An audit on the preliminary results of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography performed in the Limpopo Academic Complex, Polokwane, South Africa

Authors

  • M Tun Department of General Surgery, Limpopo Academic Complex and School of Medicine, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa
  • T Gvilia Department of General Surgery, Limpopo Academic Complex and School of Medicine, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa
  • AB (Sebastian) van As Department of General Surgery, Limpopo Academic Complex and School of Medicine, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2022.v112i11b.16821

Keywords:

endoscopic, audit

Abstract

Background. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an endoscopic procedure that is an important treatment
modality for the management of hepatic, pancreatic and biliary diseases. The ERCP unit in the Limpopo Academic Complex in Polokwane, South Africa, was established at the end of 2021.
Objectives. To identify areas for improvement in the new ERCP unit.
Methods. All ERCP procedures were audited in five components: (i) room set-up; (ii) endoscope, guidewires and consumable accessories; (iii) fluoroscopy; (iv) sedation and analgesia; and (v) ERCP endoscopist and staff. These were considered the essential pillars of an ERCP unit. The quality of each component was graded in every ERCP procedure as grade 1 (very poor), grade 2 (below average), grade 3 (average), grade 4 (above average), and grade 5 (highly satisfactory).
Results. Nine therapeutic ERCP procedures were performed during the period 10 January - 31 May 2022. Eighteen theatre slots were
allocated for ERCP procedures during the study period, but only seven of them were utilised. The quality of ERCP unit components was
highest for the sedation and analgesia component (mean grade of 4) and lowest for fluoroscopy (mean 1.8).
Conclusion. Establishing a new ERCP service is a task with many challenges. We present the preliminary results of the Limpopo Academic Complex ERCP unit with a view to adding our experience to the current knowledge.

References

Haisley KR, Hunter JG. Gallbladder and extra-biliary system. In: Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, et al., eds. Shwartz’s Principles of Surgery. 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2019: chapter 32.

Cotton PB. ERCP overview – a 30 year perspective. In: Cotton P, Leung J, eds. Advanced Digestive Endoscopy. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing, 2008:1-8.

Statista.TotalpopulationofSouthAfrica2021,byprovince.7September2022.https://www.statista.com/ statistics/1112169/total-population-of-south-africa-by-province/ (accessed 10 September 2022).

GearMWL,DentNA,Colin-JonesDG,Lennard-JonesJE,ColleyJRT.FutureneedsforERCP:Incidence of conditions leading to bile duct obstruction and requirements for diagnostic and therapeutic biliary procedures. Gut 1990;31(10):1150-1155. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.31.10.1150

Working Party of the Clinical Services Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology. Special reports: Provision of gastrointestinal endoscopy and related services for a district general hospital. Gut 1991;32(1):95-105. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.32.1.95

Carr-Locke DL, Conn MI, Faigel DO, et al. Technology status evaluation: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: November 1998. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49(6):858-861. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70318-4

Mergener K, Korazek RA. Therapeutic pancreatic endoscopy. Endoscopy 2005;37(3):201-207. https:// doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-860999

Leung J. Fundamentals of ERCP. In: Cotton P, Leung J, eds. Advanced Digestive Endoscopy. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing, 2008:17-80.

Talukdar R. Complications of ERCP. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016;30(5):793-805. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.bpg.2016.10.007

Ferreira AO, Cravo M. Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Where are we at in 2014? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015;7(2):102-109. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i2.102

NayarM,NicolsonG,GrayH,HodgsonL.Experiencesofthe‘1stNewcastleERCPandEUSCoursefor Nurses’. Gastrointest Nurs 2010;8(8):38-40. https://doi.org/10.12968/gasn.2010.8.8.79165

Baron TH, Peterson BT, Mergrener K, et al. Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;63(4 Suppl):S29-S34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gie.2006.02.019

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Renewal of endoscopic privileges: Guidelines for clinical application. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49(6):823-825. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016- 5107(99)70310-X

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Principles of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49(6):845-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70316-0

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48(6):679-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016- 5107(98)70059-8

Morgan DE. Radiologic issues in ERCP. In: Baron TH, Korazek R, Carr-Locke DL, eds. ERCP. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2008:19-30.

EuropeanObservatoryonHealthSystemsandPoliciesandSmithPC.Whatisthescopeforhealthsystem efficiency gains and how can they be achieved? Eurohealth 2012;18(3):3-7. https://apps.who.int/iris/ handle/10665/333131 (accessed 23 October 2014).

Downloads

Published

2022-11-17

How to Cite

1.
Tun M, Gvilia T, van As A (Sebastian). An audit on the preliminary results of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography performed in the Limpopo Academic Complex, Polokwane, South Africa. S Afr Med J [Internet]. 2022 Nov. 17 [cited 2025 Apr. 29];112(11b):895-8. Available from: https://samajournals.co.za/index.php/samj/article/view/464

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>