Comparison of ultraviolet C light and isopropyl alcohol for the disinfection of cellular phones in a paediatric intensive care unit setting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i11.3447Keywords:
cellular phone, 70% isoprophyl alcohol, UVC, ICU, disinfection, infectionAbstract
Background. A considerable proportion of cellular phones (cell phones) used by healthcare workers (HCWs) have been shown to be contaminated with pathogenic micro-organisms, making these devices reservoirs to infect susceptible patients. Although many units have well-defined infection control protocols, methods for the decontamination of cell phones are scarce.
Objectives. To compare the efficacy of ultraviolet C (UVC) light with that of 70% isopropyl alcohol in disinfecting cell phones used by HCWs in a paediatric intensive care unit (ICU).
Methods. A randomised controlled study in a paediatric ICU setting was conducted. Cell phones of HCWs or other personnel entering the ICU were swabbed prior to and after decontamination with either the 70% isopropyl alcohol or UVC light method. The reduction ratio of colony-forming units (CFUs) before and after intervention was analysed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. In addition, the effectiveness of the disinfection methods was compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank paired test.
Results. A total of 74 cell phones were acquired from HCWs working in the paediatric ICU. After excluding 5, 69 samples were therefore available for statistical analysis, with 34 samples subjected to disinfection using 70% isopropyl alcohol-based swabs and 35 samples treated with UVC light disinfection. Disinfection with 70% isopropyl alcohol (z=5.16; p<0.000001) and with UVC light (z=3.28; p<0.005) were individually statistically significantly effective in reducing CFUs. The CFU reduction ratio indicated that disinfection using a 70% isopropyl alcohol solution was 67% more effective than UVC light disinfection (Mann-Whitney U-test score 968; p<0.001).
Conclusion. Although both 70% isopropyl alcohol and UVC light disinfection effectively reduced CFUs following decontamination, 70% isopropyl alcohol was determined to be much more effective.
References
1. Statista Inc. Number of smartphone mobile network subscriptions worldwide from 2016 to 2026. https://www.statista.com/statistics/330695/number-of-smartphone-users-worldwide (accessed 15 August 2024).
2. Bhat SS, Sundeep Hegde K, Salian S. Potential of mobile phones to serve as a reservoir in spread of nosocomial pathogens. Online J Health Allied Sci 2011;10(2):14. http://www.ojhas.org/ issue38/2011-2-14.htm (accessed 4 October 2024).
3. Brady RRW, Wasson A, Stirling I, McAllister C, Damani NN. Is your phone bugged? The incidence of bacteria known to cause nosocomial infection on health-care workers’ mobile phones. J Hosp Infect 2006;62(1):123-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2005.05.005
4. World Health Organization. Report on the burden of endemic health care-associated infection worldwide. 2011. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/80135/9789241501507_eng. pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 25 March 2020).
5. National Healthcare Safety Network, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Identifying healthcare-associated infections (HAI) for NHSN surveillance. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/ pscManual/2PSC_IdentifyingHAIs_NHSNcurrent.pdf (accessed 20 August 2024).
6. Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Culver DH, et al. Comparison of rates of nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care units in the United States. Am J Med 1991;91(3B):192S-196S. https://doi. org/10.1016/0002-9343(91)90368-8
7. Jayalakshmi J, Appalaraju B, Usha S. Cellphones as reservoirs of nosocomial pathogens. J Assoc Physicians India 2008;56:388-389.
8. Arora U, Devi P, Chadha A, et al. Cellphones a modern stayhouse for bacterial pathogens. JK Science 2009;11(3):127-129.
9. Sumritivanicha A, Chintanavilas K, Apisarnthanarak A. Prevalence and type of microorganisms isolated from house staff’s mobile phones before and after alcohol cleaning. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32(6):631-634. https://doi.org/10.1086/660204
10. Angadi K, Gupta U, Misra R, Jadhav SV. Study of the role of mobile phones in the transmission of hospital acquired infections. Med J Dr D Y Patil University 2014;7(4):435. https://doi. org/10.4103/0975-2870.135256
11. Shakir IA, Patel NH, Chamberland RR, et al. Investigation of cell phones as a potential source of bacterial contamination in the operating room. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015;97(3):225-231. https://doi. org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00523
12. Amala SE, Ejikema IF. Bacteria associated with the mobile phones of medical personnel. Am J Biomed Sci 2015;7(1):26-32. https://doi.org/10.5099/aj150100026
13. Mathew JI, Cadnum JL, Sankar T, et al. Evaluation of an enclosed ultraviolet-C radiation device for decontamination of mobile handheld devices. Am J Infect Control 2016;44(6):724-726. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.12.043
14. Nobel Lectures. Physiology or Medicine 1901 - 1921. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1967.
15. Finsen NR. Om anvendelse i medicinen af koncentrerede kemiske lysstraaler. Copenhagen:
Gyldendal, 1896.
