External factors affecting the efficacy of the Albertina Sisulu Executive Leadership Programme in Health Fellowship in South Africa: A 360° qualitative assessment
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. In South Africa (SA), concerns have been expressed that the leadership is not ready for the implementation of National Health Insurance (NHI). The health minister has therefore advocated leadership development and training to equip leaders with the skills to perform optimally. The Albertina Sisulu Executive Leadership Programme in Health (ASELPH) Fellowship, a postgraduate qualification offered in SA, was developed for this purpose and was proven to improve the leadership skills of executive leaders.
Objectives. To identify the various factors influencing the efficacy of the ASELPH Fellowship.
Methods. A quasi-experimental study design was used to determine the factors affecting the ASELPH Fellowship. Data were collected from healthcare leaders (n=42) by means of a questionnaire before and after training. It included post-training and retrospective assessments from their assessors and their module daily assessments and reflective essays. Descriptive analysis and thematic content analysis were used for the qualitative reflections. The perceptions of participants, including students and assessors, regarding external barriers to implementing their newfound skills and competencies were assessed.
Results. Participants found it difficult to implement their training owing to a lack of leadership skills and knowledge, shortage of human and financial resources, political pressure, poor governance and policy implementation. Despite these barriers, participants who attended the course were still able to improve their leadership skills and performance in the workplace.
Conclusion. Leadership training and development programmes such as the ASELPH Fellowship bode well for the future implementation of public health because much-needed leadership skills are injected into the currently beleaguered public health system.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The AJHPE is published under an Attribution-Non Commercial International Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, authors agree to make articles available to users, without permission or fees, for any lawful, non-commercial purpose. Users may read, copy, or re-use published content as long as the author and original place of publication are properly cited.
Exceptions to this license model is allowed for UKRI and research funded by organisations requiring that research be published open-access without embargo, under a CC-BY licence. As per the journals archiving policy, authors are permitted to self-archive the author-accepted manuscript (AAM) in a repository.
How to Cite
References
1. Van der Berg-Cloete SE, Olorunju S, White JG, Buch E. The Albertina Sisulu Executive Leadership Programme Fellowship enhancing the competencies and performance of public health service managers in South Africa. Leadership Health Services 2020;33(2):163-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/lhs-08-2019-0053
2. Pillay R, Morris MH. Changing healthcare by changing the education of its leaders: An innovation competence model. J Health Adm Educ 2016;33(3):393-410.
3. Maphumulo WT, Bhengu BR. Challenges of quality improvement in the healthcare of South Africa post- apartheid: A critical review. Curationis 2019;42(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v42i1.1901
4. Younger DS. Health care in South Africa. Neurol Clin 2016;34(4):1127-1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ncl.2016.06.004
5. Benatar S, Sullivan T, Brown A. Why equity in health and in access to health care are elusive: Insights from Canada and South Africa. Global Public Health 2018;13(11):1533-1557. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2017.1407813
6. Mayosi BM, Benatar SR. Health and health care in South Africa – 20 years after Mandela. N Engl J Med
2014;371(14):1344-1353. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsr1405012
7. Anon. The World Bank Group: Data 2019 https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.CHEX.GD.ZS?name_
desc=true (accessed 21 November 2019).
8. Shisana O, Dhai A, Rensburg R, Wolvaardt G, Dudley L, Patel RH, Grobler GP, Masilela TC, Rispel LC, Puren
A, Stewart J. Achieving high-quality and accountable universal health coverage in South Africa: A synopsis of
the Lancet National Commission Report. South African Health Review 2019(1):69-80.
9. Gumus S, Bellibas MS, Esen M, Gumus E. A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration Leadership 2018;46(1):25-48. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1741143216659296
10. Daire J, Gilson L, Cleary S. Developing Leadership and Management Competencies in Low and Middle-income Country Health Systems: A Review of the Literature. Cape Town: Resilient and Responsive Health Systems (RESYST), 2014.
11. Njah J, Hansoti B, Adeyami A, et al. Measuring for success: Evaluating leadership training programmes for sustainable impact. Annals Global Health 2021;87(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3221
12. Kringos DS, Sunol R, Wagner C, et al. The influence of context on the effectiveness of hospital quality improvement strategies: A review of systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:277. https://doi. org/10.1186/s12913-015-0906-0
13. Punia BK, Kant S. A review of factors affecting training effectiveness vis-a-vis managerial implications and future research directions. Int J Adv Res Management Soc Sci 2013;2(1):151-164.
14. Frich JC, Brewster AL, Cherlin EJ, Bradley EH. Leadership development programmes for physicians: A systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30(5):656-674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3141-1
15. Fischer R. Cross-cultural training effects on cultural essentialism beliefs and cultural intelligence. Int J Intercultural Relations 2011;35(6):767-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.08.005
16. Bermudez-Tamayo C, Fernandez Ruiz E, Pastor Moreno G, et al. Barriers and enablers in the implementation of a programme to reduce cesarean deliveries. Reprod Health 2017;14(1):106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978- 017-0369-3
17. Tabassi AA, Ramli M, Bakar AHA. Effects of training and motivation practices on teamwork improvement and task efficiency: The case of construction firms. Int J Project Management 2012;30(2):213-224. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.05.009
18. Goldstone C, Ntuli A. Albertina Sisulu Executive Leadership Programme in Health (ASELPH) Final Evaluation Report. Public Health Agency, 2016 (available from ASELPH, University of Pretoria).
19. Schwartz R, Weimer-Elder B, Wilkins E, et al. Developing a feedback-rich culture in academic medicine: The effect of coaching and 360-feedback on physician leadership. BMC Med Educ 2022;22(1):733. https://doi. org/10.1186/s12909-022-03809-6
20. Mercer SL, DeVinney BJ, Fine LJ, Green LW, Dougherty D. Study designs for effectiveness and translation research: Identifying trade-offs. Am J Prev Med 2007;33(2):139-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. amepre.2007.04.005
21. Braun V, Clarke V. What can ‘thematic analysis’ offer health and wellbeing researchers? Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2014;9:26152. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.26152
22. Gilson L, Agyepong IA. Strengthening health system leadership for better governance: What does it take? Health Policy Plan 2018;33(suppl_2):ii1-ii4. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czy052
23. Doherty J, Gilson L, Shung-King M. Achievements and challenges in developing health leadership in South Africa: The experience of the Oliver Tambo Fellowship Programme 2008-2014. Health Policy Plan 2018;33(suppl2):ii50-ii64. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx155