Fostering self-regulated motivation, engagement and student autonomy in an undergraduate natural sciences physiology programme

Main Article Content

R Vorster-de Wet
L J van der Merwe
L Nel

Abstract

Background. Self-efficacy, a person’s belief in their ability to achieve, strongly influences students’ academic motivation, self-regulated learning strategies and academic success. This study explored student self-efficacy in the teaching and learning environment of an undergraduate natural sciences physiology programme at the University of the Free State.
Objective. To develop evidence-based guidelines to improve student self-efficacy.
Methods. In phase II of an explanatory mixed-methods research design, semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect qualitative data from undergraduate natural sciences physiology students and their lecturers, identified through purposive sampling. The qualitative data were analysed thematically.
Results. Three constructs emerged from the thematic analysis: attitudes and approaches, motivational dynamics and teaching practices. Within the construct motivational dynamics, the theme self-regulated motivation comprised the categories (i) motivation to study; (ii) future-orientedness and (iii) student engagement. 
Conclusion. Based on the findings, a guideline to foster self-motivation, engagement and student autonomy in the teaching and learning environment was developed to enhance student self-efficacy. Future research could evaluate the effectiveness of the guideline following implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Fostering self-regulated motivation, engagement and student autonomy in an undergraduate natural sciences physiology programme. (2026). African Journal of Health Professions Education, 18(2b), e4407. https://doi.org/10.7196/

References

1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977;84(2):191-215.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

2. Olivier E, Archambault I, De Clerq M, Galand B. Student self-efficacy, classroom engagement, and academic

achievement: Comparing three theoretical frameworks. J Youth Adolesc 2019;48(2):326-340. https://doi.

org/10.1007/s10964-018-0952-0

3. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991;50(2):248-287.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l

4. Miller AD, Ramirez EM, Murdock TB. The influence of teachers’ self-efficacy on perceptions: Perceived teacher

competence and respect and student effort and achievement. Teach Teach Educ 2017;64:260-269. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.008

5. Fackler S, Malmberg LE. Teachers’ self-efficacy in 14 OECD countries: Teacher, student group, school and

leadership effects. Teach Teach Educ 2016; 56:185-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.002

6. Moseki M, Shulze S. Promoting self-regulated learning to improve achievement: A case study in higher education.

Afr Educ Rev 2010;7(2):356-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2010.515422

7. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3(2):77-101. https://doi.

org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

8. Bandura A. Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspect Psychol Sci 2006;1(2):164-180. https://doi.

org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x

9. Smith CS, Hung LC. Using problem-based learning to increase computer self-efficacy in Taiwanese students.

Interact Learn Environ 2017;25(3):329-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1127818

10. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions,

theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp Educ Psychol 2020;61:101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

cedpsych.2020.10186