16. Dai T, Vrahas MS, Murray CK, Hamblin MR. Ultraviolet C irradiation: An alternative antimicrobial
approach to localised infections? Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2012;10(2):185-195. https://doi.
org/10.1586/eri.11.166
17. SurveyMonkey. Sample size calculator. https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/sample-size-calculator/
(accessed 22 January 2020).
18. PhoneSoap. https://www.phonesoap.com/pages/faq (accessed 15 November 2019).
19. Brown CS, Biesterveld BE, Waits SA. Hey doctor! Did you wash your smartphone? J Gen Intern Med
2020;35(7):2193-2194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05847-6
20. Simmonds R, Lee D, Hayhurst E. Mobile phones as fomites for potential pathogens in hospitals:
Microbiome analysis reveals hidden contaminants. J Hosp Infect 2020;104(2):207-213. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jhin.2019.09.010
21. Kirkby S, Biggs C. Cell phones in the neonatal intensive care unit: How to eliminate unwanted germs. Adv Neonatal Care 2016;16(6):404-409. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000000328
22. Singh S, Acharya S, Bhat M, Rao SK, Pentapati KC. Mobile phone hygiene: Potential risks posed by use in the clinics of an Indian dental school. J Dent Educ 2010;74(10):1153-1158.
23. Murgier J, Coste JF, Cavaignac E, et al. Microbial flora on cell-phones in an orthopedic surgery room before and after decontamination. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016;102(8):1093-1096. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.09.014
24. Sriram S, Madan Kumar P, Swaminathan R, Venkatesh R. Effectiveness of isopropyl alcohol and ultraviolet-based sanitiser on decontamination of mobile phones used by dental personnel. J Patient Saf Infect Control 2018;6(1):19. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_4_18
25. Chawla K, Mukhopadhayay C, Gurung B, Bhate P. Bacterial ‘cell’ phones: Do cell phones carry potential pathogens? Online J Health Allied Sci 2009;8:1-5.
26. Ulger F, Esen S, Dilek A, Yanik K, Gunaydin M, Leblebicioglu H. Are we aware how contaminated our mobile phones with nosocomial pathogens? Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2009;8:1-5. https://doi. org/10.1186/1476-0711-8-7
27. Brady RRW, Wasson A, Stirling I, McAllister C, Damani NN. Is your phone bugged? The incidence of bacteria known to cause nosocomial infection on healthcare workers’ mobile phones. J Hosp Infect 2006;62(1):123-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2005.05.005
28. Akinyemi KO, Atapu AD, Adetona OO, Coker AO. The potential role of mobile phones in the spread of bacterial infections. J Infect Dev Ctries 2009;3(8):628-632. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.556
29. Sidhu SK, Malhotra S, Devi P, Tuli AK. Significance of coagulase negative Staphylococcus from blood cultures: Persisting problems and partial progress in resource constrained settings. Iran J Microbiol 2016;8(6):366-371.
30. Von Eiff C, Peters G, Heilmann C. Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Lancet Infect Dis 2002;2(11):677-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00438-3
31. Dramowski A, Whitelaw A, Cotton MF. Burden, spectrum, and impact of healthcare-associated infection at a South African children’s hospital. J Hosp Infect 2016;94(4):364-372. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jhin.2016.08.022
32. Podschun R, Ullmann U. Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: Epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors. Clin Microbiol Rev 1998;11(4):589-603. https://doi.org/10.1128/ CMR.11.4.589
33. Artelt T, Kaase M, Bley I, et al. Transmission risk on a neonatal intensive care unit: Escherichia coli versus Klebsiella pneumoniae. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2018;2018:1525072. https://doi. org/10.1155/2018/1525072
34. Dramowski A, Aucamp M, Bekker A, Mehtar S. Infectious disease exposures and outbreaks at a South African neonatal unit with review of neonatal outbreak epidemiology in Africa. Int J Infect Dis 2017;57:79-85. https://doi.org/d10.1016/j.ijid.2017.01.026
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing Information
The SAMJ is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
Publishing Rights
Authors grant the Publisher the exclusive right to publish, display, reproduce and/or distribute the Work in print and electronic format and in any medium known or hereafter developed, including for commercial use. The Author also agrees that the Publisher may retain in print or electronic format more than one copy of the Work for the purpose of preservation, security and back-up.
