Learning style preferences among clinical year physiotherapy students in Ghana
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Learning style is the manner by which one learns. Every student has a different and unique learning style. However, the educational implication of learning style preferences has been a source of controversy among researchers and educators.
Objectives. To determine the learning style preferences of clinical year physiotherapy students.
Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 82 undergraduate physiotherapy students from two universities in Ghana. A data-capturing form was used to obtain participants’ sociodemographic information, while the Kolb learning style questionnaire was used to determine the learning style preferences of the students. The χ2 statistic was used to determine the association between gender and learning style preferences, as well as between level of study and learning style preferences.
Results. The participants comprised 43 (52.4%) male students and 39 (47.6%) female students. Eight (9.8%) students preferred the accommodating learning style, 46 (56.0%) preferred the diverging learning style, 15 (18.3%) preferred the assimilating learning style and 13 (15.9%) preferred the converging learning style. There was a significant association between gender and preferred learning style (p=0.027), but no significant association between level of study and preferred learning style (p=0.179).
Conclusion. This study revealed that the diverging learning style was the most preferred style, followed by the assimilating learning style. However, there was no association between gender and learning style preferences, as well as level of study and learning style preferences. Further research should be conducted to find the association between the learning environments and the learning style preferences.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The AJHPE is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
Soureshjani KH, Naseri N. Perceptual learning-style preferences of Iranian EFL learners in relation to their proficiency level. Am J Linguistics 2012;1(4):70-74. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.linguistics.20120104.01
Pashler H, McDaniel M, Rohrer D, Bjork R. Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2009;9(3):105-119.
Hess D. Understanding the learning styles of undergraduate physiotherapy students. Afr J Health Professions Educ 2014;6(1):45-47. https://doi.org/10.7196/AJHPE.226
Howard S, Kao T. Learning style preferences and acculturation of multicultural students of the US. Inst Learn Style J 2018;1:1-10.
Kolb AY, Kolb DA. The Kolb Learning Style Inventory ‒ Version 3.1: Technical Specifications. Boston, MA: Hay Resources Direct, 2005.
Zoghi M, Brown T, Williams B, et al. Learning style preferences of Australian health science students. J Allied Health 2010;39(2):95-103.
Osman OD, Halime D. Learning styles of design students and the relationship of academic performance and gender in design education. Learn Instruct 2007;17:345-359.
Milanese S, Gordon S, Pellatt A. Undergraduate physiotherapy student perceptions of teaching and learning activities associated with clinical education. Physical Ther Rev 2013;18(6):439-444. https://doi.org/10.1179/17 43288X12Y.0000000060
Dunn R, Honigsfeld A, Doolan LS, Bostrom L, Russo K. Impact of learning style instructional strategies on students’ achievement and attitudes: Perceptions of educators in diverse institutions. Clearing House 2009;82(3):135-140.
French G, Cosgriff T, Brown T. Learning style preferences of Australian occupational therapy students. Austr Occup Ther J 2007;54:S58-S65.
Almigbal TH. Relationship between the learning style preferences of medical students and academic achievement. Saudi Med J 2015;36(3):349-355. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.3.10320
Zoghi M, Brown T, Williams B, et al. Learning style preferences of Australian health sciences students. J Allied Health Professionals 2010;39(2):95-103.
Polonia GFK. Analysis of sample size in consumer surveys. 2013. http://ec.europa.eu/economyfinance/ dbindicators/surveys/documents/workshops/2013/pl-gfkkpusczaksamplesizeincustomersurveysv22.pdf (accessed 10 December 2019).
Smith DM, Kolb DA. User’s Guide for the Learning-style. Boston: McBer, 1996.
Brew CR. Kolb’s learning style instrument: Sensitive to gender. Educ Psychol Measure 2002;62(2):373-390.