yield and complications of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy for interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2016;13(10):1828-1838. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201606-461SR